It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not so long ago, federal prosecutors were simply terrified by the idea of what might happen if they ever brought criminal charges against a major bank. They worried that the consequences of a felony conviction might cause a large financial institution to collapse and wreak havoc on Wall Street, much as the accounting firm Arthur Andersen went bust after it was convicted for its role in the Enron scandal.
So the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission landed on a compromise. When bankers got caught doing something illegal, the government asked them to pay a hefty fine and sign a "deferred prosecution agreement," in which they promised to mend their behavior forever more. The government lawyers got to trumpet billion-dollar penalties. The banks got to go back to their businesses without much long-term damage. For everyone else, it was pretty clear Wall Street had simply gotten "too big to jail."
originally posted by: Greathouse
I'll tell you what bothers me. Normally we are held in such contempt that they don't even offer up a scapegoat.
Banks Are Now Pleading Guilty to Crimes. So Why Aren’t They Being Punished Like Criminals?
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: Swills
Take 100 Billion, get fined 10 Billion.
I will take that deal!
originally posted by: Greathouse
I'll tell you what bothers me. Normally we are held in such contempt that they don't even offer up a scapegoat.