It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
Charlie, the thing is;
One, "they" already have us all on a list, Janet Napolitano made sure of that.
Two, if the time ever came when the government wanted to disarm the population, THEY would be in violation of the Constitution that the current (and all former) military swore to defend and protect.
So "they" would be in violation. Now politicians and supporters of gun-grabbers are free to talk about it all day long.
But the second they act, then they will be the criminals.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
You don't get it.
It isn't my firearms I worry about.
My firearms are inanimate objects that represent no intent other than that which I convey with my actions.
My firearms have no feelings nor conscience to fear for their future.
I don't actually care about my firearms at all. I care about my firearms in the same way I care about my table vise, or a hammer.
I care about my liberty. I care about my liberty like I care about my wife and kids. I love liberty deeply and will jealously guard it like I would my wife or kids from those who think they can take them away from me.
My family isn't up for debate anymore than my liberty.
originally posted by: orionthehunter
It's sad that once again a politician and elected official has to use a tragedy to bring up his own political views.
some elected officials do not care about our rights. It's sad that 9 people recently died.
It's also sad that over 10,000 people die in the US every year due to car wrecks but I do not hear anyone talking about banning all cars and trucks to make us safer. Some people do not believe in the bill of rights and want to use every tragedy to promote some agenda of theirs. I think in South Caolina, the focus has shifted on removing the flag flying at the confederate memorial. The fact it's at a confederate memorial is usually left out. It was removed from the state Capitol building and moved to the memorial but apparently the compromise did not satisfy those opposed in other states. Even local politicians where I live have their own agenda to try to change the law.
Apparently you can't even change a statue in SC now without an act of SC congress with a 2/3 majority. Meanwhile our roads are full of potholes and some are expecting us to forget about fixing everything else as if we have nothing better to do, that is elected officials. I personally think the flag debate will lead to nothing changing but I'll let everyone else argue that. I don't care what flag they fly at a confederate memorial and I live in South Carolina.
I'll add that the people here that had relatives die in the civil war, take honoring their dead seriously. If a hate group hijacked the US flag and slightly altered it and another group wanted all US flags banned because they said it was a symbol of hate, I could better understand the debate. I think most people don't care but all those defending gun rights can be happy the agenda has changed focus for the moment. I mean how many people are affected by a flag at a confederate memorial that has been there for almost 2 decades? I'm just glad this nation has no serious issues to discuss anymore. If it was up to me, the flag would have been put in a museum about 20 years ago. I'd be discussing identifying mental health issues and whether or not people saying they are going to shoot up a school etc should be in possession of firearms and weapons. I'd be ok with a 30 or 60 day ban if you made a public statement that you planned on doing a mass shooting against innocent civilians.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: 3danimator2014
I have no desire to shoot anything other than targets in my training courses.
Firearms are tools. They have no intent.
Firearms don't cause mass shootings, people who don't respect life do.
I don't personally care what you think of me as a person. You don't know anything about me outside of my stance on gun control.
The SC shooting had nothing to do with me and I will not be held to account for that or any other shooting I was not involved in.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
and every gun nut who clings on to a passage in the bill of rights that has absolutely ZERO relevence in 2015 are partly responsible and you should feel guilty.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
Isnt it to do with forming militias to protect he land? Something that has no bearing anymore.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
Isnt it to do with forming militias to protect he land? Something that has no bearing anymore.
In so much as the protection was being the first and last line of defence against a tyrannical government.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
Ok, still has no bearing today.
Whats your point? What, you think you guys with your little guns can go against the might of the army, nacy and air force?
Are you SERUIOUSLY expecting to ever form a militis and fight against the govt? Are you insane? or just delusional?