It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: borntowatch
Who are you to decide what is false and and illogical, seriously, who are you but another internet warrior.
A confessed atheist militant, like thats a badge
originally posted by: borntowatch
I dont see the difference between you and the fundamentalists from Wesboro
They would say exactly what you have said only from a Christian fundamental viewpoint, and I would ask them the same question I asked you at the beginning of this post.
Wesboro would say They are correcting your false notion
They would say as you have you dont have the clear evidence, if it was clear it wouldnt be questioned as it is, it wouldnt be as so hotly disputed ot studied.
originally posted by: borntowatch
You exaggerate the science to try and win, why do you have to win? Just let people believe, dont believe if you dont want.
originally posted by: borntowatch
As for anti misinformation, your scientific heroes have done their fair share of mis- information peddling at children and have made many errors that are still in dispute today
originally posted by: borntowatch
Interesting to note that you are asking questions on the mind of God and the only place we find information on the mind of God is the scriptures, but you wont accept scripture?
originally posted by: Ghost147
If someone were to say to you that "the Earth is flat", and decided it was a good idea to push that concept on everyone they can possible converse with, and also teach that notion to their children, and their children's children, then that is reason enough to decide to step in.
If we know for a fact that the Earth is not flat, then why should we respect that the people who do believe it is are pushing this false information on everyone they can get their hands on? If you want to believe that at a personal level, by all means do so. But, when you teach fallacies to everyone else and say "this is the truth!" that is when someone needs to prove you wrong.
You're absolutely correct, religious folks always claim they have the truth. So why not actually go out and find out what is accurate and what isn't? The difference between religion and science is one makes claims and then finds what they consider evidence to back up those claims, and the other finds evidence and then comes to a conclusion as to what that evidence suggests.
Again, Science never claims to be "the truth", it's just our current most accurate tool for studying the universe around us.
originally posted by: borntowatch
You exaggerate the science to try and win, why do you have to win? Just let people believe, dont believe if you dont want.
When have I exaggerated any scientific finding? Could you support your claim, please.
It's not about winning or losing, it's about preventing misinformation from spreading. Again, you can believe all you want to believe, I have no problem with that and I have stated that before (yet you choose to ignore that because you have some sort of bias against me), it is only problematic when those beliefs are forced onto others that we have an issue.
originally posted by: borntowatch
As for anti misinformation, your scientific heroes have done their fair share of mis- information peddling at children and have made many errors that are still in dispute today
Again, it would be nice if you could back up your claims. Once again, science isn't a means to telling the truth to people, it is just a tool that we use to describe natural phenomena at the utmost accuracy we can, presently. No scientist will ever state that "this is absolutely 100% true/fact and will never be disproved", because science doesn't work that way.
In fact, the Scientific Method (the method of which every branch of science uses in order to form their conclusions in the first place) has a requirement in it that states that your conclusion MUST BE FALSIFIABLE. Meaning that it cannot protect itself from all criticism. If a theory or hypothesis is not falsifiable, it is not scientific. Which is why it would be irresponsible to claim something like "All swans are white" because one day we found a swan that wasn't white. The same thing is applied to each and every scientific theory.
Conversely, religion does the opposite. They claim that there is absolutely no way that their religion can be incorrect, and if something were to show that it is incorrect just "have strong faith in your religion" and those things don't matter.
Tell me you see an issue with this frame of mind?
originally posted by: borntowatch
Interesting to note that you are asking questions on the mind of God and the only place we find information on the mind of God is the scriptures, but you wont accept scripture?
When did I say I won't accept scripture? There is a problem with it, however, and that is no one even in the religion can agree that specific parts of scripture are accurate or not.
Again, the question really isn't about god at all, it is about omniscience. We don't need scripture to discus omniscience because omniscience isn't a concept that is solely within scripture.
The topic therefore is about if it is logical to state that "Omniscience and Free will are capable of coexisting", rather than "Is god omniscience? and, does this effect free will?"
This question was never written to be answered, its just to cause contention and animosity, well done
originally posted by: borntowatch
If someone wants to believe the earth is flat and wants to teach that to their children its their right.
You are not the law, someone will teach the earth is round and the individual makes the choice
You infer you are the be all and end all of all wisdom
originally posted by: borntowatch
You sound like a dictator, you must have it your way.
People are allowed to be wrong, you are not God, You do not have the truth though you claim to (just as you say all religious folk claim).
originally posted by: borntowatch
Your argument is a strawman
Comparing a testable round earth to untestable theory is silly
originally posted by: borntowatch
Now I think your scientific method is akin to the belief in the flat earth, listening to you espouse that is as ridiculous as listening to an individual espouse a flat earth.
originally posted by: borntowatch
I wont fight you over your ignorances as I see them, but I will contest your arrogance to attack others for their beliefs right or wrong.
originally posted by: borntowatch
The thing is Ghost, you dont have all the answers yet act as if you do, you pretend or even possibly believe you do, that is scary.
originally posted by: borntowatch
As a christian I dont have all the answers, though I have enough information to be content. I think because I am content that burns you up inside.
Why
I dontknow.
originally posted by: borntowatch
All I see is you kicking and screaming at anyone who doesnt believe what you want to make them believe.