It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Anaana
originally posted by: anotherdaytoday
Eh? But then I'd rather have some wings to fly, instead of a second pair of hands.
Now we're talking
Four hands would just mean I could work harder, I work hard enough already.
I wanna fly!
why not four arms AND a pair of wings!
originally posted by: rossacus
I've seen it all now. Isn't 6 arms better than 4, if we had 4 it would prove that intelligent design didn't exist because 6 is better than 4.
OMG...I've just realised....8 is better than 6....there goes my theory
"Poe's Law" was originally written by Nathan Poe in 2005, in a post on christianforums.com, an internet forum about Christianity. The post was written in the context of a debate about creationism, where a previous poster had remarked "Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious". Poe then replied, "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is uttrerly [sic] impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.". The original statement of Poe's Law referred specifically to creationism, but it has since been generalized to apply to any kind of fundamentalism or extremism.