It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Muaddib That's hard science and no "speculations, disinformation or lies."
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
ITS SIMPLE HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE! it truly is. (not climatology or weather models etc, or analysing the change and type of effects, just the basis of adding greenhouse gases to the earth closed climate system., and anyone with this Basic understanding understands too the risks and factors of FEEDBACK within such a system. Yous see it does not matter if we are causing 100% of it or 0.001 % of it in a interrelated closed and interdependant long term system such as the earth and climate)
Originally posted by Long Lance
feedback can be negative, too, ie. stabilizing, didn't you know that? if it was as simple as you claimed, the earth would never have gotten out of warm times with high CO2 concentrations, obviously. it is said that the primordial atmosphere contained more CO2 than oxygen, isn't it? incompatible data?!
something's got to give i presume.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I was thinking about the decrease of solar activity, here's the thing ,
With this decrease of solar activity< what if,
The only thing keeping us out of another ICE age is global warming and co2 emissions,
Now say we happen to correct global warming and cut off our nose to spite our own face,
what a pickle.
So with the admission that the data was manipulated, the global emergency over since the earth has not got any hotter for quite a few years, will you at least consider I was right?
Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it
Updated Global Temperature: No global warming for 17 years, 6 months – (No Warming for 210 Months)
originally posted by: edsinger
So your links are better than mine?
How did the Germans grow olives before they were Germans?
originally posted by: curme
The American Policy Center, where the article is from, want to do away with regulations that force big business not to pollute, well, as much as they do. It costs money to dispose of waste, produce cleaner emissions, and not belch poison from factories. This is about how to make more money, not what is actually happening to our environment. Some people don't believe in 'pay as you go' but would rather rape the world now, and let someone else worry about the burden later.
originally posted by: TerryDon79As for the other thing? They didn't grow olives before they were Germans. Don't understand what that has to do with climate change though.