posted on Sep, 28 2015 @ 04:13 PM
Sorry, but the evidence in this case is far from weak. The guy damned himself repeatedly, was planning on cutting up and disposing of the body, went
and bought a saw, plastic and tons of bleach, lied to the police about when he last saw the guy repeatedly (Told them he met with him after he had
been killed) Lied about the room his boss stayed in to hide the body. Told the maids they were not allowed to clean the downstairs rooms he would
take care of them that week, something he had never done before, again to keep the body from being discovered. Gave the police false information to
send them elsewhere in the search for the missing dead man. Had half the money stolen from the daed guy in his room, the hired killer had the other
half. And on and on.
He was stealing from his boss at the hotel he ran for him, got caught and had the retarded guy he hired to do maintenance to kill him. I don't have
the link, but read the court documents on this case. It was a no brainer for the jury. Very short deliberation.
As with the majority of cases that I hear about like this the anti-death penalty people lie like no other to get the public on their side and Joe
public never looking at the actual facts buys into the lies. For instance in one a couple of years ago they went on and on about the main witness
changing his story 20 years later in a retrial, that change was, " I am sorry I don't remember exactly now what he said but I stand by my earlier
testimony" After 20 years would you remember everything that happen exactly to the point you would swear in a court where the defense will be
comparing it to what you said 20 years ago? I think not.