It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: glend
a reply to: Answer
lol, it proves everything, that its escort fleet was unable to detect must less defend an aircraft carrier from a submarine attack.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: Zaphod58
No it doesn't.
But it does prove that such things can happen, no matter what technology is applied.
You, of all people on here, should know that, but if you'd rather be sarcastic about it, thats your problem.
As a soldier or sailor we have very little to do with where we go! You make the same mistake as many do. The military only carries out the will of the politician who start the damn wars. Don't blame the troops for the misadventures of the politicians.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: buddah6
Or just stop interveneing in countrys we shouldn't be in the first place?
If your getting mass protests and resistance at home shouldn't that tell you something ? IE you shouldn't be there?
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: buddah6
From the responses that I have read most of you have no idea how a war would be conducted. It is not ship v ship. We layer our warfighting with ships, aircraft and space based assets. So educate yourselves before making statement to the strengths of our military. It's not like playing Battleship with your bud down the street.
The only way we will lose it will be the same things we experienced fighting war since the 1950's. Groups of anarchists, student activists, yellow press and politicians seeking office by throwing our military under the f'king buss by micromanaging every move HERE AT HOME! If we were beaten it was done by ourselves not Iraq, Russia, China, Viet Nam or North Korea.
Couldn't agree more.
I think in war all strategy shod come only from commanders.
Never let politicians decide strategy, it gets our guys killed for their political ends.
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
The west needs to increases it defence budget three fold.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: mazzroth
Too bad the new jammer is a self defense system, completely incapable of crippling any ship, of any type.
originally posted by: roadgravel
Enjoy the military empire while it's still working. Sooner of later, just like all others, it will fall.
Using defense is one thing, offense is another. Soon our enemies will greatly outnumber our friends.
originally posted by: mazzroth
originally posted by: LOSTinAMERICA
If the United States is so weak, why doesn't anyone attack instead of talk? It's because we would destroy them if they did.
Like the 22 Terrorist's back in 2001 ? from then to now the US has become a Rabid Psychotic Serial Killer who has been hell bent on invading more Countries than it usually did. I bet the Romans thought back in the day they were invincible as well.
If WW3 started I would be more worried of the Americans than any other nation, no other Country has used Nuclear weapons on civilians and the USA see's everyone and everything as a hostile enemy.
originally posted by: Ex_MislTech
a reply to: mazzroth
Don't forget the nuclear stealth cruise missile the KH-102 and
its offshoots since its creation.
KH-102 - nuclear stealth cruise missile
The KH-55 series has also been given to Iran and China, and could be modded to be much
like the KH-102.
KH-55 - nuclear cruise missile
While we decommission Cheyenne Mountain, work continued at Yamantau even
during the collapse of the Russian economy.
Yamantau - dead hand of Russian nuclear forces
Yamantau - additional info
originally posted by: buddah6
As a soldier or sailor we have very little to do with where we go! You make the same mistake as many do. The military only carries out the will of the politician who start the damn wars. Don't blame the troops for the misadventures of the politicians.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: buddah6
Or just stop interveneing in countrys we shouldn't be in the first place?
If your getting mass protests and resistance at home shouldn't that tell you something ? IE you shouldn't be there?
When I returned from RVN ,the first time, there were protesters laying in wait for any soldier leaving the airport. Needless to say it was ugly! The protests should have been in Washington but they might be arrested so let's attack the soldiers returning home. They/we were easy targets.
We have an element in our country who will protest anything. Case in point, Ferguson, Missouri riots where factions from every left wing group came for nothing more than causing anarchy. The same happens here with every war. The vast majority of the protesters, in my time, were young men afraid of being drafted into military service and communist groups like SDS who were the ones who would throw feces, urine and bottles of red paint at the GIs. These factions will protest saving baby bunnies.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: nwtrucker
I case you hadn't heard. Russia has decreased it's order of PAK-FAs to....12 units..TWELVE.
Which just shows that Russia would look to nukes faster, as they aren't able to win a conventional war.