It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FredT
I do want to point out one thing. the only serious research article on FMD you pointed out does not point to deminital it does talk about strokes. In addition, the group that it identifed was predominantly young childbearing women.
In regards to vasospasm, I do get the concept as I am a Pediatric Critical Care Transport Nurse
Originally posted by FredT
Quickly, shaken baby syndrom is also usually occopanied by retinal hemmorages. And the charecteristics of brain damage is quite unique to the coup counter coup type injury that occurs. Often other patterns are observed as well such as tissue damage from the impacts.....
[edit on 1/10/05 by FredT]
Originally posted by Ess Why Kay
..you're serious?
soficrow
most Americans soon will lose their voting rights based on "mental incompetence
Originally posted by Nygdan
If over 150 million people loose their voting rights because they're mentally handicapped, and actually listen to it, then they are, de facto, mentally incompetent.
crime of passion n. a defendant's excuse for committing a crime due to sudden anger or heartbreak, in order to eliminate the element of "premeditation." This usually arises in murder or attempted murder cases, when a spouse or sweetheart finds his/her "beloved" having sexual intercourse with another and shoots or stabs one or both of the coupled pair. To make this claim the defendant must have acted immediately upon the rise of passion, without the time for contemplation or allowing for "a cooling of the blood." It is sometimes called the "Law of Texas" since juries in that state are supposedly lenient to cuckolded lovers who wreak their own vengeance. The benefit of eliminating premeditation is to lessen the provable homicide to manslaughter with no death penalty and limited prison terms. An emotionally charged jury may even acquit the impassioned defendant.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Why on Earth would anyone think they had the right to kill their spouse, separated or not because they caught that person cheating on them?
That indicates to me they had a feeling of ownership over the other person, and "their" property was behaving badly.