It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Still, Dimon said the energy portfolio makes up just a small portion of JPMorgan's balance sheet and many of the loans are backed by physical assets. That means banks can sell off assets to recover money if a company defaults on its loans.
"We're not worried about the big oil companies. These are mostly the smaller ones that you're talking," Dimon said.
Paul Miller, a banking analyst at FBR, said oil loans don't represent nearly the same threat to banks that mortgages did last decade. He also pointed out that banks have been forced to stockpile capital to help them absorb losses.
"The big banks might have 1% to 6% of exposure. That's not going to kill them. This is not like 2006 or 2007," Miller said.
originally posted by: twitchy
a reply to: greencmp
Great post, I'd say that Cartelization started way back when with Standard Oil though.
originally posted by: machineintelligence
The big banks are seriously exposed to loans to oil companies. The oil industry is taking down the biggest banks. It is like we are in the middle of a huge war and the resource providers are beating the crap out of the big banks. Not sure where this is all leading but it looks grim to me at this point for a lot of the world economy as this unfolds.
originally posted by: 727Sky
originally posted by: machineintelligence
The big banks are seriously exposed to loans to oil companies. The oil industry is taking down the biggest banks. It is like we are in the middle of a huge war and the resource providers are beating the crap out of the big banks. Not sure where this is all leading but it looks grim to me at this point for a lot of the world economy as this unfolds.
Back in the 80s when the last oil patch crash happened several banks had to close their doors. Look at Penn Square Bank Oklahoma city, Okla. as a classic example.
Smaller oil companies that sold oil and gas to the majors had "Take or Pay" contracts. When it all went down and the major oil companies did not take the gas or oil and certainly did not pay (sue me was their response) Many of the smaller companies had to shut their wells in and go bankrupt. Millions and billons were lost not to mention all the jobs. The Majors got bigger when the market turned around.. Bigger gets bigger and little gets squished.
originally posted by: greencmp
What I fear now is more centralization, potentially to the point of nationalization. I wouldn't put it past a Sanders administration.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: elementalgrove
That's a wonderful scenario....but how do these workers feed their families in the time it takes to develop those technologies and then blend them in to the infrastructure? Solar is a great idea.....if you ignore the decade it will take to outfit every home, not to mention the cost. Any other breakthroughs will take time and money to build infrastructure to support it and more time to get it in to mass production and then more time to outfit each home and business.
A "technological revolution" is not going to save people NOW.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: elementalgrove
That's a wonderful scenario....but how do these workers feed their families in the time it takes to develop those technologies and then blend them in to the infrastructure? Solar is a great idea.....if you ignore the decade it will take to outfit every home, not to mention the cost. Any other breakthroughs will take time and money to build infrastructure to support it and more time to get it in to mass production and then more time to outfit each home and business.
A "technological revolution" is not going to save people NOW.