Do Atheist Bow to Anthromophism?

a reply to: Kashai
I'm done.

a reply to: peter vlar

That might have something to do with the fact that I have to interest in discussing my life with you beyond what I mentioned.

Perhaps you should post your personal data on the internet and see how that works out for you.

a reply to: Grimpachi

I presented that data in relation to the Closet Agnostic response and include you in that conclusion.

Any thoughts?

a reply to: Grimpachi

I agree you guys need to stop pretending that Atheism makes any more sense than religions.


Get over that.

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: peter vlar

That might have something to do with the fact that I have to interest in discussing my life with you beyond what I mentioned.

Perhaps you should post your personal data on the internet and see how that works out for you.

I wasn't asking for personal data. That would be against ATS T&C and is an offense that would get me banned. With that said, you demanded other peoples credentials despite not having any of your own. Hypocrite much? This entire thread is akin to having a discussion with a child. Or the affluenza kid. You either refuse to learn a damned thing or you're a complete and total liar based on your posts in this thread. You can continue to believe your entirely falsified world view all day long, it doesn't change the fact that you keep going on about things you don't have an iota of knowledge on yet state them all as fact.
You keep telling other people what it is they believe despite your assertions being incorrect on multiple levels.
You redefine things to fit your confirmation bias
You quote science that you don't understand and get it wrong. Every time.
You make assertions that you either can't or won't support( Stanford is to philosophy what Oxford is to Physics) because they are 100% wrong.
You have shifted the goal posts multiple times because your thesis rest upon a foundation of quicksand.
Your OP doesn't even use the correct word that the premise you are claiming rest upon. And it's not a typo or an issue with spellcheck because you have repeated anthromophism throughout the entirety of this thread.
You demonstrate shocking ignorance as to how the scientific method works and flat out refuse to learn anything.
When asked to support your position you give essays from blogs and list personal anecdotes that are irrelevant to the discussion( you allege that you worked in a school where juveniles were accused of class A felonies but not convicted...sounds like a miscarriage of justice and null due process and none of it pertains to the discussion) it's all smoke, mirrors and deflection from the inadequacies of your position.
You make assertions regarding statements made by posters that don't even bear a passing resemblance to the actual statements they have made( the one regarding poster wolf`147 that you referenced in your earlier reply).

Best of luck to you and your web of bull dung. As you are unwilling to have a mature discussion on the topic (telling people to "get over it" when they are correct and your glaring errors are pointed out is beyond childish), there really isn't anything to discuss. If you decide you ever want to actually expand your knowledge as opposed to mashing people when confronted on your cognitive dissonance, feel free to let me know.

a reply to: peter vlar

Best to you and the obvious fact that Atheism is based upon Intuitions and Anthromophism is clear in your response.

The rest of you response is to disgusting to treat as relevant.

Any thoughts?

Sorry I haven't been able to reply. In the middle of moving homes.

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: peter vlar

Best to you and the obvious fact that Atheism is based upon Intuitions and Anthromophism is clear in your response.

He never even mentioned atheism in his post. So I have no idea how your statement would even remotely apply to Peter vlar's words.

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: peter vlar
The rest of you response is to disgusting to treat as relevant.

I'm not sure how the validity and behaviour of the OP couldn't be relevant to the thread when both traits have been continuously abused to an extent that I have never witnessed.

There's a reason why this thread is on page 17 and only has 3 flags. There's a reason why the number of posts you have verses the accumulated number of stars you attained both in this thread as well as throughout your time on ATS is one of the most negative I have ever seen.

It's due to the fact that you are one of two things. You're either one of the largest, most persistent trolls here in ATS, or you're one of its least intelligent members. I would say that your clear frustration of being proven wrong so many times and thus resorting to true 'troll nature' by posting completely off topic posts clearly shows that your trait resides in the latter of the two written above; you wouldn't be frustrated if you didn't truly believe in the outright insane conclusions you've come to, after all.

Trust me when I say that I would love for you to prove me wrong, as I would actually have some atom-sized level of respect for you if you came out and showed that you were just pulling our leg this whole time. Alas, the chances of that are beyond slim, and, how could I even believe you after all this anyway?

I agree, Peter vlar's words are disgusting. But, they are disgusting because what they say are accurate.

I haven't read the topic since I last posted, however, if history is bound to repeat itself: people with intellect have responded to your blazingly inaccurate comments and misunderstood information with courtesy, facts, and reasoning, whilst you had your new-information-blinders on to every word they wrote.

Thanks for allowing us to expose what may be the least valuable member to ATS. I do not wish you a good bye, because frankly, someone of your stature has not shown that they've earned that level of mutual respect. The only hope I have for you is that one day your massive wall of impenetrable matter within your mind that prevents you from learning even the most basic and obviously factual information will begin to crack.

Until then, enjoy being the most ignorant individual I have ever heard of.

Wolf147....

What it comes to religious extremists you fit the characteristics of one.

Get over it.

Any thoughts?

a reply to: Ghost147

Isn't it amazing how the troll,,ahem, OP, refuses to acknowledge anything outside of their extraordinarily narrow and myopic worldview? Let alone address any of the legitimate criticism given based on how schizophrenic the posting is, the absolute ignorance to basic high school science and a rabid glut of knowledge regarding the English language and rules of grammar. The entire thread is a farce from front to back and lost any entertainment value pages ago. Though some of it must be getting through to the poster because there isa definitive change in tone and attitude the last few pages.

Just for the hell of it I went back to page one to reread the thread and see just where this thing went off the rails. It started right there on page one. There hasn't been a coherent reply since the OP by this person and the vast majority of them do nothing but move the goal posts around to the point that were in the middle of a soccer stadium wearing baseball mitts.

It's too bad that there are such uneducated, willfully ignorant and scientifically illiterate people in this world and especially on ATS. I originally came here to learn from people that knew more than I did and naively thought that most others felt the same way. That isn't the case at all with this poster. Hey are more concerned with maintaining their own fault filled POV in defiance towards reality than they are interested in learning a damned thing. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic.

a reply to: peter vlar

Also a reply indicative of religious extremism.

You guys really think what you said makes any sense.

a reply to: Kashai

Sshhhhhhhhh... I'm talking to the grownups now.

a reply to: Kashai

BTW its spelt Anthropomorphism, I thought English was your first language?

That Anthromophismis not applicable to God in any real way is philosophically or otherwise relatable to any potential and in general definition of God

I dont get where your going with this, however in response to the above; I could see how anthropomorphism is part of the human psyche. Our creator gods test tubed us, dumped us on this planet...not ever answering our direct prayer/supplications ever again. We have intellect, ingenuity and yet we still act like sheep.

a reply to: Kashai

The Existence of God is a matter of Faith

and yet you wrote rather forcefully this...

There is no real reason at present to conclude that what we today, generally define as random in fact really is.

In other words in your worldview there is random...and there is Random. Wow

a reply to: peter vlar

Why bother replying to those who neither read nor comprehend you posts? There used to be many theists on here that I could have intelligent debates and conversations with, but most of them seem to have disappeared. The conversations were not nonsense like these where someone makes up their own definitions of things and tries to shove it down your throat. (Haha Seems to apply)

Do you remember Charles1952? I had some really good conversations with him on here. I don't know if I changed his mind on any of the issues, but some of the things he said did get me to change my perception a bit.

Now every few months what we get is a crackpot trying to redefine what Atheism is. It is like they think if they can redefine a word they can change the fact that people don't believe in deities.

Unbelievers maybe that will be the next thing they try to redefine.

a reply to: Grimpachi

when I have better and far more rational conversations with posters like Randyvs than have occurred in the OP...yeah. I remember Charles1952. I doubt anyone had changed his mind but he was at least willing to have a mature dialogue and didn't make things up on the fly.

a reply to: Kashai

No because Communism/Atheism failed miserably in those countries and were replaced with Socialistic Oligarchies

Ever since the creation of the USSR (1922) there was the jewish element who continued to hold great power in Russia, the Orthodox church was tolerated. Communism failed when the money ran out. The Berlin wall was the beginning. Coca-Cola, McDonalds and other large corps needing new markets sealed Russias fate.

No such thing as a socialist Oligarchy - the Oligarchy raped Govt assets much like privatisation of Public assets does in the West (in the name of "lower prices -and competition/NOT!)

Atheism/religion doesnt get much say when the Money talks. You really should study more.

a reply to: peter vlar

Actually nothing on the fly; the fact of matter is you really have no idea as to what you are talking about. I mean its actually hilarious that you claim dictionary definition suffice in fact to reality.

This in relation to posting at Forums is about the best New Years I have ever had in my life.

You closet agnostics has seriously made my day.

Happy New Year and may God protect you

Any thoughts?

a reply to: peter vlar

It is too bad that most of the stuff now is so crazy that no one can follow. Some of these threads it is like they do not even speak a known language.

a reply to: Kashai

I have one....

Quit saying any thoughts!

Happy new year everyone