posted on Jun, 2 2015 @ 11:27 PM
Also zenos paradox is solved by considering an ultimate reference frame, which in all likely hood is the purest nothingness, but that distance is real
between all non nothing, and so if a particle is completely stationary in relation to the real dimension of absolute nothing, another particle, can
approach it, in relation to the absolute nothing, and in relation to that exact particle (this is what Space time attempted to be all about, the
concept of space time, and then the concept of reference frames as existing on the particle, and comparing this relative reference frames while
considering other particles reference frames, acknowledging that one can never know the values of the pure nothingness reference frame, but that it
must exist abstractly, if something is to exist, and be compared against one another while using a common language, such as distance, and movement
amongst distance, which in essence is space and time.) And woah.... I dont think zenos paradox is solved in my mind. I am trying to think just with
marbles, or a hypothetical flat surface, two sheets of paper separated in space, to attempt to make it as pure as a thought as possible, two highlight
the fact that only one point of surface will touch at all, and its precisely via its movement; if one of the pieces of paper is existing stationary in
reference to an ultimate 'nothing dimension' which doesnt exist, but which all 'something' exists in, and the very nature of movement, means some
aspect of something that is something, altering its position in relation to the ultimate nothing space, and also yes by proxy in relation to all other
somethings, which are relatively moving in relation to all other somethings and the ultimate nothing space. If the universe is fact, then, there are
some differences, but still for the effect whether illusionary or real, something must be moved for something to be moved.
immediately I think to say the trick might begin to be solved by attempting to quantify the space the stationary, or moving, paper 1 is located. You
will need to use some greater than 0 value to do this, well, even if you mark it as 0, the very notion of marking a something in existence in area
relation to potentially all other things, is marking a destination that exists, therefore in theory it must be possible to get to that destination, if
it is a non nothing, in theory, ignoring any conceivable physical laws of energy and repulsion, but an abstract ideal object with no quality, just a
perfect marble substance, made of pure stuffness, (I say ideal, in a sense of impossible, when considering our understanding of physical reality, and
it is almost false to consider the term in a good way in these regards, because reactive substance with energy barriers and qualities and repulsion
potential, is 'cooler' more interesting and greater conceivable potential, then these 'ideal' unreactive marbles, I am drawing mind to)
Then it is possible that we could imagine an identical marble or piece of paper, 'born', imagined into existence, exactly touching! the other objects,
two perfect marbles exactly touching, two sheets of paper exactly touching.
And do the thought experiment backwards; imagine moving one half the distance away from the other? Is that possible? What sort of number would you
base that off of?
Now there is a sense in which zeno might be right.
Imagine all particles in the universe are traveling at a constant speed; or first let me say, imagine all particles in particular groups of the
universe are traveling a constant speed.
So any movement in relation to others, in a particular group, is always a sort of lateral movement;
So all objects are traveling at the same velocity and momentum, Or ...
It might be that no object in the universe can really touch, but this goes back to depending on the true nature of 'particles' the most fundamental
ones, how they actually exist as entirely dramatic individual particulates of substance, how they are perfectly their own speck, and can they melt
into others, do they the exact they? Transform like liquid into others? With others, does this require two distinct areas of substance touching?
Eventually, even with energy fields and repulsion, there is always somethingness touching somethingness to cause something to move, and all things
appear to be quite moving anyway, but this is once that is considered, the beggining of new movement in relation.
A rock falls differently in relation to the surface of the earth, when it is falling off a sky scraper, as opposed to a 45 degree angle hill.
It does so only because of what it is touching; in the sky scraper example it is touching no 45 degree angle hill; in the hill example it is;
Something must be touching something, to explain this difference.
So in this sense, even if there is reaction, repulsion, all object is ideal in the sense of reactions are caused by non nothing touching non nothing.
No spooky action at distances.
Oh... and then I think this is solved easily, by considering that decimal places probably dont exist in reality... lol. Maybe.
There is finite space between two objects.
Which is a weird concept,
But imagine building any number line, would have to be built out of something, ultimately;
And so to build something, something has to be a finite size,
So to build the number line, you have to use non nothing of some definite size;
To start with absolutely nothing, and then to build the number line, the first 'non nothing' you contribute, will have to at least be 'the smallest
possible non nothing'.
So with that considered, every non nothing that you measure movements in relation to one another, will be in relation to that eternal constant of 'the
smallest possible non nothing'; which is relative to the ultimate brand of something, but also relative to somethings that could be conceivable beyond
it but never possible, but are still closer to ultimate '0'; which is ultimate nothing, that all possible somethings would be compared to.