It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Wheelindiehl
Considering that there is an abnormally large amount of ice in that area ... is it really a surprise that some of the ice is breaking off? Also, they are at the end of their melt season heading into their winter.
Oh my God quick tell the scientists working down there they obviously have no idea.
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
originally posted by: ketsuko
Americans, more than the citizens of ANY other nation, are more likely to think (a) climate change isn't real (b) Dinosaurs lived with men (c) The Earth was created in seven days (actually it was six, according to The Bible)
Americans are LEAST likely to believe in Evolution, the Big Bang Theory, Climate Change, and many other issues which the rest of the World accept because they follow the SCIENCE, rather than listen to rhetoric from the likes of Fox News.
Gee, when you use terminology like that, I can almost hear the congregation in the background behind you shouting, "Can I get an AMEN!"
"AMEN, brother!"
"AMEN! AMEN!"
How can anyone fail to be converted with that kind of impassioned preaching?
Well it seems very true to me as an outside observer from the UK. Whenever I have visited the US I never see, hear or read anything to convince me that that opinion is wrong. The religious right over there Jesus H
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: johnwick
There's a very clear difference of tone between your posts and mine.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: johnwick
Oh my God your hyperbole is ridiculous. In one thread according you I attacked Jews. Now I'm attacking you for being male? Your harshness doesn't affect me. Me calling you on your BS is not because you've offended me, it's because you're just simply, wrong.
Have you seen Venus lately?
Why am I wrong there is no evidence co2 can even cause "out of control warming"?
Because the models are based on physics.
Why am I wrong AGW is bs based on models designed to prove it is true not find the truth?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: johnwick
Any chance you could put two thoughts together? One sentence paragraphs are not only poor writing, they are distracting.
Have you seen Venus lately?
Why am I wrong there is no evidence co2 can even cause "out of control warming"?
Because the models are based on physics.
Why am I wrong AGW is bs based on models designed to prove it is true not find the truth?
You asked if CO2 can cause "out of control warming." It can, as demonstrated on Venus. You said nothing about Earth. I've already addressed "out of control warming" on Earth.
The earth and Venus are not even compatible.
and yet the consensus (by a fricking huge margin) is that man is responsible.
Dr jasper kirkby of CERN suggests that there is a strong possibility that variabilities in solar output might be causing the changes in world temperatures.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: johnwick
I was referring to your wrongness about me and your use of hyperbole to attack people that you disagree with. You want it kept simple and direct? Try it yourself.
Never once in Terra's( that is earth's name BTW) history has co2 at much higher concentrations than now wrecked the ecosystem.
originally posted by: johnwick
Terra's( that is earth's name BTW)
So...we can hope that Yosemite erupts and continue to dump CO2 into the atmosphere? What about oceanic acidification? Doesn't matter?
1. A large volcano eruption or two can reset it all.
Please provide a source for this datum. The south pole is pretty distant from the Antarctic coast.
2. Large amount of ice build up on the south pole is not a good sign.
Indeed. Unpleasant consequences.
3. Large ice shelves breaking off will cause havoc to shipping lanes and will raise the oceans some, not to mention what it may do to the currents.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: glend
Dr jasper kirkby of CERN suggests that there is a strong possibility that variabilities in solar output might be causing the changes in world temperatures.
The possible relationship between cosmic rays and climate is interesting and a topic of quite a bit of speculation in regard to climate. But you know that cosmic radiation levels have not changed much, right? You also know that the theory says that lower solar activity leads to increased cosmic radiation which leads to more low level cloudiness which leads to decreased radiative forcing, right?
Didn't you say that solar activity is decreasing? Doesn't that mean that there is more cosmic radiation? Doesn't that mean there should be more low level clouds? Doesn't that mean that the planet should be cooling rather than warming?