It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton: I Did Not Know What the Email Issue Was All About

page: 4
30
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: vjr1113

Hillary's new theme song any day now...

There were bells on a HILL(ary)





posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 07:19 PM
link   
My theory atm until actual charges are followed is this.

Hillary will get POTUS whether or not the public voted for it. overvoting in districts again, small nudges in electronic voting, etc.

The deep state will get an easy blackmail on POTUS. Hence business as usual, the deep state rules and the POTUS is meant to keep unrest down, a figurehead to praise and hate.

The deep state cares about revenue(taxes,lobbyist,payoffs, etc), tech, and geopolitics.

If I was deep state board of director this would be a blackmail slam dunk. The only thing I need to worry about is a gop candidate getting a +5 plus lead on hillary as it's harder to bs.

Or she is a part of the deep state and it doesn't matter anyways.



posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

There's a reason why people are tired of hearing about this. It is meant to make you tired of it so you don't care anymore what happens to criminals who do things like Hillary does, so that you shrug your shoulders and just play along with "THE" "nothing to see here" psyop transpiring, or already transpired.
This is a pattern that has been ongoing for quite some time with no one that keeps falling for it ever gets.

The nature of criminality that has gone right on by, has done so using these same methods, and it appears it will continue when apathetic individuals keep contributing in a way that just dismisses the criminal elements of what our dearest leaders and those abusing their powers have been doing. Maybe if you didn't keep playing along like they hope you do, you might cause it to have something done about it that does more than just whine how tired you are of people calling them out over and over again.



posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 09:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: xuenchen

that's the stupidest thing ive ever read. i know that was a small minded xenophobic comment but it just backfired on you. you are right, makes no difference at all. people are people. you said it.

you cant even be offensive well




Last time i looked, the USA was a nation of laws not feelings.

Big difference between legal and illegal.

Back to the topic, Hillary thinks she is too big to jail.



posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

i dont think you realize you just proved my point. think before you type.



posted on Jan, 28 2016 @ 03:47 PM
link   
Please read the letter from the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community to members of Congress:

www.redstate.com...

Again, examine the FACTS:

1. The letter, dated 11 August 2015, clearly states that some classified emails on Hillarys server were found to be classified at Top Secret//SI//TK//NOFORN.

2. Top Secret//SI//TK//NOFORN...... Explanation of the former:

www.fas.org...

3. TK means satellite imagery or information derived from that satellite imagery. This information is classified TS//SCI from the very instant that image is snapped.... before it is transmitted back to earth and long before it wound up on her server, it was classified.

science.howstuffworks.com...

4. 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

www.law.cornell.edu...

(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it

This is pretty clear….IF someone willfully transmits or causes to be communicated classified information to someone who does not have the proper clearance, ie; such as putting it on a thumb drive and giving it to your lawyer, then they can be charged under this provision.

(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it

This is pretty clear as well, same as (d), key phrase being “unauthorized possession of”. IF someone has classified information outside of strict control, such as an unclassified email server in their home, they can be charged under this provision.


(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

“Whoever, being entrusted with” This is a catch all phrase that applies to every single person who has or had a security clearance.

“(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed,”

Gross negligence is exactly what it implies. No criminal intent is required for conviction. This negates any defense of “I didn’t know it was classified” or “I wasn’t aware it was classified”. Accidentally having classified material in any place outside of proper controls falls under this category.


“Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Pretty clear.


We can play this game all day long.... anybody wants to prove anything I posted above is wrong, go for it.


Focusing on the question of who leaked the damning evidence outlined in a letter to Congress by the intelligence community Inspector General is a lame attempt to distract from...the damning evidence outlined in a letter to Congress by the intelligence community Inspector General. How journalists got their hands on the documents isn't the story here, and it never will be.

edit on R052016-01-28T16:05:43-06:00k051Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R062016-01-28T16:06:36-06:00k061Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R092016-01-28T16:09:47-06:00k091Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 09:02 AM
link   
What's messed up here is that Hillary thinks people will believe that line!
What may be even more messed up is that indeed some people will!!
...
edit on 29-1-2016 by SyxPak because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:46 PM
link   

The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails with material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.


hosted.ap.org...

hmmmmmm 22 x 10 years looks like a possible 220 years in jail



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa

The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails with material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.


hosted.ap.org...

hmmmmmm 22 x 10 years looks like a possible 220 years in jail

Only the good die young.... she will probably outlive the sentence.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa

The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails with material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.


hosted.ap.org...


That is loaded.

You can see something coming, despite the Earnest comments
of duck and cover.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 03:13 PM
link   
ah yes.....here comes the old republican tried and true measure, of accusing liberals and democrats of everything from murder to treason.......does the phrases "broken record" and "yelling wolf" sound familiar?....you people need to move to another country run by a right-wing dictator, you'll feel much more comfortable among your own people.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: jimmyx
here comes the old republican tried and true measure, of accusing liberals and democrats of everything from murder to treason


I thought Obama was a democrat?

US declares 22 Clinton emails 'top secret'



The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails with material requiring one of the highest levels of classification...

Department officials also said the agency's Diplomatic Security and Intelligence and Research bureaus will investigate whether any of the information was classified at the time of transmission... hosted.ap.org...



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
A CNN "Town Hall" style Q&A meeting last night put the 3 main Democrat candidates on stage (separately - no debate) and Hillary was a gem.

The questions were naturally all scripted as usual.

Sanders did OK and actually addressed issues.

Hillary was asked about the email scandal and looked so surprised (like she didn't know about the question ahead of time) and actually made it look like was startled or something.

All scripted and acted out "professionally".

But the GEM is that she actually said she didn't Know What the Email Issue Was All About


The Iowa Caucuses are next week and She will be on full throttle rebuttal and damage control mode.

Hillary always looks "better" when surrounded by herself.

Hillary Clinton: I Did Not Know What the Email Issue Was All About


“Yes, I think that’s a fair criticism,” Clinton said of the Des Moines Register’s point that she should have apologized for the scandal sooner. “I have no intention of doing anything other than find a convenient way” to communicate, Clinton said. “It turned out not to be so convenient.”

Clinton refused to call it an error in judgment.

“Maybe being faster, trying to figure out what all of this means,” Clinton said, when asked what she could have done differently, suggesting that she did not know what she was doing was wrong and potentially illegal.


the Espionage Act of 1913







She really did break the law. She also used extraordinarily poor judgement in what she did. Playing stupid is probably her only legal defense to these felonies.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 03:43 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Looks like Hillary knows it all right about now !!!




posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I wonder if she suspects Obama yet....
This is a parody video on that. Cheers!


Hillary Clinton "I will survive" Parody



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships



Hillary 2016


It will be HER year !!




posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

Hillary 2016


It will be HER year !!



Perhaps just not quite how she originally imagined/schemed it!


Clinton camp adamantly opposes blocking the release of
SAP Top Secret emails. Have they lost their minds?


The Clinton campaign blasted the decision to withhold the 22 messages as "top secret."

“This is overclassification run amok. We adamantly oppose the complete blocking of the release of these emails,” campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said on Twitter. Appearing on MSNBC after the news broke, Fallon vowed to fight the decision.

Read more at: politi.co...

www.politico.com...




posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

The reason the Campaign is saying this is because they know those emails will never be released because they're highly classified.

Sooowwww Clever aren't they.




posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

Sooowwww Clever aren't they.


Ah yes. Strike while the iron is hot!
Plausible deniability!



posted on Feb, 2 2016 @ 01:53 PM
link   
I like to look at it like this....

1,300 classified emails...

toss out 99% as being 1.) not classified at the time of being received or sent 2.) not being easily recognizable as should have been classified 3.) Over classified 4.) Any other reason you can think of to dismiss them.

That still leaves at a bare minimum, 13 felony count of mishandling of classified information.


Sure she deserves a shot at being commander-in chief, or rather, commander-in-her-own-belief
edit on R532016-02-02T13:53:26-06:00k532Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join