It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: akushla99
originally posted by: amazing
Just think about how much property the Vatican owns and how much money in donations it gets every month. They have so much power is unfathomable.
Exactly...
2 words
UNCOUNTABLE ASSETS
Å99
originally posted by: markosity1973
originally posted by: akushla99
originally posted by: amazing
Just think about how much property the Vatican owns and how much money in donations it gets every month. They have so much power is unfathomable.
Exactly...
2 words
UNCOUNTABLE ASSETS
Å99
I have four more words for you;
OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENTS
All of those coverups and hush money paid to victims of pedophile priests have cost the church dearly. Donations in wills are also drying up fast.
The church is going bankrupt any time soon, but it is not as wealthy as it once was either.
Remember, most of the antiquities held in the Vatican are artifacts that the RCC lifted and shifted from around greater Rome after it was abandoned. ie they preserved them in a time when nobody else wanted them.
Not quite up to conspiracy theory standards, but important enough not to be ignored in the political world.
The Lateran Pacts signed by Mussolini on 11 February 1929, had three parts: a political treaty (giving the Vatican its own micro-state), a financial convention (giving the Vatican reparations) and a concordat (giving privileges within Italy, for instance by letting the Church influence public education). In return for all of this Mussolini received Vatican recognition of the Kingdom of Italy — of which he happened to be the dictator. Through the Lateran Pacts, as a contemporary account noted, “Mussolini has achieved a great diplomatic success, perhaps the greatest of his career.”
Until 1860 Pope Pius IX ruled over his Papal States which stretched across the Italian peninsula, dividing it in two. The following year, when urged to accept a peaceful settlement to avoid an armed assault he indignantly refused. Even after the Pope’s subjects voted overwhelmingly to join Italy, he remained adamant: “This corner of the earth is mine; I received it from Christ”. [1]
originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: akushla99
Perhaps you do not understand the RCC viewpiont on the Vatican, or even how the Vatican came to be a micro state. - Mussolini signed it into existence in 1929
The Lateran Pacts signed by Mussolini on 11 February 1929, had three parts: a political treaty (giving the Vatican its own micro-state), a financial convention (giving the Vatican reparations) and a concordat (giving privileges within Italy, for instance by letting the Church influence public education). In return for all of this Mussolini received Vatican recognition of the Kingdom of Italy — of which he happened to be the dictator. Through the Lateran Pacts, as a contemporary account noted, “Mussolini has achieved a great diplomatic success, perhaps the greatest of his career.”
Before that the Pope had States that divided Italy into three
Until 1860 Pope Pius IX ruled over his Papal States which stretched across the Italian peninsula, dividing it in two. The following year, when urged to accept a peaceful settlement to avoid an armed assault he indignantly refused. Even after the Pope’s subjects voted overwhelmingly to join Italy, he remained adamant: “This corner of the earth is mine; I received it from Christ”. [1]
So the wealth and power that the Vatican holds today is just a fraction of what it had 200 years ago. (And so it should be in my opinion)
I'm Catholic myself and I've seen the treasures of the Vatican in the Museum - they are a collection of works to be shared with humanity and should not be sold off to private collectors who will lock them away from the world. At least now one can pay an entry fee and visit them.
There are other Museums in Rome, I spologise I can't remember the name of them but one of them is a Fort that have equally valuable treasures that the Pope signed away in 1929. If you ever get to Rome, do a historical tour of the Vatican, they tell you all of this
originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: akushla99
The buildings of the Vatican are just that - buildings.
i.e. Michelangelo was paid to paint the Sistine chapel at the time he did the work. He was considered a good artist at the time and somewhat of a pain in the butt as well.
Time and many generations have judged his works to be masterpieces, but when they were done it was just painting the inside of a chapel, like is done in most churches.
PS, did you know that Michelangelo did not like the Pope or the church and painted many insults into it? For Example if one looks up at where the Pope would have when he was using the church there is an image of God's butt