It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You probably forgot,
ISS Expedition Duration 1
September 2014 - September 2015
Expeditions Assigned
41/42,43/44
The consensus would seem to be "can". With one in protest.
..and I was able to pull that series of images at eol.jsc.nasa.gov...
originally posted by: GaryN
a reply to: Phage
The consensus would seem to be "can". With one in protest.
If we are going to do science by consensus, then for seeing stars from the Moon it's Cernan vs the other 11. Maybe he just had superior eyes, he said he saw stars even when not in the LM shadow. Didn't see him mention any planets though.
@wildespace
..and I was able to pull that series of images at eol.jsc.nasa.gov...
You conveniently forgot the squished one
eol.jsc.nasa.gov...
and the the blue one
eol.jsc.nasa.gov...
and the one where it begins to dim
eol.jsc.nasa.gov...
Do you understand what the progression is showing? Cherry picking at its finest there fella'.
originally posted by: wildespace
Theres a discussion on this topic here. Cernan seems to have had more bright stars above him than, say, Armstrong, so it's possible that he saw some stars while the rest didn't.
The conclusion from these observations was that sunlight scattering from dust suspended above the lunar surface was making the sky up to 13 to 15 times brighter than the Earth’s nighttime sky with a full Moon present. This glow would certainly hinder daytime observations in the visible and UV from the lunar surface casting some doubt on the idyllic view of using the Moon as an observatory site at these wavelengths. Data from the NASA’s LADEE (Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer) mission completed in April 2014 should be able to shed more light on the role of lunar dust in brightening the lunar sky.
originally posted by: GaryN
It is known that UV light will cause silicon/silica submicron particles, such as fumed silica, to glow at visible wavelenghts. The light they detected is not from scattered sunlight, there is none to scatter, but from solar UV excitation of the minute particles.
You know full well that light travels through space in the visible spectrum,
You are drawing an erroneous conclusion by joining two different pieces of information together inappropriately.
We always talk about seeing the view of planet Earth and how beautiful it is and you come to expect that.
"But what people don't mention that much is when you look in the opposite direction and you see how dark space is.
"It is just the blackest black and that was a real surprise to me."
originally posted by: GaryN
There is no proof that I am willing to accept
There is not enough floating dust to explain the brightness of the moon in your made up theory.
Chang'e always has a very bright object in the sky - either the sun or the Earth.
Both of these will wash out a long exposure, as has been explained to you many times.
Peake does not say he can't see stars - he is describing the depth of the black he sees, not the absence of stars.
"Telescope Alpha" is only the first step in a much more ambitious plan. The League hopes to convince NASA to attach a telescope 14 to 16 inches in aperture to the International Space Station sometime between 2008 and 2010. Controlled remotely by a team of amateurs on the ground, the envisioned telescope would concentrate on "taking pictures of the universe that interest the whole human race," notes imaging expert Richard Berry, who is coordinating efforts to gain NASA's approval. "All of the images and data from the ISS-AT would be available for use in the classroom and as a basis for observing proposals from educators and their classes."
The Amateur Space Telescope project got its start in early 1979 when a handful of enthusiastic students at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in Troy, NY realized that they could build their own space telescope using off-the-shelf hardware and launch it as a payload on the soon-to-be-introduced Space Shuttle. The AST would be the amateur (and much less expensive) equivalent of NASA’s Hubble Space telescope (HST) then under development.