It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Neo of course won't mention that regulations can and do stop this BS all over the world - but that would require "big government".
There've been plenty of great threads on the codex:
Codex Alimentarius (Mandate That Will Starve 3 Billion People to be In Place by 12/31/09)
HELLO? Codex Alimentarius? This December 31st people!
Article: NUTRICIDE: The Killing Camps of Codex Alimentarius
Codex Alimentarius has begun, right on schedule
Codex Alimentarius Summarized in 7 Points
originally posted by: JIMC5499
What gives the New York AG the authority to order anything? I believe that it is the FDA's job to handle things like this.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires companies to verify that their products are safe and properly labeled for their contents, but unlike drugs, supplements do not undergo the agency's rigorous evaluation process, which scrutinizes everything about the drug—from the design of clinical trials to the severity of side effects to the conditions under which the drug is manufactured.
If the producers of herbal supplements fail to identify all the ingredients on a product’s label, a consumer with food allergies, or who is taking medication for an unrelated illness, is taking a potentially serious health risk every time a contaminated herbal supplement is ingested. The Attorney General's investigation is focused on potential violations of New York's General Business Law and Executive Law, including deceptive practices and deceptive advertising.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
That was my thought also!
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
Millions of people are going to find out what "Placebo Effect" really means...
a reply to: JIMC5499
The FDA says it's up to the manufacturers and distributors to make sure they are selling what is on the product label, so how would the FDA know if there was a substitution? Do they actually do any testing?
www.fda.gov...
FDA regulates both finished dietary supplement products and dietary ingredients. FDA regulates dietary supplements under a different set of regulations than those covering "conventional" foods and drug products. Under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA):
Manufacturers and distributors of dietary supplements and dietary ingredients are prohibited from marketing products that are adulterated or misbranded. That means that these firms are responsible for evaluating the safety and labeling of their products before marketing to ensure that they meet all the requirements of DSHEA and FDA regulations.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires companies to verify that their products are safe and properly labeled for their contents, but unlike drugs, supplements do not undergo the agency's rigorous evaluation process, which scrutinizes everything about the drug—from the design of clinical trials to the severity of side effects to the conditions under which the drug is manufactured.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
...
Yeah, this is crazy. Saw this in the NY Times this morning. 4/5 supplements, FOUR out of FIVE, were found to not have exactly what they said they were supposed to!! And some were "leading brands!"
....
Which brand names? It would be far more valuable to have a list of the brands than anything else. They weren't listed in the linked article.
originally posted by: [post=18960553]neo96
Nice potshot.
I guess someone missed the op where that 'big government', and regulations didn't do SNIP.
Yes, adding unlabeled sawdust fillers may violate FDA regulations, but it's unclear how they would ever find out about it. The FDA isn't mentioned in the story so I'm not assuming they did any testing, though the NY attorney general's office may have notified or otherwise copied the FDA on the correspondence they sent to the retailers.
originally posted by: Anyafaj
So as far as the FDA is concerned, if it's safe for you, they're cool. It could be ground up wood inside the pill. If it's safe for your body, they could care less.
Good questions, I'd like to know what brands were a problem also, some retailers even have store brands. As you know many things are sourced overseas and if this is the case (which it almost certainly is with some supplements), the attorney general may have no direct course of action against the manufacturer, who not being located in the state of New York isn't subject to the laws of that state. So they go after who they can, the retailer who is located in NY and who is subject to those laws. If it's a store brand, only the retailer may know which manufacturer they came from as they don't always include that information on the store brand label.
originally posted by: diggindirt
Why do we not get the name of the manufacturers rather than the retail outlets? This is nuts. The retail outlets aren't in the business of testing their products. This would be like finding a bad batch of birth control pills being sold by several chains and blaming the retailer for the failure of the product. Who is making and distributing faulty products?
Is there any reason to think someone writing a review on Amazon knows more about whether the contents of the product match the label than I do? The other reviewers would probably also be reluctant to spend $150 to test a $10 bottle of supplements, so they probably wouldn't do that, so exactly how would the reviews help? That I know they at least got a placebo effect from taking sawdust or other fillers?
originally posted by: neo96
Try Amazon, and read the reviews.
Bout the only thing one can do.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Yes, adding unlabeled sawdust fillers may violate FDA regulations, but it's unclear how they would ever find out about it. The FDA isn't mentioned in the story so I'm not assuming they did any testing, though the NY attorney general's office may have notified or otherwise copied the FDA on the correspondence they sent to the retailers.
originally posted by: Anyafaj
So as far as the FDA is concerned, if it's safe for you, they're cool. It could be ground up wood inside the pill. If it's safe for your body, they could care less.
I said unlabeled wood would be a violation. You said no it wouldn't, just look for it on the label. One of us is missing something.
originally posted by: Anyafaj
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Actually it would not violate the FDA. You will find wood in a lot of your food, including your cereals. Just look for the ingredient cellulose.
That's a bit unsettling to not have any idea where it was manufactured, to me, but I'm not sure that violates any labeling laws. If they misrepresented the country of origin then it would.
originally posted by: diggindirt
I find that Nature's Bounty has no country of manufacture on the label.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
I said unlabeled wood would be a violation. You said no it wouldn't, just look for it on the label. One of us is missing something.
originally posted by: Anyafaj
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Actually it would not violate the FDA. You will find wood in a lot of your food, including your cereals. Just look for the ingredient cellulose.
originally posted by: CactusJim
Just throwing this out there. On my local news this morning, 2/4, they were reporting on this. The mentioned three times that this affected the "store brands" of the supplements. I know Walgreens, GNC and CVS have store brands. I guess Wal-Mart would be Equate. I'm not sure if they all get them from the same manufacturer or what. Just relaying what I heard on local news.