It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the politics of the People's Republic of China, the Central People's Government forms one of three interlocking branches of power, the others being the Communist Party of China and the People's Liberation Army.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: gosseyn
The only solution if we don't want one day to be living is the sort of dystopia found in science-fiction is to abolish the market little by little. You have to realize that the market is not useful anymore for a series of activities, because we have attained a level technological prowess that makes the market obsolete. If you don't want to become one day a slave to a corporation, you have to make it so that your survival isn't tied to anything that has to do with the market. The first step IMO is to nationalize food production, let's say produce 50 different sorts of vegetables and fruits, until it becomes a public service, etc.. Then if you want a ferrari, you are free to become a slave to the market, it would be your choice.
Because nationalizing food production has done so well before, right?
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: introvert
Actually yes it is Communist..........
In the politics of the People's Republic of China, the Central People's Government forms one of three interlocking branches of power, the others being the Communist Party of China and the People's Liberation Army.
I mean a 2 second google search could fix that
Do you ever know what youre talking about or do you just spout random crap for the sake of argument?
Just because you want to say it to be inflammatory doesnt make it true
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: JeanPaul
I've heard those excuses before. They are nonsense.
I have lived under Socialist regimes. I know — intimately and in detail — how they work, or rather, don't work.
Have you read Marx? I have. A great writer, which is why so many fell under his spell. But he was a fantasist, not a realist, and his view of the world and of humanity was entirely fanciful, made up out of whole cloth. Apply logic and factual scrutiny to his arguments and they fall to pieces, just as all would-be Socialist and Communist regimes around the world have done — except, of course, for Cuba and North Korea, the exceptions that prove the rule. Brilliant examples of Marxist social engineering, aren't they?
Give it a rest, Jean-Paul. Marx was a great man in his way, and a revolutionary philosophy of some kind was desperately needed in Europe in his time; you could say, as he no doubt would have, that his appearance on the scene was a historical inevitability. But his work is done, his era is past, and it is high time his ideas were given a decent burial. Capitalism, too, is tottering on its pins — but we shan't need Marx to deliver the quietus.
I suspect that the future, like the past, belongs to absolutism. Given the magnitude of the challenge posed by overpopulation and climate change, it is probably the only form of government that can ensure our survival as a species.
Freedom, equality and democracy are fine things indeed, but they are summer's fruits, and the summer of human civilization is drawing to a close. Winter, as they say on a certain popular TV show, is coming.
originally posted by: Azureblue
a reply to: JeanPaul
Perhaps I'm missing something but I've never seen the point of whether or not the NWO is communist, capitalist or whatever else. I just do not understand what difference it makes what its orientation is???????
Would love to know what difference it makes.
To my way of thinking it doesn't make any difference what race, colour creed, hair colour, DNA, or whaterver ********* else the person is who is going to screw you does it?????????????????????
Someone please explain what difference it makes or what I've missed.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ketsuko
So, China does not exactly have a "capitalist" economy.
Correct. It is not a truly free-market capitalist system. I never claimed that it was. But it is no where near a communist economic system.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: introvert
Actually yes it is Communist..........
In the politics of the People's Republic of China, the Central People's Government forms one of three interlocking branches of power, the others being the Communist Party of China and the People's Liberation Army.
I mean a 2 second google search could fix that
Do you ever know what youre talking about or do you just spout random crap for the sake of argument?
Just because you want to say it to be inflammatory doesnt make it true
originally posted by: amfirst1
a reply to: JeanPaul
Of course it is, that's the bamboozle. They pretend to paint u a nice socialist society so u can give them control. Then they bait and switch for communism and u can't stop them because u would be disarmed and they have full control. The blueprint was written like this by the think tanks. We already know the game plan and it has slowly came into fruition predicted many decades ago. They will stage crisis after crisis and u will give them more control to resolve something they created.
A Communist NWO is the end game. Socialism and Communism is an oligarchy. One would argue it's socialism for the wealthy. The game plan is to turn the 1% into the middle class and the middle class into the poor class and at the very top is the elites exempt from laws. As seen with the class warfare being pushed. Just watch some of the examples like Divergent movie etc. The writer must be libertarian.
Start another thread on the feasibility of socialism please.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: JeanPaul
Start another thread on the feasibility of socialism please.
Not interested. I agree with what you say in the OP of this one. But my political views are... unusual. You might say I consider myself post-political.
As far as I am concerned, no economic theory works. As for forms of government, they are, as Pope said, fit only to be contested by fools. Democracy is mainly useful as a way of replacing governments without violence, but it has such massive and obvious flaws that keeping it workable has meant endless tinkering and constant expansion of the franchise, to the point where the complexity and weakness of democratic government render it increasingly useless.
originally posted by: amfirst1
a reply to: JeanPaul
Of course it is, that's the bamboozle. They pretend to paint u a nice socialist society so u can give them control. Then they bait and switch for communism and u can't stop them because u would be disarmed and they have full control. The blueprint was written like this by the think tanks. We already know the game plan and it has slowly came into fruition predicted many decades ago. They will stage crisis after crisis and u will give them more control to resolve something they created.
A Communist NWO is the end game. Socialism and Communism is an oligarchy. One would argue it's socialism for the wealthy. The game plan is to turn the 1% into the middle class and the middle class into the poor class and at the very top is the elites exempt from laws. As seen with the class warfare being pushed. Just watch some of the examples like Divergent movie etc. The writer must be libertarian.