Why are Hitler and Obama taking all the criticism?

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: liteonit6969

The common thread is that both Hitler and Obama championed the atrocities they inflicted on their citizens. Obama knew damn well that the 'health care' reform he was championing was crap and still went ahead and put his stamp and approval on the affordable care act. Without Obama this travesty could never have been perpetrated on the American people.

Pretty sure that it was the Insurence companies or a couple of them that changed and reformed their names to adapt to a new system that would give them more profits.

Like Enron, Only Obama would get a cut of the profits. If it wasn't him doing it, The next president would do it from third party donations forcing unanymous decisions.

Just my take on it, These people are paid to be there and not paid by the public. Well not Until they reach office.

I don't think blaming the president is ever really the Issue, Every preisdent has always had a crosshair on them.
Even from the very first president. Who was assassinated.
It's all right there in your history books.

a reply to: superman2012

Too bad we can't make the connection to Harper!

What are ya talkin ??

Harper and Hitler both start with "H" !

Obviously there must be a connection...

a reply to: MALBOSIA

Sorry i used the word monster and not the millions of other bad things hitler did or was, did you have a point or just passing by.

originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: superman2012

Too bad we can't make the connection to Harper!

What are ya talkin ??

Harper and Hitler both start with "H" !

Obviously there must be a connection...

I was going to say that neither would take advice or criticism or advice from their opposition or countrymen. But H works too.

Yeah the conservatives are pretty disgusting, But so are the Liberals.
I hate Lobbyists.

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
a reply to: MALBOSIA

Sorry i used the word monster and not the millions of other bad things hitler did or was, did you have a point or just passing by.

You were differentiating the two with only one being a bankers best friend. I don't care what you call Hilter but don't try and tell people he was not a bankers best friend.

They should just wear a vest with all their sponsor patches sown on like a race car driver.

a reply to: MALBOSIA

Again plz point out where i said that hitler was not a bankster friend.

Ill wait hehe

Shoo fly

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

They are the same in those two respects.

Hitler and Obama in the same thread???

Carry on.

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
a reply to: MALBOSIA

Again plz point out where i said that hitler was not a bankster friend.

Ill wait hehe

Shoo fly

This "fly" quoted your post where you said quite clearly that Hitler and Obama were not the same because Obama is a bankers best friend and Hitler is ____. That is differentiating in case you are unaware. Otherwise you would have said BOTH Obama and Hitler are a bankers best friend.

You like losing to flies?

a reply to: MALBOSIA

I never understood the need of pulling words from thin air, i said that obamas biggest crime was selling out to the bankers.

Thats all, keep up the good work do

I wish that the survivors of nazy germany met some of you guys, id love to see there reaction.

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
I wish that the survivors of nazy germany met some of you guys, id love to see there reaction.

i agree completely.
2nd.
tetra

Funny thing about Hitler is that over the years so many people have come out with what is now a urban expression a baldy," Hitler was right" WTF is that supposed to mean? racial perfection, socialism, nationalism or just destroying the world end of..all of those ideas are nominees, all of those ideas still exist..funny that! Funny as in funny peculiar.

Hitler is the ultimate fall guy because his side lost. Also he was pretty ill and losing his mind there at the end of the war, so it's easy to pick on the fellow. There were MANY OTHER men in his administration that were FAR worse than the Fuhrer himself. (I'm a historian, not a Hitler-lover, just clarifying.). He was put up as a figurehead because people respected him, because he was charismatic, patriotic, an excellent orator, etc. He had a lot of good qualities.

He was also racist as hell and wanted to rule Europe.

Obama... not great with the speeches, not much of a patriot, but doesn't endorse the mass slaughter of minorities.

They don't really have much in common, Hitler is just the most recent complete madman that's blatantly tried to take over the world. This means he is still considered "Bad Guy #1" and that's why we compare people to him.

If Ghengis Khan had been campaigning in the 1940s we'd be calling people Grammar-Mongols. (I just made that up. I slay myself.)

Stalin... I think Stalin is more of a disgusting stain because he did the things he did to his own people, not even an enemy or perceived enemy.

Also the key to being labeled as REALLY EVIL in history is to kill people who are the same color as you. Tip to budding future evil overlords. (If they're less developed than you it's just "expansion".)

a reply to: FireflyStars

Some consider they have an immunity (because of Hitler), and are p***d because of the neutrality Obama dares to oppose them ATM ...
Another interesting post on a (somehow) similar subject is :
Why is Charlie Hebdo OK, but not Dieudonné ?

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

I DID he was my father's friend LIKE me he thinks the communist infitrator was bankrolled to enact "Cloward and Piven" on America,he stated "Hitler never lied when Prescott bank rolled him,but Soro's boy is an abomination to his own country"and sated "He should be shot."
At which point I stated we didn't need a martyr he said "who gives a F##k about some damn red."

originally posted by: liteonit6969
Do you feel that the blame Obama and Hitler have taken is proportional to how much of an influence they had on the outcomes. Would these things not have happened with or without them? I feel that It didn't matter who was put on that platform, the agenda was set and they (I admit willingly) toed the line.

I don't think you are well versed in the Rise of Hitler to power in Germany. It is well documented that his views on the problems that Germany faced not only caused the War but also the Holocaust. There was no corporation pushing Hitler to direct so much animosity against Jewish people. Once he held the powers of state he formed government policy, spent money and corporations fulfilled contracts but it was not the other way around.

You should really read much more about Hitler before discussing him. It's a sensitive subject and to try to shift blame off of him and onto 'corporations' really isn't appropriate.

originally posted by: noeltrotsky
You should really read much more about Hitler before discussing him. It's a sensitive subject and to try to shift blame off of him and onto 'corporations' really isn't appropriate.

And yet it is so terribly, terribly revealing.