It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because deaths are not captured completely by NEISS-AIP, patients who were dead on arrival or died in EDs were excluded.
In 1994, the most recent year for which published data are available, an estimated 4.7 million Generovirus cases occurred in the United States, and approximately 799,700 persons required medical care (1).
Of an estimated 333,700 patients treated for Generovirus in emergency departments (EDs) in 1994 (2), approximately 6,000 (1.8%) were hospitalized (3).
Generovirus rates were highest among children aged 5--9 years.
Approximately 154,625 (42.0%) Generovirus cases occurred among children aged 15 years, the difference between the rate for males (102.9) and females (88.0) was not statistically significant. The number of cases increased slightly during April--September, with a peak in July (11.1%).
originally posted by: ColeYounger
We need real, scientific, double-blind, peer reviewed data, and we need to know who's funding it.
originally posted by: ColeYounger
As per the norm, people don't want to do the research and seek out real data.
I've personally witnessed pro-vaccine parents assume all vaccines are safe because a doctor or someone from the government said so. I've also seen anti-vaccine parents assume all vaccines cause autism and ADHD because someone on a YouTube video said so.
We need real, scientific, double-blind, peer reviewed data, and we need to know who's funding it.
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." -Marcia Angell, MD ("Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption." NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
People need accurate, unbiased information to weigh the risks and benefits of any medical procedure. Pharma is spending billions per year to prevent you from getting fair and unbiased information. They have 100% legal immunity thanks to buying enough politicians and the revolving door between the CDC and the vaccine industry.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: Halfswede
Because most people are factually uneducated about a topic, but have an ingrained need to feel like they're doing something, even if it's out of ignorance.
The only thing that makes a parent a bad parent when it comes to vaccinations is if they don't educate themselves on each and every one and, if skeptical of the need for the vaccine, properly research the numbers in regard to the symptoms of the illness.
Measles, for instance, is basically harmless, with a very low chance of developing a severe symptom. I haven't compared probabilities, but it seems like most people have a higher chance at developing a severe side-effect from some modern medicines than they do an illness like the measles.
originally posted by: jimmyx
you are the one that is not informed....in other words, your statement..."measles, for instance, is basically harmless, with a very low chance of developing a severe symptom"...is a lie.........please educate yourself before making such a rash statement
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: damwel
That's e problem with research. You look for the facts but when they don't come out the way you want then they must be " in bed with big Pharma". Just vaccinate your kids, you have a responsibility to do that.
originally posted by: damwel
That's e problem with research. You look for the facts but when they don't come out the way you want then they must be " in bed with big Pharma". Just vaccinate your kids, you have a responsibility to do that.
originally posted by: Halfswede
Not saying there is a causal relationship, but there is a huge, huge incentive to prevent disclosure of a possible one--even the tiniest. At the very least, I wouldn't blindly trust what is being sold.