It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Should we remove the nonprofit status of the Roman Catholic Church if they disallow their priests to be married, or refuse to hire women into the position?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
So why are your jimmies rustled?
The bill specifically protects those who believe that marriage is between "one man and one woman" or that "sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage."
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Should we remove the nonprofit status of the Roman Catholic Church if they disallow their priests to be married, or refuse to hire women into the position?
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Should we remove the nonprofit status of the Roman Catholic Church if they disallow their priests to be married, or refuse to hire women into the position?
They are a church. They are allowed to discriminate. The government can't intrude. We're talking about a tax-paying company.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Essentially it is an end run around the gay marriage thing. It wouldn't pass muster upon judicial challenge. And certainly no one would vote for it.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Essentially it is an end run around the gay marriage thing. It wouldn't pass muster upon judicial challenge. And certainly no one would vote for it.
On that, we agree.
I just have judgments about the "party of smaller government" doing everything they can to make more laws that meddle in people's private and personal lives.
I HEARTILY ACCEPT the motto, — "That government is best which governs least";(1) and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe, — "That government is best which governs not at all"; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient.
But, to speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men,(4) I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it.
originally posted by: tinymind
a reply to: CB328
Well, so much for "personal responsibility" and a smaller government.
I guess we can all start living outside to make it easier for the government to keep an eye on ALL of our activities.