It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So no, the phrase "Origins of Life" wouldn't favor "Darwinists" because origins of life has nothing to do with evolution.
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Shadow Herder
For something to be created it needs a creator.
Evolution happens with or without a creator, it'll happen regardless.
The issue with renaming the forum is that it's a forum about beginnings, origins, and it might involves creationism. Evolution is an after affect of the beginnings.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: WakeUpBeer
I am one who will support putting creation threads into the hoax bin. I also agree that the majority of convo in this forum revolves around the merits of evolution. Biology makes it clear that animals, plants, fungus, bacteria, etc, were not blinked into existance as creation and young earthers proclaim.
A creationist is like a child who checks his closet and under his bed at night. Finds them empty, and still claims that monsters are going to eat him. Lets do away with it once and for all.
Origins and evolution for the win. Lets step into the present and deny the most ignorant idea in the world.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Woodcarver
A creationist is someone who makes those monsters under your bed. You need to widen your scope of reality.
Humans currently right now are *Creating* (Snthesizing life)
Your comments against *creationism* is not only ignorant but also invalidated by science.