It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Possible All Top Secret biological and chemical experiments done by US internally before 1998.

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 13 2015 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: makemap
www.whiteoutpress.com...

This list was 1997 and before, it also seems incomplete. Who knows what is happening in the US internally right now?

In 2001 Iraq war American/possible Allies army was using Uranium rounds against Saddam's army. It is considered a radiation weapon.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Don't forget them Ticks.. Ticks is an invasive species and doesn't belong in North America. They came from Africa. Brought to you by Nazi scientists and American traitors. Land of the free is going to be land of the parasites.

www.youtube.com...

nstarzone.com...

www.governor.ny.gov...

www.torontosun.com...

You see rabies does not exist in the past, now it does all over North America.

www.rabiesfree.org...

Who knows what other experiments is out there.. Maybe Flu??


The thing with Bots is that they will target a single point/mistake you make to try and discredit your thread yet they always seem to not worry about the other fact's that you provide like the militaries are intentionally poisoning its own citizens and would rather argue over an insignificant point like you got the rabies thing wrong.

This is a really handy way to negotiate this site and see who the bots/trolls are as you know they are not normal humans (If there Is such a thing) when you provide evidence that the government are causing genocide on a monumental basis in so many different ways from the spraying you point out to the use of tarmac on our roads and fluoride in the water to target people with diabetes and kidney disease then you see what's really going on.
It Is also a lesson for you in how to deal with the truth as it needs to be exact as possible as you will end up being discredited but the genuine ones amongst us know the truth which could also mean you are just preaching to the converted although every now and again you can slip a right hook through there defence and cause them immense damage trust me I've done it a few times, now when these types of sites start hiding your posts and you don't get allowed onto forums you know you are pretty much right on the money.




posted on Jul, 13 2015 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: makemap

originally posted by: Bedlam

You DO realize that "60% of the radioactivity" means it's LESS radioactive than uranium, right? By almost half?
'

It has radioactivity from uranuim it is still considered a radiation weapon. The Iraqi's and US vets all got cancer coming back. 60% may seen that much. But, 60% plus 100+ shells is enough to irradiate you to death.


DU isn't radioactive enough to cause illness if you slept in a bed of it for the rest of your life. It's only considered a 'radiation weapon' by cranks. And no, not all US vets got cancer. Hard to believe that you let that statement fly.

Ever eat a banana? Is IT a radiation weapon?



Your more ignorant on me about ticks. biggest denier ever. Radioactivity is not natural for the planet.


I note that you never ponied up a date on when the tick bioweapon was supposedly wielded. I've got pages from books in the 1850s discussing cattle ticks in Texas.

And yes, radioactivity is totally natural. You can't find a place where there is none. Where do you think uranium comes from?

See also: background radiation.



You don't see WW2 vets coming back and dying after WW2. That is because radiation weapons weren't even invented that time until the nuclear bombs.


Odd, I've got relatives who died from phosphorus pentoxide exposure in WW2.



Radioactive = radiation weaponry. Just like mustard gas being considered as "chemical" weapon even though it isn't liquid.

There is a "radioactive" sign for a reason. It should be on those DU rounds.


You...you think only liquids are chemicals?

Bananas are radioactive. Are they radiation weapons?
edit on 13-7-2015 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 04:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bedlam
You DO realize that "60% of the radioactivity" means it's LESS radioactive than uranium, right? By almost half?
'
DU isn't radioactive enough to cause illness if you slept in a bed of it for the rest of your life. It's only considered a 'radiation weapon' by cranks. And no, not all US vets got cancer. Hard to believe that you let that statement fly.



Do you want to tell that to my friend who is being treated by 12 of the top specialists in Australia for uranium poisoning or would you want to tell that to the 25 widows of the seals that served alongside him in the Australian military.

Things are hidden for a very long time when it comes to the military intentionally poisoning its own soldiers and population,
have a look at the link where the british were spraying bacteria over the british population for 39 years oh of course you just want to promote the propaganda that evil uses and hides behind Why did it have to have a 30 year secrecy gag put onto it?
the military is primarily used to kill Its own countries citizens the amount of PTSD that some of my friends are suffering from is unbelievable and the military don't want to know them. There is absolutely no reason for war as we have a word in the English language called negotiation most wars are fought over food the others are fought to put pipelines through countries or secure minerals in the ground. yes some tribes are fighting over disagreements hundreds of years ago but they are fairly rare.
they also use humans for testing to make us out of silicon and how many times did countries test the nuclear bomb what differences did they expect,
We also know that the militaries were behind all the terrorist groups in Europe between 1940 and 1990 with operation gladio



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 04:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: makemap
It has radioactivity from uranuim it is still considered a radiation weapon.


It is? According to who exactly?


The Iraqi's and US vets all got cancer


So now you claim every soldier in Iraq got cancer.... do yo ever stop to actually think about the crap you post?


Radioactivity is not natural for the planet.


More nonsense from you, what about Oklo? What about Potassium-40 in granite?


There is a "radioactive" sign for a reason. It should be on those DU rounds.


DU has about half the radioactivity as natural Uranium.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 11:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bedlam


DU isn't radioactive enough to cause illness if you slept in a bed of it for the rest of your life. It's only considered a 'radiation weapon' by cranks. And no, not all US vets got cancer. Hard to believe that you let that statement fly.

Ever eat a banana? Is IT a radiation weapon?

I note that you never ponied up a date on when the tick bioweapon was supposedly wielded. I've got pages from books in the 1850s discussing cattle ticks in Texas.

And yes, radioactivity is totally natural. You can't find a place where there is none. Where do you think uranium comes from?

Odd, I've got relatives who died from phosphorus pentoxide exposure in WW2.

You...you think only liquids are chemicals?

Bananas are radioactive. Are they radiation weapons?


I don't even know who is thumbing you up. But you are obviously full of disinformation or disinfo agent.

Your the biggest idiot in this thread ranting about the real truth of radiation. I like to see you eat uranuim. We have potassium pills but, no uranuim pills. Potassium is the natural food/radiation for human.
Comparing radiation with chemical weapon is an extremely bad example. What is worst radiation or chemical? Obviously radiation because you can't clean the crap out of it and it stays there for an extremely long time.

What part did I say liquids are the only chemical weapon? It was merely an example.. There is a difference between chemical weapons and radiation weapons. If there wasn't there wouldn't be a radioactive sign and radiation would be considered as chemical weapon. Radiation weapon is use of radiation to kill. What, you want the DU shell to be considered as chemical weapon like WW2 tank shell?

It has radioactivity so it is still considered as a radiation weapon just like Nuclear bomb.

en.wikipedia.org...

Qoute: "A radiological weapon or radiological dispersion device (RDD) is any weapon that is designed to spread radioactive material with the intent to kill and cause disruption."

As someone posting on a thread against my tick info without giving a single evidence or example unlike the others. This is ATS. To search for truth and info. Ranting isn't going to help without evidence to help back up.

Are you talking about sleeping next to a DU shell that had exploded or not? If not then it is just like sleeping next to a nuclear bomb that hasn't blown up yet. 60% radioactivity doesn't mean it isn't radio active. It is tank shell and meant to destroy tanks and buildings. At 1000 plus uses it can have more radiation than a single nuclear bomb because it will stack up/increase radiation in the area per shot.

I rest my case. You better not start posting more idiotic examples without evidence.
edit on 14-7-2015 by makemap because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2015 @ 10:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: makemap
I don't even know who is thumbing you up. But you are obviously full of disinformation or disinfo agent.


Or you are totally clueless, and don't recognize it.



Your the biggest idiot in this thread ranting about the real truth of radiation. I like to see you eat uranuim. We have potassium pills but, no uranuim pills. Potassium is the natural food/radiation for human.


Is English your second language? As I said upthread, uranium is chemically toxic. That's the main way natural uranium kills you. It's not very radioactive. That's why it still exists. Its specific activity is very low.

Potassium 40 is a beta emitter. A beta emitter is a beta emitter. There aren't natural/good ones and evil ones.



Comparing radiation with chemical weapon is an extremely bad example. What is worst radiation or chemical? Obviously radiation because you can't clean the crap out of it and it stays there for an extremely long time.


Uranium doesn't kill you with radiation, because the specific activity is quite low. It is, however, quite chemically toxic.



What part did I say liquids are the only chemical weapon? It was merely an example..


That would not be what I asked. I asked if you thought all chemicals were liquids. Because you wrote "just like mustard gas being considered as "chemical" weapon even though it isn't liquid." I'm trying to find where your education ended on the subject to establish a common ground.



There is a difference between chemical weapons and radiation weapons. If there wasn't there wouldn't be a radioactive sign and radiation would be considered as chemical weapon. Radiation weapon is use of radiation to kill. What, you want the DU shell to be considered as chemical weapon like WW2 tank shell?


DU isn't used to cause casualties by means of radiation. Because it isn't very radioactive. DU is used because it's very dense, and it's pyrophoric, and we have a bunch of it, and it's relatively inexpensive compared to, say, osmium, when used as an armor penetrator.

Vaporized DU causes casualties by chemical poisoning.



It has radioactivity so it is still considered as a radiation weapon just like Nuclear bomb.


Then you have to include the dreaded sharpened frozen banana, or a blow to the head with a piece of Mexican orange glazed pottery.





Qoute: "A radiological weapon or radiological dispersion device (RDD) is any weapon that is designed to spread radioactive material with the intent to kill and cause disruption."


Then you're in trouble, because DU isn't used to kill or cause disruption by means of its radioactivity.



As someone posting on a thread against my tick info without giving a single evidence or example unlike the others. This is ATS. To search for truth and info. Ranting isn't going to help without evidence to help back up.


You're basically clueless about the subject.



Are you talking about sleeping next to a DU shell that had exploded or not? If not then it is just like sleeping next to a nuclear bomb that hasn't blown up yet. 60% radioactivity doesn't mean it isn't radio active. It is tank shell and meant to destroy tanks and buildings. At 1000 plus uses it can have more radiation than a single nuclear bomb because it will stack up/increase radiation in the area per shot.


As demonstrated by this comment.

edit on 15-7-2015 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2015 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: makemap
Radioactivity is not natural for the planet.

This one statement destroys any potential credibility you may have had, and shows that you haven't actually got a damn clue what you're talking about....




top topics



 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join