It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Eric Garner's daughter on video: Al Sharpton 'All about the money'

page: 2
12
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Exposing anyone worth millions where their entire lively hood and future relies upon preaching to a cult audience is indeed dangerous. He is the king of racial tension. The journalist's life may well be in danger. Anyone who speaks out against Sharpton gets hammered by race baiters and race apologists.

20 billion for what!!??

I know you like to think you know it all, but really you are clueless little Charlie


So you're similarly fed up with the paid "race baiter" O'Keefe and his pals at brietbart.com who make money through stirring racial tensions? If not, why do they get a pass?




posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Exposing anyone worth millions where their entire lively hood and future relies upon preaching to a cult audience is indeed dangerous. He is the king of racial tension. The journalist's life may well be in danger. Anyone who speaks out against Sharpton gets hammered by race baiters and race apologists.

20 billion for what!!??

I know you like to think you know it all, but really you are clueless little Charlie


So you're similarly fed up with the paid "race baiter" O'Keefe and his pals at brietbart.com who make money through stirring racial tensions? If not, why do they get a pass?


Isn't everything conservatives say considered "stirring racial tensions" in order to keep the divide?
Truth hurts sometime, doesn't mean it's not the truth.

ETA: No, in not a conservative.. just to clear the air.

edit on 24-2-2015 by doompornjunkie because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: doompornjunkie

No, you haven't once stated your stance on this snitch putting other people in the same danger he was busy expressing he was in...

Quite the opposite of telling us your stance on that, you've dodged the question numerous times and repeated your hatred of Sharpton...




Eric Garner's daughter and others are now all in danger, like the "journalist"...
Against their will...

What... Is... Your... Stance... On... That!!!



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: doompornjunkie

No, you haven't once stated your stance on this snitch putting other people in the same danger he was busy expressing he was in...

Quite the opposite of telling us your stance on that, you've dodged the question numerous times and repeated your hatred of Sharpton...




Eric Garner's daughter and others are now all in danger, like the "journalist"...
Against their will...

What... Is... Your... Stance... On... That!!!


As to putting people in the same danger he may have been/is in:

THE TRUTH!!!
%#^$ security, thats what the 2nd amendment is for (sorry you are in the UK and do not understand) ALWAYS EXPOSE THE TRUTH!

ETA: I cannot fathom why anyone wouldn't expose corruption in fear of violence. Make the world better, fix this mess. End the race divide and expose these clowns for who they are. If this crap was take care of swiftly, maybe some would be injured/killed, but in the long run it would save lives, and improve the futures of all Americans... It's a bit like the decision to drop Fatman and little boy.
edit on 24-2-2015 by doompornjunkie because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: doompornjunkie

LMAOROFLOL sooooo.... despite him uncovering people who lie and distort, he is a hack because he only goes after the left?? I am personally thrilled whenever ANY liar is called out for who they are, be them left, right, blue , or black (ohh shouldn't have used that non-color)


If this were really true, would you be "personally thrilled" to consume the lies and distortions of O'Keefe, a man who makes his living stirring racial tension in white conservatives and who has been already been exposed as a fraud?

I think the answer is obvious from the bias in your own comments:

"or black (ohh shouldn't have used that non-color)"
"another source that could be dismissed as being under the influence of 'white privilege' or some other BS PC term."

His agenda is aligned with your worldview, therefore its acceptable. Pretending that it's anything else is disingenuous.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: doompornjunkie

Yes I'm sure you'd feel the same if he exposed your loved ones feelings about someone who could potentially have them killed.



Screw your political attempt at promoting the 2nd in a thread that has sod all to do with it!
edit on 24-2-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: doompornjunkie

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Exposing anyone worth millions where their entire lively hood and future relies upon preaching to a cult audience is indeed dangerous. He is the king of racial tension. The journalist's life may well be in danger. Anyone who speaks out against Sharpton gets hammered by race baiters and race apologists.

20 billion for what!!??

I know you like to think you know it all, but really you are clueless little Charlie


So you're similarly fed up with the paid "race baiter" O'Keefe and his pals at brietbart.com who make money through stirring racial tensions? If not, why do they get a pass?


Isn't everything conservatives say considered "stirring racial tensions" in order to keep the divide?
Truth hurts sometime, doesn't mean it's not the truth.

ETA: No, in not a conservative.. just to clear the air.


No, there are plenty of conservatives who don't say things to stir racial tensions. Did I say otherwise? If I wasn't clear, I think Al Sharpton is a slimy opportunistic scumbag who derives wealth and influence directly from inflaming racial tension. That doesn't mean I'm going to be a cheerleader for another person who does the exact same thing.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: doompornjunkie

Yes I'm sure you'd feel the same if he exposed your loved ones feelings about someone who could potentially have them killed.



Screw your political attempt at promoting the 2nd in a thread that has sod all to do with it!


Dude no... you seriously don't get it.
I have gone head to head with people who have threatened my family and myself. This is no political attempt... this is real life. Never stand down for what is right.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: greencmp

I thought we all had this guy figured out by now. If we haven't, then this exposé is necessary.


Even if we all already had Sharpton figured out, I think the one significant thing that this video exposes is the fact that even the people he professes to help do not trust him.

Prior to this, Sharpton could get away with presenting people like Eric Garner's daughter as an advocate and supporter. This video kind of exposes that even Sharpton's "advocates" don't really trust him or support him.

Who is left to support Al if even the people he "helps" don't want anything to do with him?

But I doubt anything will change. Jesse Jackson has been getting away with the same racket for decades. As long as the media continues to promote and entertain these clowns, the race-baiting drum will beat on.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: doompornjunkie

Says who?

You?



What gives him the right to put others in danger without their consent or knowledge?


Don't say "truth" again that's not a right at all...

Where is their right to decide?




Stop sticking up for this POS with illogical input!



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Well, I'd say the messenger here has been shot, stabbed, and poisoned. All that's left is to decapitate the body and drive a stake through the heart.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:44 AM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs



Stop sticking up for this POS with illogical input!


illogical? Don't you agree that Sharpton is a fraud? I believe 'fraud' could be considered a paraphrase from many of your posts on page 1...

Please pick a side and stick with it.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: doompornjunkie

It's quite clear that Sharpton is a fraud, even among 75% of the black community this is well known.
I don't/didn't need an unethical documentary from a morally reprehensible "journalist" to know that.

That's like asking me to pick a side between the NOI & the KKK...

I have no time for either of them...



So no I won't pick a side...
I'll continue defend Eric Garner's daughters right to privacy, especially in cases where what she has said may put her life in danger!!!



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: doompornjunkie

It's quite clear that Sharpton is a fraud, even among 75% of the black community this is well known.
I don't/didn't need an unethical documentary from a morally reprehensible "journalist" to know that.

That's like asking me to pick a side between the NOI & the KKK...

I have no time for either of them...



So no I won't pick a side...
I'll continue defend Eric Garner's daughters right to privacy, especially in cases where what she has said may put her life in danger!!!


Well, it's time for me to get off.

However all I can say is I am glad the truth about Al Sharpton as stated by Eric Garner's daughter had been published, whatever the consequences may be. I'm sick of this made up Black vs White narrative. In reality it's just not so. White really has no impact on black, black impacts black. Think about it, take it as you will.

-DPJ



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

If you don't want your view publicized don't express your opinions to a known journalist in public. This is the USA why are you surprised this is common.

Maybe they were secretly recorded but more people must be aware of these evil peoples agenda, so who care how the information gets spread.

I despise people like al sharpton and race baiter like him



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: doompornjunkie

Exposing the truth is an admirable goal, but i wouldn't trust someone with obvious biases and agendas to provide me with it.

If O'Keefe wants to be taken seriously, he should adopt standard codes of ethics and venture on from there. Right now, i'm not convinced he is providing us the objective truth. He's going around with his mates and secretly filming people while asking leading questions.
edit on 24-2-2015 by daaskapital because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 12:16 PM
link   
I guess the average ATSer is sophisticated enough to know what Sharpton is, but the great number of 'low-information voters' still don't understand who he is, because the media establishment props him up and refuses to investigate him. maybe this project will force the mediaites to shed some light on him and his operations.

hidden cameras were considered cutting-edge heroic journalism in the early days of 60 Minutes. is the method now invalid because someone on the right is using same? too many people will not be honest in public.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 12:26 PM
link   
a reply to: works4dhs

There's a difference between being a hero and being a tool.

I consider someone like Antonio Salas a 'hero'. Someone who has actually gone undercover to expose crimes...someone who has directly put their life on the line to make the world a better place. O'Keefe is nothing more than a wannabe unethical journalist who was reporting in order to confirm his biases. There is a large difference there, and there are ethical boundaries which need to be considered.

It would be good to see the media investigate people such as Sharpton, as there are reasons to do so. I would rather have a tried and tested investigative journalist do it than some guy going into it intending to shape the story to his own agenda.



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 12:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: daaskapital
a reply to: works4dhs

There's a difference between being a hero and being a tool.

I consider someone like Antonio Salas a 'hero'. Someone who has actually gone undercover to expose crimes...someone who has directly put their life on the line to make the world a better place. O'Keefe is nothing more than a wannabe unethical journalist who was reporting in order to confirm his biases. There is a large difference there, and there are ethical boundaries which need to be considered.

It would be good to see the media investigate people such as Sharpton, as there are reasons to do so. I would rather have a tried and tested investigative journalist do it than some guy going into it intending to shape the story to his own agenda.



so O'Keefe and Lila Rose going undercover to expose Planned Parenthood's deceit doesn't make the world a better place? Isn't informing the public a good thing, especially sacred cows that the aforementioned Media Establishment won't touch?
I'd love to see 60 Minutes or similar operation go after Sharpton, but THEY DON'T. He gets a pass. So plan B, an independent muckraker sheds some light on his operation.
this isn't a question on whether he has an agenda or not; question is, is his reporting accurate?



posted on Feb, 24 2015 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: daaskapital

It's not just that he has a political bias. Having a bias might lead to a lack of objectivity and that's bad enough but O'Keefe specializes in manufacturing propaganda. His usual tactic is to cajole unsuspecting people into saying things — and people may be surprised how easily others can be persuaded into saying whatever, when the cops do it we call it "entrapment" — and then takes the video back and chops it up and glues it all back together with his own narrative.


edit on 2015-2-24 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join