It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LUXOR, Egypt (AP) - A team of researchers briefly removed King Tut's mummy from its tomb Wednesday and laid bare his bones for a CT scan that could solve an enduring mystery: Was it murder or natural causes that killed Egypt's boy pharaoh 3,000 years ago?
CAIRO (Reuters) - Egyptologist Zahi Hawass, who supervised the first CT scan of the mummy of the boy pharaoh Tutankhamun this week, said the experience suggested it might be unwise to write off the legendary "curse of the pharaohs."
The CT, or computed tomography, scan produced three-dimensional images X-ray of the boy pharaoh's remains.
"I cannot dismiss the legend of the curse because today many things happened. We almost had an accident in a car, the wind blew up in the Valley of the Kings and the computer of the CT scan was completely stopped for two hours," Hawass said in videotaped remarks released by his office on Friday.
Hawass, well known around the world for his enthusiastic television appearances in documentaries on ancient Egypt, has previously spoken about spooky experiences he has had while excavating tombs and taking mummies out of sarcophagi.
"I think we should still believe in the curse of the pharaohs," he said from the tomb of Tutankhamun.
There was also mention that there is some belief that instead of being the son of Akhenaten he may have been his half-brother -- that is something I hadn't heard before - have you?
Originally posted by Gazrok
There was also mention that there is some belief that instead of being the son of Akhenaten he may have been his half-brother -- that is something I hadn't heard before - have you?
Supposedly, Tut had the same birth defects as Akhenaton did (forget the condition, but large feet, elongated head, etc.) and that would be more likely if he was his son, rather than half-brother.
[edit on 7-1-2005 by Gazrok]
Originally posted by Gazrok
Supposedly, Tut had the same birth defects as Akhenaton did (forget the condition, but large feet, elongated head, etc.) and that would be more likely if he was his son, rather than half-brother. [edit on 7-1-2005 by Gazrok]
Doesn't anybody else think this skull is abnormal?
Abraham Lincoln didn't look anything like this...