It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
Exposing anyone worth millions where their entire lively hood and future relies upon preaching to a cult audience is indeed dangerous. He is the king of racial tension. The journalist's life may well be in danger. Anyone who speaks out against Sharpton gets hammered by race baiters and race apologists.
20 billion for what!!??
I know you like to think you know it all, but really you are clueless little Charlie
originally posted by: theantediluvian
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
Exposing anyone worth millions where their entire lively hood and future relies upon preaching to a cult audience is indeed dangerous. He is the king of racial tension. The journalist's life may well be in danger. Anyone who speaks out against Sharpton gets hammered by race baiters and race apologists.
20 billion for what!!??
I know you like to think you know it all, but really you are clueless little Charlie
So you're similarly fed up with the paid "race baiter" O'Keefe and his pals at brietbart.com who make money through stirring racial tensions? If not, why do they get a pass?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: doompornjunkie
No, you haven't once stated your stance on this snitch putting other people in the same danger he was busy expressing he was in...
Quite the opposite of telling us your stance on that, you've dodged the question numerous times and repeated your hatred of Sharpton...
Eric Garner's daughter and others are now all in danger, like the "journalist"...
Against their will...
What... Is... Your... Stance... On... That!!!
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
LMAOROFLOL sooooo.... despite him uncovering people who lie and distort, he is a hack because he only goes after the left?? I am personally thrilled whenever ANY liar is called out for who they are, be them left, right, blue , or black (ohh shouldn't have used that non-color)
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
originally posted by: theantediluvian
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
Exposing anyone worth millions where their entire lively hood and future relies upon preaching to a cult audience is indeed dangerous. He is the king of racial tension. The journalist's life may well be in danger. Anyone who speaks out against Sharpton gets hammered by race baiters and race apologists.
20 billion for what!!??
I know you like to think you know it all, but really you are clueless little Charlie
So you're similarly fed up with the paid "race baiter" O'Keefe and his pals at brietbart.com who make money through stirring racial tensions? If not, why do they get a pass?
Isn't everything conservatives say considered "stirring racial tensions" in order to keep the divide?
Truth hurts sometime, doesn't mean it's not the truth.
ETA: No, in not a conservative.. just to clear the air.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: doompornjunkie
Yes I'm sure you'd feel the same if he exposed your loved ones feelings about someone who could potentially have them killed.
Screw your political attempt at promoting the 2nd in a thread that has sod all to do with it!
originally posted by: greencmp
I thought we all had this guy figured out by now. If we haven't, then this exposé is necessary.
Stop sticking up for this POS with illogical input!
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: doompornjunkie
It's quite clear that Sharpton is a fraud, even among 75% of the black community this is well known.
I don't/didn't need an unethical documentary from a morally reprehensible "journalist" to know that.
That's like asking me to pick a side between the NOI & the KKK...
I have no time for either of them...
So no I won't pick a side...
I'll continue defend Eric Garner's daughters right to privacy, especially in cases where what she has said may put her life in danger!!!
originally posted by: daaskapital
a reply to: works4dhs
There's a difference between being a hero and being a tool.
I consider someone like Antonio Salas a 'hero'. Someone who has actually gone undercover to expose crimes...someone who has directly put their life on the line to make the world a better place. O'Keefe is nothing more than a wannabe unethical journalist who was reporting in order to confirm his biases. There is a large difference there, and there are ethical boundaries which need to be considered.
It would be good to see the media investigate people such as Sharpton, as there are reasons to do so. I would rather have a tried and tested investigative journalist do it than some guy going into it intending to shape the story to his own agenda.