It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This may look as a quite unusual situation: why would the world’s richest
and most powerful country not have a large dedicated antiproton source? Part of
the answer to this is already contained in a twenty-years old report of the RAND
corporation which basically concluded that as long as US scientists would have
full access to antimatter produced at CERN “a production/accumulation facility,
such as the one at CERN, although desirable, wouldn’t in the near future have to
be built in the United States” [33, p. 43]. In this spirit, one could also add that
it could certainly be in the interest of the United States to let Europe have a few
unique advanced and costly facilities in order to motivate its researchers, and to
attract those from Eastern Europe and Russia.
However, the main reason is more probably that the production of antiprotons
is not the most difficult technological problem in the way of practical applications
of antimatter. In fact, the 1014 antiprotons per year to be produced in 2010 at the
AD facility at CERN, or at FAIR at GSI, correspond already to about 1 nanogram
per year. If presently available technology would be used to build a fully dedicated
“antimatter factory,” rather than a general purpose “research facility,” one could
easily produce more that 1 microgram of antimatter per year right now [27]. As
1 microgram is sufficient to trigger one thermonuclear weapon, such a facility will
only be a factor 365 away from the implicit goal that the US and Soviet governments
set forth in the 1940s, namely to produce enough material for making one atomic
bomb every day!
As a matter of fact, the United States and other countries are still investigating
the best technique for producing very large quantities of antimatter. One such
technique is based on the idea of creating a “quark-gluon plasma,” which is studied
in laboratories such as CERN, RHIC at BNL (the Brookhaven National Laboratory
near New York), and FAIR at GSI. Creating such a plasma is essentially trying to
reproduce in the laboratory what happened at the beginning of the universe, a tiny
fraction of a second after the big bang. At that moment there were equal amounts
of matter and antimatter in the universe, all matter and energy being in a so-called
“primordial plasma” state. If the cooling-down process of the primordial plasma
into either matter or antimatter could be controlled, one would possibly have the
most efficient method for producing antimatter on a large scale! There is therefore
no surprise that weapons-laboratory scientists are in fact much interested by this
supposedly purely “astrophysical” state of matter [35], especially since the idea
itself originated from Edward Teller and collaborators in 1973 already [36] (see
also [37]).
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: sy.gunson
Interesting.. I'm going to read the report, but I would like to now how did you come about it? What was your initial source?
originally posted by: sy.gunson
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: sy.gunson
Interesting.. I'm going to read the report, but I would like to now how did you come about it? What was your initial source?
I was trying to understand the nuclear physics behind Nazi efforts in 1942 to develop LiDT boosted fission nuclear weapons in World War 2 and was searching the term Inertial Confinement. At first I was just reading Gsponer's paper for clues to Nazi research, but noticed that there was just as interesting story from this report itself.
Gsponer mentions that first they were trying to develop synthetic heavy elements for nuclear weapons of increased yield but then they developed an approach to using anti-matter weapons.
Anti-matter permits miniature nuclear weapons of low yield with no fall out but terrible lethality, like mini-neutron bombs.
originally posted by: WP4YT
a reply to: doompornjunkie
The US has several colliders, but the LHC is the largest in the world.
originally posted by: pirhanna
So its talking about using antimatter as the detonator for very small yield nuclear weapons.
In not seeing the evidence for cern being used for this. And im failing to understand the motive, not that the military really needs one, but as far as making any difference in a war, this wouldnt give any serious advantage over more conventional weaponry or the various truly advanced weapon systems in development or use. I dont see an application that isnt already covered much cheaper.
Antimatter weapons by Andre Gsponer and Jean-Pierre Hurni
At CERN (the European Laboratory for Particle Physics), on the evening of the 17 to the 18 of July 1986, antimatter was captured in an electromagnetic trap for the first time in history. Due to the relatively precarious conditions of this first successful attempt, it was only possible to conserve the antiprotons for about ten minutes. This was, nevertheless, much longer than the Americans Bill Kells of Fermilab and Gerald Gabrielse of the University of Washington had hoped for. When these researchers return to CERN for another attempt, an improved apparatus will permit them to literally 'bottle' several tens or hundreds of antiprotons. Ultimately, the perfection of this technique will allow them to carry home a substance infinitely more rare and difficult to obtain than a piece of the Moon.
They would thus be able to complete, in their own laboratory, a most important experiment for the theory of the unification of the fundamental physical forces, that of comparing, with a precision greater than one part per billion, the masses of the proton and anti-proton. Some other American Scientists, this time coming from the Los Alamos military laboratory (where the atomic bomb was perfected during the Second World War), are also at work in Geneva. In a few months time, using many more resources and more sophisticated equipment, they also expect to capture and bottle antiprotons, but in much greater quantities. They will, as the group from the University of Washington, strive to divulge the difference in mass between the proton and its antiparticle. But, they will also attempt a number of complex manipulations such as, the production of antihydrogen, the injection of antiprotons into superfluid helium, the search for metastable states in ordinary matter, etc. Various crucial experiments that should, in the near future, help to determine whether or not antimatter could become a new source of nuclear energy for civilian and military applications.
For the more delicate experiments, they could certainly bring their vintage 1987 or 1988 bottles of antimatter to Los Alamos. There, up in the peaceful mountains of New Mexico, they could perfect nuclear weapons free of radioactive fall-out, beam weapons projecting thermonuclear plasma jets, gamma- or X-ray lasers, or other still more secret weapons, all triggered by antimatter.
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
originally posted by: sy.gunson
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: sy.gunson
Interesting.. I'm going to read the report, but I would like to now how did you come about it? What was your initial source?
I was trying to understand the nuclear physics behind Nazi efforts in 1942 to develop LiDT boosted fission nuclear weapons in World War 2 and was searching the term Inertial Confinement. At first I was just reading Gsponer's paper for clues to Nazi research, but noticed that there was just as interesting story from this report itself.
...
Ha I just found a new hobby. It would be cool if you shared more of your research here.
A man named Dirk Finkemeier from Espelkamp uncovered evidence from the Library of congress that the uranium bomb dropped on Hiroshima was actually manufactured in Germany and captured by US forces near Goslar in April '45.
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: sy.gunson
A man named Dirk Finkemeier from Espelkamp uncovered evidence from the Library of congress that the uranium bomb dropped on Hiroshima was actually manufactured in Germany and captured by US forces near Goslar in April '45.
Are you implying that although we were experimenting with nukes at that time, that the Germans already had them? Not unbelievable by any means.. just look at the minds behind the Manhattan project.
Like i said. found a new hobby!
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
a reply to: sy.gunson
I strongly suspect those people behind this story have just watched a movie called "Angels & Demons". Because that storyline matches almost exactly just switch "illuminati" for "US military" and there we have it !!
From your source:
originally posted by: sy.gunson
The real purpose behind CERN is the harvesting of anti-protons for development of fourth generation nuclear weapons at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory at Los Alamos.
...
Andre Gsponer's Report
So your own source says there are engineering problems to be solved before antimatter can be used in practical applications.
The problems are that antimatter is expensive to produce in large quantities at present, and that numerous engineering
problems have still to be solved before it can be used in practical applications.
in 1999, NASA gave a figure of $62.5 trillion per gram of antihydrogen
The Tevatron was on the threshold of discovering the Higgs. The energy level just wasn't quite high enough. But it was high enough to produce positrons and antiprotons. Although maybe not in to quantities the LHC could theoretically yield.
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
originally posted by: WP4YT
a reply to: doompornjunkie
The US has several colliders, but the LHC is the largest in the world.
You are right.. I should have been more specific.
I meant serious colliders. If i'm not mistaken the US has very small ones compared to CERN.
Can't reach anywhere near their energy levels... it's like bringing a go-cart to the Indy 500