It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: onequestion
I'll wager that 15 years ago, the figures would be identical.
Why is it an issue now?
Because the only jobs left are minimum wage jobs. High paying jobs don't exist anymore. companies are burdened by higher taxes, Obamacare, union demands so they down size or go overseas.
This is the new normal for America. Might as well get used to it.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: beezzer
Can't really disagree there.
Its better late than never.
I was going to antagonize you a little just for fun but i decided against it!
Just being straight up here.
It's easy to blame business and corporations, but think about it.
All businesses and corporations aren't greedy, corrupt bastions of evil.
originally posted by: skunkape23
When cannibalism becomes a necessary survival tactic, I have a hunch which strata of society is going to be first on the grill.
...the social pact that Messrs. Cohen and Greenfield made with their employees at the start of their venture: From top to bottom, the pay ratio between the highest salaried executive and lowest-earning-worker would be no greater than 5 to 1.
To their credit, the ice cream kings kept to their pay scale deal for 16 years. At that point, Cohen was set to retire and no successor who was willing to accept B&J's compensation compact could be found.
So the bar was raised to 7 to 1 to attract new talent, and ultimately to 17 to 1 over the course of a half dozen years more. The company was then acquired by Unilever USA in 2000, after which the corporate cone of silence descended on what was once a very transparent practice.
originally posted by: Boadicea
This was completely voluntary on the part of Ben & Jerry's; and it was eliminated when bought out by a mega-corporation.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Boadicea
This was completely voluntary on the part of Ben & Jerry's; and it was eliminated when bought out by a mega-corporation.
Both of them are worth well over $100 million and collected annual profits while they still owned the company.
This is the same bulls*** line that Warren Buffet plays when he recites that lame trope where he gets paid 'only' a $100,000 a year salary but in reality, which he cleverly omits, makes significantly more on dividends and stock valuations.
originally posted by: Nowornevertill
How does getting used to it fix anything ?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Both of them are worth well over $100 million and collected annual profits while they still owned the company.
This is the same bulls*** line that Warren Buffet plays when he recites that lame trope where he gets paid 'only' a $100,000 a year salary but in reality, which he cleverly omits, makes significantly more on dividends and stock valuations.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: grmorrow
I dont like the things to come for those in power.
Secondly, big corporations are replacing as many expensive workers with machines, computers and robots as they possibly can. As technology continues to advance at a blistering pace, the need for workers (especially low-skilled workers) will continue to decrease.
That isn't a lot of money, but according to the Social Security Administration, 40.28% of all workers make less than $20,000 a year in America today.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: onequestion
This is the new normal for America. Might as well get used to it.