It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Verum1quaere
Ah yes, the quote mine. The bastion of Creationists trying to make it sound like scientists agree with Christianity.
originally posted by: Verum1quaere
Kent is a triple threat to tptb: he is sober-minded, Christian and the science is on his side...
Creation Seminar 1 - Kent Hovind - Age of the Earth
youtu.be...
AND the truth he speaks goes beyond the bogus science of "evolution":
Overpopulation. GMO Foods. Magnetic Fields. Astronomy - Kent Hovind
youtu.be...
originally posted by: Verum1quaere
Kent is a triple threat to tptb: he is sober-minded, Christian and the science is on his side...
and real scientists are on Kent's side:
originally posted by: Verum1quaere
Kent is a triple threat to tptb: he is sober-minded, Christian and the science is on his side...
Creation Seminar 1 - Kent Hovind - Age of the Earth
youtu.be...
AND the truth he speaks goes beyond the bogus science of "evolution":
Overpopulation. GMO Foods. Magnetic Fields. Astronomy - Kent Hovind
youtu.be...
Given the rate at which cosmic dust accumulates, 4.5 billion years would have produced a layer on the moon much deeper than observed. By implication, the earth is also young.
The existence of short-period comets means that the universe is less than 10,000 years old. Comets and meteoroids only last from 10,000-15,000 years before they are blown apart by the solar wind.
There are no fossil meteorites in the geologic record. If the latter were laid down over billions of years we would expect to find at least a few fossil meteorites in the geologic strata. Therefore, the geologic record was deposited rapidly.
Two Swedish scientists made the first positive identification of a fossilized stony meteorite (Astronomy, June 1981). Per Thorslund and Frans Wickman reported in Nature that a 10 centimeter object found in a limestone slab from a quarry in Brunflo, central Sweden in 1952 is really a stony meteorite as demonstrated by microscopic examinations and other properties. It has a terrestrial age of about 463 million years. The object had until recently been mistaken for something else. If the odds were not bent enough, it appears that the meteorite hit an Ordovician mollusk which is fossilized in conjunction with the meteorite! (Spratt and Stephens, 1992, p.53)
Twelve more meteorites have been found at the Thorsberg Limestone Quarry in Sweden:
A 10-foot-thick section of the Holen ("Orthoceratite") Limestone, of Early Middle Ordovician age, is extracted at the Thorsberg quarry and sawed into thin slabs that are used for window sills and floor tile. Quarry workers discarded slabs with impurities, such as the meteorites, until Professor Maurits Lindström of the University of Stockhom alerted them to save such slabs. The 12 specimens were recovered between 1992 and 1996. Ten of the specimens were recovered from a 2-foot-thick bed of limestone and may represent a single meteorite fall. The other three specimens were recovered from two separate levels above this layer. Seven of the specimens, collected between 1993 and 1996, are from a quarried limestone volume of no more than about 127,000 cubic feet. Most of the specimens are now on display at the Stiftelsen Paleo Geology Center in Lidköping, Sweden. ... The dark, reddish brown meteorite masses [from 0.5 to 3.5 inches in diameter] look like iron nodules surrounded by a zone of lighter colored limestone and would be mistaken by many people for common sedimentary features.
The Moon contains considerable quantities of U-236 and Th-230, both of which are short-lived isotopes that would have expired long ago if the Moon were 4.5 billion years old.
I have read and continue to read. I've been looking into Ancient Sumerian Texts recently and how they relate to genesis...I read multiple evolution and science blogs. You have the same books and resources available to you as I do. Why is it that we have a difference in opinion on Evolution? I still think it's a great theory and the best we have...much better than Dinosaurs on the Ark and God Created the Earth in seven days.
originally posted by: Seede
. a reply to: amazing
I have read and continue to read. I've been looking into Ancient Sumerian Texts recently and how they relate to genesis...I read multiple evolution and science blogs. You have the same books and resources available to you as I do. Why is it that we have a difference in opinion on Evolution? I still think it's a great theory and the best we have...much better than Dinosaurs on the Ark and God Created the Earth in seven days.
[b]It could be that your choice of books is vastly different than my choice of books. That is why I said that only you can convince yourself. Evolution is probably the best you have simply because your choice is drawn to that source. If that is your choice then so be it. If you need to bolster your belief that this formed world is millions or billions of years old without proof of that assumption then so be it. I have yet to see the scientific proof of the formed world being millions of years old. That is an assumption just as six thousand years is also an assumption. That assumption, in time, becomes a lie told so many times that it become truth. Now dinosaurs is another matter for another day.