It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: intrptr
That's if the 38. is for protection and not collection though.
If it was for protection circumstances I'd probably go with a 22. or maybe a standard black 9mm.
The "beatifully crafted" I mentioned would be collectors items.
Not exactly. The background check is a simple phone call and is almost instantaneous. The record of your purchase is not kept by the feds, but by the dealer, which is required to keep it for something like 20 years.
I like a .357 because you can still use the less expensive .38 ammunition, but it can handle a heavier .357 round as well.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Bluntone22
what if it's too late and ISIS already got Santa?
Our guns are useless at that point! What about the children!!!!!!?
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Metallicus
I like a .357 because you can still use the less expensive .38 ammunition, but it can handle a heavier .357 round as well.
Practice with the same ammo you plan on carrying. Stick to one type, be surer of your target as well as your background.
.357 over penetrates. Neighbors might not appreciate that.
Edit: And you might be blinded by your own muzzle flash at night.
The "beautifully crafted" I mentioned would be collectors items.
Personally though, if I wanted a gun I'd buy one, legal or not, I'm not gonna let the government decide if I can defend myself.
Hasn't been worth my while as of yet.
Is there any sources of what mental health issues are considered a no no for gun ownership.
originally posted by: intrptr
Thats paraphrased… but means have you ever been clinically diagnosed with any of a plethora of psychological problems like schizophrenia, for instance.
originally posted by: vor78
originally posted by: intrptr
Thats paraphrased… but means have you ever been clinically diagnosed with any of a plethora of psychological problems like schizophrenia, for instance.
I think it actually takes a court order declaring a person mentally ill/defective (or a stint in a mental institution) for a person to be prohibited from firearms ownership. The wording both in federal law and on 4473 uses the word 'adjudicated'.