It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
originally posted by: TheWhisper
[
"If actually you read my posts carefully you will see that I have said quite clearly that classifying the petrified wood as a moon rock was a simple mistake. "
On what is your conclusion based? The BBC website reports.
"US officials said they had no explanation for the Dutch discovery."
news.bbc.co.uk...
Every article newspaper report and book I have seen leads me to that conclusion. It's the only honest one to make.
originally posted by: TheWhisper
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
"US officials said they had no explanation for the Dutch discovery."
they have no explaination because it has nothing to do with them.. it was a personal gift from Middendorf to Drees..
and why does the placard not even have the recipients name??
"why does the placard not even have the recipients name??"
Mr Drees is one of the most important post WWII PM of the Netherlands. Are you questioning the integrity of Mr Drees with that question?
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: TheWhisper
The sources have been linked to in the previous thread many times, and can be found on the web with a few simple search terms.
Do your own work.
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
"US officials said they had no explanation for the Dutch discovery."
they have no explaination because it has nothing to do with them.. it was a personal gift from Middendorf to Drees..
and why does the placard not even have the recipients name??
"why does the placard not even have the recipients name??"
Mr Drees is one of the most important post WWII PM of the Netherlands. Are you questioning the integrity of Mr Drees with that question?
read what im writing properly..
the placard was given to Drees, by Middendorf!! its a gift FROM Middendorf TO Drees..
so, im wondering what mr middendorf's intentions were.. it was his gift to drees.. drees was old, bad of hearing and seeing..
drees is a former PM he has been out of office for 11 years, why would NASA give him a lunar sample and not give one to the current PM or the Queen (the actual head of state)??
originally posted by: TheWhisper
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
"US officials said they had no explanation for the Dutch discovery."
they have no explaination because it has nothing to do with them.. it was a personal gift from Middendorf to Drees..
and why does the placard not even have the recipients name??
"why does the placard not even have the recipients name??"
Mr Drees is one of the most important post WWII PM of the Netherlands. Are you questioning the integrity of Mr Drees with that question?
read what im writing properly..
the placard was given to Drees, by Middendorf!! its a gift FROM Middendorf TO Drees..
so, im wondering what mr middendorf's intentions were.. it was his gift to drees.. drees was old, bad of hearing and seeing..
drees is a former PM he has been out of office for 11 years, why would NASA give him a lunar sample and not give one to the current PM or the Queen (the actual head of state)??
"Queen Juliana wanted to call US president Nixon a murderer when he visited the royal palace of Soestdijk."
A questionable issue is that such a rare and important item surfaced during an "art exhibition" held in 2006 by Rotterdam artists Liesbeth Bik and Jos van der Pol and not during a science oriented event. The exhibition was rather tongue in cheek, since it asked what they thought of the museum's plans to open an exhibition center on the moon.
Bik Van der Pol took as core item of the project one of the oldest objects in the collection of the Rijksmuseum: a moon rock. The crew of the first manned lunar landing mission, Apollo 11, brought this rock back to earth in 1969. That same year the three astronauts Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin and Michael Collins visited the Netherlands. Willem Drees, a former Dutch prime minister, received the rock on that occasion as a present from the United States ambassador. And later, this piece of stone was donated to the Rijksmuseum.
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: TheWhisper
"US officials said they had no explanation for the Dutch discovery."
they have no explaination because it has nothing to do with them.. it was a personal gift from Middendorf to Drees..
and why does the placard not even have the recipients name??
"why does the placard not even have the recipients name??"
Mr Drees is one of the most important post WWII PM of the Netherlands. Are you questioning the integrity of Mr Drees with that question?
read what im writing properly..
the placard was given to Drees, by Middendorf!! its a gift FROM Middendorf TO Drees..
so, im wondering what mr middendorf's intentions were.. it was his gift to drees.. drees was old, bad of hearing and seeing..
drees is a former PM he has been out of office for 11 years, why would NASA give him a lunar sample and not give one to the current PM or the Queen (the actual head of state)??
"Queen Juliana wanted to call US president Nixon a murderer when he visited the royal palace of Soestdijk."
i dont see why that is important or even why its relevant.. she was the head of state.. she would be alot more important than Drees.. the lunar rocks were NOT personal gift, therefore the gift should be received by the head of state.. not some Former PM.. heck even the current PM should receive a gift to the country before a former PM..
originally posted by: TheWhisper
Well maybe she didn't want to accept the rock as she didn't want anything to do with the Nixon administration. When you read the article in dutch it will become clear that she didn't even want Nixon to come to the Netherlands.
Replacing a moon rock with a piece of petrified wood and how This changed Our perception of the world
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: onebigmonkey
OBM doesn't believe in apollo conspiracies. But the Dutch Moon Rock tale he tells sounds a lot like a conspiracy. How anyone can be so sure of its origin is baffling. The story around it has probably changed more than the argument for passing thru the VABs!
originally posted by: TheWhisper
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: onebigmonkey
OBM doesn't believe in apollo conspiracies. But the Dutch Moon Rock tale he tells sounds a lot like a conspiracy. How anyone can be so sure of its origin is baffling. The story around it has probably changed more than the argument for passing thru the VABs!
Breaking news will soon be released about the Dutch moon rock and the Apollo 11 astronauts during the goodwill tour in the Netherlands. The story is not adding up anymore NASA has something to explain. TW has the images that will show that the three Apollo 11 astronauts handed a moon rock not the ambassador.
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
An excellent analysis:
Warning: contains image of Nixon.