It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Hillary Clinton: I Did Not Know What the Email Issue Was All About

page: 3
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

+1 more 
posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 06:39 PM
Imagine if she got the big chair, and on the first day she walked into the war-room and said "hmmm, I wonder what this big shiny red button does [push]". Once the radioactive dust settled she'd be like "I did not know what the red button did - what difference, at this point, does it make"

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 06:43 PM

originally posted by: vjr1113
i found an interwiew


so shes basically said in public there's nothing in those emails. i gotta say shes going all in now. was it stupid and clumsy? yea. nail in the coffin, not in my opinion.

A Campaign speech.

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 06:47 PM

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: xuenchen

Her being "technologically challenged" is one example of her lying.

Well that, and the fact that State Department urged her and her staff to use instead of her own private email for official email communications.

She just didn't know.

Uninformed boob running the State Sept or liar.. take your choice.

or worse, uninformed boob or liar running the country!

maybe both.
edit on 01 25 2016 by burgerbuddy because: added

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 06:50 PM
a reply to: vjr1113

Here's some indication coming from the State Dept themselves, not the MSM.

State Department seeks extension for Clinton emails release

The SD is under court order to release all the Hillary emails.

They are stalling and *possibly* for at least one good reason....

They must go through and sift out all the classified info.

If no classified info was there, why would they stall the releases?


posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 07:27 PM
a reply to: vjr1113

so basically she made a clumsy mistake by putting classified files on her own server. obviously thats a security risk at most. is that about it?
General David Petraeus, a war hero, was convicted of a crime for doing something similar. And he may even loose a star because of it. It's not a trivial crime.

i youtubed the scandal and its all fox news, im more comfortable with a non fox news explanation.
I seldom look at videos. I prefer print material. However, I agree that if all I could locate were Fox News sources, I would be critical of the information as well.

so shes basically said in public there's nothing in those emails.
That's been her defense all along. Part of her defense has been that some of that data should never have been classified to begin with. Basically she is claiming that what the State Department and the Defense Department consider classified is not the same thing.

However what she considers important or not is not relevant. There have now been public statements made by government officials involved in the investigation that there were email messages found that contained classified data. And some of that data is above top secret, so to speak, which had to be culled from top secret computer systems not even connected to the Internet. And that is a crime approaching the level of Treason or Espionage.


posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 07:36 PM
a reply to: DexterRiley

well poor general. to be fair, he's has a lot of power and should have known better. still sounds like a fine would be more appropriate. war crimes? thats sounds extreme. i wouldnt say he's a bad general because of it, people make mistakes. i guess it depends how high the stakes are. i remember obama saying secret service only lets him have one govt phone, for good reason. obviously we cant enforce every department employee of government. clumsy clumsy people.

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 07:38 PM
if secret service can force the president to have only one phone, this problem Clinton made shouldn't be a problem. still very clumsy considering her position.
edit on 26-1-2016 by vjr1113 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 07:40 PM
link this bumbling explanation... she is contradicting herself

Even David Axelrod speaking out against her latest "lie".

David Alexrod says Hillary Clinton contradicted herself during Monday’s Democratic town hall by claiming her use of a private email server while secretary of state was not a mistake in judgment.

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 08:12 PM
Remember this from 1999, Bill Clinton's presidency?

CIA suspends former director's security clearance

The CIA has suspended the security clearance of former director John Deutch because he kept classified files on an unsecured home computer.

He issued a statement Friday saying that he accepted "responsibility" for his mistake. He said he "never considered the information to be at risk, or intended to violate security procedures. But good intentions simply aren't enough."

The CIA does not usually announce suspensions of security clearances, but did so this time because of prior news coverage about the case, officials said.

They will not be able to excuse Hillary Clinton for doing the exact same thing as Deutch.

She was there in the White House as First Lady when this went down. She knew then and she knows now how risky it is to have a personal server, personal computer, and personal emails for government business, especially State business!!!

So, she knew...she absolutely knew what she was doing...100%!

I am convinced that whatever she got out of keeping that personal server in her home and using personal emails for sensitive government material was worth the risk in her and Bill's minds....maybe even worth going to prison for. Obama will pardon them just as Bill pardoned Deutch, but the damage has been done, and they got away with something.

Why oh why did Obama NOT have an IG in place during her tenure? Ask yourself that! I hope the FBI is asking that, too.

edit on 26-1-2016 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-1-2016 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 08:23 PM
The issue is if any intelligence officer or military officer/soldier did this they would be thrown into mount doom.

it's a security issue.

The people who whine about this topic being brought up again are people who have their ego interwined with democrats. when you see this behavior it should be noted and their future opinions disregarded when talking about politics.

The correct opinion is yes she did do something wrong which would squash the average peon, but we should wait and see what happens.
I just want the truth and I want what is right and wrong. invoking law on ats is truly idiotic and yet again your opinion should be disregarded.

we shall wait and see.

posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 08:33 PM
Hillary Clinton is an extremely intelligent woman.

She was not a wallflower first lady. She was very involved in White House matters during Bill's presidency.

She would have been well aware of what happened to John Deutch and why.

When she pulls her act of the doddering older lady that is technologically-challenged, I want to puke! When she feigns ignorance, I want to scream. She knows the game and she plays it better than anybody else.

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 06:38 AM

originally posted by: TheBulk

Or you support Hillary and cant stand any negative press about her.

Well you got me man. I TOTALLY love that bitch. I love her SOOO much that I've been adamant about wanting to vote for Bernie Sanders for months now. Oh wait no. You are just making terrible assumptions about me because you don't like what I'm saying.

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 09:16 AM
a reply to: Bennyzilla

Trump says mean things that hurt peoples feelings (Not Illegal) = GET HIM

Hillary breaks the law and acts aloof about it = Nothing to see here, move along, petty conservative schemes

The difference is that Hilliary may have broken the law. However when it comes to putting a foot in ones mouth Trump takes the cake, the shrimp...hell he takes the entire buffet. The entire world except his most loyal supporters are shaking their heads and wondering how on Earth is this man is running for Prez.

The guy is talking about building a wall to keep Immigrants out-He was married to immigrants!!!

edit on 27-1-2016 by Thecakeisalie because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 09:58 AM
a reply to: Thecakeisalie

Legal Immigrant

Illegal Immigrant

What difference does it make

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 06:01 PM
a reply to: xuenchen

No difference if they're murderers and rapists.

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 06:25 PM

originally posted by: redoubt

Hillary Clinton: I Did Not Know What the Email Issue Was All About

Just another dip in the cesspool of preferred ignorance by one of our candidates for the highest office of our nation.

At this point in time, I do not see any candidate fully worthy of the title, President of the United States of America.
In fact, I haven't seen one in decades.

The 20th century rendered up four of the finest in history:
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt
- Dwight David Eisenhower
- John Fitzgerald Kennedy
- Ronald Wilson Reagan

To date, the 21st century has offered nothing but liars, political puppets and destroyers of Liberty.

Now here's a debate topic...I'll gladly give you Reagan, Kennedy, and Eisenhower, but my personal opinion is FDR sent us further down a socialist path than Obama did.

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 06:45 PM
a reply to: xuenchen

that's the stupidest thing ive ever read. i know that was a small minded xenophobic comment but it just backfired on you. you are right, makes no difference at all. people are people. you said it.

you cant even be offensive well
edit on 27-1-2016 by vjr1113 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 06:49 PM
a reply to: vjr1113

Oh goodie.

Are we all warm and fuzzy inside now?

I know Hillary is.

She was "pro-choice" with her servers.

And missed the punchline when she was told her personal email was deleted.

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 07:00 PM
a reply to: xuenchen

are you warm and fuzzy? you must have a nice feeling to show your intolerance of anyone that is from a different country. you give the US a bad name, and you wonder why they call us racist.

its fine though, go off topic on immigrants. you dont have the stones to say it to their face so you say it here./editby]
edit on 27-1-2016 by vjr1113 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 27 2016 @ 07:08 PM
she used a private server at home to send and receive emails.
read that back again.
judicial watch, republicans that to date have filed 90 lawsuits against obama, winning one, making public the visitors to the white house, and fox news, fair and balanced?
these two are the most upset that,
she used a private server at home to send and receive emails.

anybody remember swift boats for veterans?

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2    4 >>

log in