It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Adorkable2001
After I recognized him, he started talking in hushed tones like he didn't want anyone knowing who he was.
That is how con artists operate.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: borntowatch
Why wouldn't he be a free man? It isn't illegal to publicly lie and distort the truth.
Be the bigger man than you claim, watch his videos and then rebut them.
You could even prove him wrong and I would have to join your ranks of the scientific religious
Talk is loud but empty, evidence is something you cant argue. KS you are a ringing bell with nothing but noise, sorry, baseless nothing.
I call mine a faith, you say science is your foundation but I havnt seen you offer anything but assumption....ever.
originally posted by: jimmyx
he tried to skirt the currency reporting laws, plain and simple...he had a jury trial, and he was only convicted on one charge...might want to dial this back a little....he wasn't doing god's work by not following those laws, and god did not get him out of jail, the prosecution wasn't able to make a good enough case to the jury on the other charges.
Kent Hovind wasn't put in jail for what he said, he was put in jail for what he did. He broke the law by evading taxes. This is a perfect example of a "persecution complex". Let's ignore what the guy actually did wrong and instead focus on what the bible says about persecution. If you evade taxes, you're arrested, no matter what you preach.
It seems as though you are confusing the word evidence with the word proof. Evidence is not proof and proof is not evidence. There is more evidence in support of evolution than there is evidence in support of the creation account in Genesis, but there is no proof per se of either. Evolution has the entire fossil record containing thousands if not millions of different fossils and species, the creation account in Genesis has... well, itself. That's it.
But what is the big lie of evolution? You can't just tell me that Genesis trumps evolutionary science. Convince me, tell me. What?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Adorkable2001
[quote
That is how con artists operate.
originally posted by: Seede
What?a reply to: amazing
But what is the big lie of evolution? You can't just tell me that Genesis trumps evolutionary science. Convince me, tell me. What?
You dare me ? I double dare you. Childish? Somewhat. You have the same access to the same books that most all have. You chose your path and others will choose their path. Only you can convince yourself.
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Does theory of evolution include gods?
Yes - Have heard it said that way.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Seede
What?a reply to: amazing
But what is the big lie of evolution? You can't just tell me that Genesis trumps evolutionary science. Convince me, tell me. What?
You dare me ? I double dare you. Childish? Somewhat. You have the same access to the same books that most all have. You chose your path and others will choose their path. Only you can convince yourself.
I have read and continue to read. I've been looking into Ancient Sumerian Texts recently and how they relate to genesis...I read multiple evolution and science blogs. You have the same books and resources available to you as I do. Why is it that we have a difference in opinion on Evolution? I still think it's a great theory and the best we have...much better than Dinosaurs on the Ark and God Created the Earth in seven days.
Hovind has a little knowledge in many areas while most of those who oppose him have much knowledge in few areas
originally posted by: borntowatch
Hi Amazing
if you would like to watch a great video about creation and the scientific evidence that supports it then please watch some of Hovinds videos, very easily accessible on youtube.
Hovind has debated many scientists teachers and panels and he has run rings around them, in most cases making them look foolish, ignorant and petulant.
Its very funny to see how much anger he can stir up just by challenging a persons belief with hard solid evidence and proof
One of the main reasons Hovind wins these debates is he is learned across many fields and has a great reference system. Hovind has a little knowledge in many areas while most of those who oppose him have much knowledge in few areas
If you want to see the evidence and proof of creationism then watch his series of videos, when evolutionists say creation has no evidence its just ignorance.
Evolution as it stands is based on assumption,no proof or evidence
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: borntowatch
Hovind has a little knowledge in many areas while most of those who oppose him have much knowledge in few areas
I agree, Hovind has little knowledge in the area of evolution while the people he is debating have much knowledge in that area, which is usually why he is the one made a fool of. You can't properly debate something you don't understand, and Hovind does not understand evolution.
originally posted by: mOjOm
You are so dishonest it's unbelievable. Multiple people here have had debated you on this subject over and over and all you do is deny all evidence that is shown to you. If there is so much evidence for Creationism then why is it that when so many have repeatedly asked you to provide any do you provide absolutely ZERO Evidence. NONE. Not one bit other than your opinions.
I'm going to watch your video by the way and have a huge laugh at this guys supposed Evidence of Creationism.
You're statement about Evolution having "No Evidence" and only Assumption is a flat out lie and you know it. Whether or not you accept the evidence it has isn't the point. To say it has none is a flat out lie.