It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Our population needs to be knocked down to about 2 million of us all of a sudden.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Whats the sense of killing billions of people to control the population? THe onyl reason for population control is to prevent the disasters that are feared to come from it, and the only reason to stop those disasters is to prevent people from dying. So where's the sense in killing everyone? Kill everyone to prevent deaths from disaster?
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
I for one would be totally willing to sacrifice myself to help stem the DESTRUCTION OF OUR PLANET!
And I would hope that G. W. was one of the survivors
Who's with me?
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
Who said anything about killing anyone?
You sick...
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Im for a bottleneck if I can be one of the 2 million JK
Im not for that in anyway I think its about time for humans to expand into space. Wiping out most humans when the population gets high is no way to evolve as a species. It would set back technology so bad having only a million people because of the disaster it would take to kill almost 6 billion people. Nuclear war, a plague or a asteroid strike are the only things I can think of that would do that. It might buy us a few thousand years and we would be back were we started.
Making a Bottleneck would be taking two steps backwards for humanity.
Originally posted by cotwom
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
I for one would be totally willing to sacrifice myself to help stem the DESTRUCTION OF OUR PLANET!
And I would hope that G. W. was one of the survivors
Who's with me?
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
Who said anything about killing anyone?
You sick...
Ummm....
Originally posted by Delta Chaos
do you think we could pull our heads out soon enough to avert the catastrophe that awaits in a couple hundred years? Hmmm... I think only a catastrophe could cause that to happen. How ironic.
Nuclear war would be a bad way for it to happen. We'd be screwed. But how about a pandemic that only a slight amount of the population was completely immune to? With two million people, we'd probably have plenty of people who were sufficiently talented to fill all the roles of a functional society. And we could keep ourselves busy by cleaning up our mess. We could learn to use existing technology to do this. And at the same time, learn not to make the mess in the first place.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Whats the sense of killing billions of people to control the population? THe onyl reason for population control is to prevent the disasters that are feared to come from it, and the only reason to stop those disasters is to prevent people from dying. So where's the sense in killing everyone? Kill everyone to prevent deaths from disaster?
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If you used neutron bombs a nuclear war wouldnt be that bad for the earth as most people might think.
I agree you would have to chose plenty of people who were sufficiently talented to fill all the roles of a functional society. But who would decide which people are valuable to a future society and which are not.
I dont think any human or group has the right to make that choice.
Originally posted by Telly
I know most everyone here has already heard this but it makes my point that a reduction of the world population is inevitable. no one needs to do anything to help it happen.
Originally read by Hugo Weaving as Agent Smith (Long Live Priscilla!)
I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area, and you multiply, and multiply, until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet, you are a plague, and we are the cure.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If you used neutron bombs a nuclear war wouldnt be that bad for the earth as most people might think.
Originally posted by cotwom
Chances are we'd be unable to try making that choice and all the people we would have wanted to survive would be dead... (and with my luck) all the women. At which point if I was a survivor, I'd kill myself.
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
My problem with it is that it would kill innocent flowers and puppies, too. We need to keep all the puppies.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Well if your really want to save the puppies I would suggest a bio weapon that just kills humans which could be made perhaps a weaponized version of smallpox. But they could be very hard to control it even if you had a cure for the 2 million people it could mutate and your cure might not work anymore.