It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Muaddib
eeer...right, i forgot,.... melatonin/regenmacher always makes such claims when the evidence does not support his claims...
only if you excerpt from Mann et al does melatonin/regenmacher claims "that is real science"....
Originally posted by melatonin
The paper you cited focuses on solar radiation.
I guess I should ask what the 16/106 reference is related to?
You lads are way too serious in these debates.
I certainly try not to be tooooo serious.
[edit on 23-6-2007 by melatonin]
Many of the assertions Gore makes in his movie, ''An Inconvenient Truth,'' have been refuted by science, both before and after he made them. Gore can show sincerity in his plea for scientific honesty by publicly acknowledging where science has rebutted his claims.
For example, Gore claims that Himalayan glaciers are shrinking and global warming is to blame. Yet the September 2006 issue of the American Meteorological Society's Journal of Climate reported, "Glaciers are growing in the Himalayan Mountains, confounding global warming alarmists who recently claimed the glaciers were shrinking and that global warming was to blame."
Originally posted by edsinger
Still doesn't address the point that when the data does not back Gore's agenda, he does not retract his 'misleading or false' statements. NOT ONCE has he done so.
And again, it is because it will not serve the 'tulipwalker' agenda that is being presented as dire facts.
The Himalayas (also Himalaya, IPA: [hɪ'mɑlijə], [ˌhɪmə'leɪjə]) are a mountain range in Asia, separating the Indian subcontinent from the Tibetan Plateau. By extension, it is also the name of the massive mountain system which includes the Himalaya proper, the Karakoram, the Hindu Kush, and a host of minor ranges extending from the Pamir Knot.
Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 30, No. 3, 285-306 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0309133306pp478ra
© 2006 SAGE Publications
The status of research on glaciers and global glacier recession: a review
Roger G. Barry
National Snow and Ice Data Center/WDC for Glaciology, Boulder; CIRES and Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0449, USA
Mountain glaciers are key indicators of climate change, although the climatic variables involved differ regionally and temporally. Nevertheless, there has been substantial glacier retreat since the Little Ice Age and this has accelerated over the last two to three decades. Documenting these changes is hampered by the paucity of observational data. This review outlines the measurements that are available, new techniques that incorporate remotely sensed data, and major findings around the world. The focus is on changes in glacier area, rather than estimates of mass balance and volume changes that address the role of glacier melt in global sea-level rise. The glacier observations needed for global climate monitoring are also outlined.
Originally posted by edsinger
So your saying its final - global warming is caused by man.
Again, how the hell did they grow olives in Germany in the middle ages long before the industrial revolution?
What are the chances that it is 90% or greater caused by SOLAR activity??
I mean I sure as hell will not blame the martian ice caps melting on SUV's and Coal fired power plants!
Originally posted by melatonin
por moi?
The scientific evidence suggests that man is having a significant influence on the current period of climate change. Not the only cause, but an important one.
Originally posted by melatonin
Very unlikely. At most 25-35%, more likely much less.
Originally posted by melatonin
Neither would I. Like the earth, It seems to be mainly due to local effects...
Originally posted by melatonin
space.newscientist.com...
No solar hiding place for greenhouse sceptics
Quirin Schiermeier
Top of pageAbstractSun not to blame for global warming.
A study has confirmed that there are no grounds to blame the Sun for recent global warming. The analysis shows that global warming since 1985 has been caused neither by an increase in solar radiation nor by a decrease in the flux of galactic cosmic rays (M. Lockwood and C. Fröhlich Proc. R. Soc. A doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1880; 2007). Some researchers had suggested that the latter might influence global warming through an involvement in cloud formation.
"This paper is the final nail in the coffin for people who would like to make the Sun responsible for present global warming," says Stefan Rahmstorf, a climate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.
Originally posted by edsinger
So I would not argue that some scientists believe it is not a factor, but not ALL scientists do. Still, if the sun has very little play in it, explain why the Martian caps are melting also? There are no SUV's there the last I checked.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Has anyone taken this into consideration?
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Ancient Greenland Was Green
5 Jul, 2007
Eske Willerslev's study published today in Science overturns all previous assumptions about biological life and the climate in ancient Greenland.
www.scitizen.com...
Eske Willerslev is a professor of evolutionary biology in the Department of Biology at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark.