It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: LittleByLittle
You can define "corruption in a certain way" if you only read that verse...
Maybe you should look into other verses that do define it...
Such as spreading disorder among the land, or in others words tyrannical governance...
How about the verse immediately after?
Which says "Except those who repent before you overpower them. Then be sure that Allah is merciful & forgiving."
Don't cherry pick the Quran, that makes you no better than the Clerics & Mullahs who do the same to spread hatred.
The poll, conducted by the Pew Research Center, surveyed samples of the population from eleven majority Muslim countries — Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Palestinian territories, Senegal, Tunisia, and Turkey — asking about their views on Islamic extremism and the violence carried out in its name.
The results show that a median of 67 percent of those reached out to are either somewhat or very concerned about extremism in their countries. In some states, such as Lebanon and Tunisia, the number climbs above 70 percent. Turkey actually stands out as the only country polled where more than half of the those surveyed say they are not concerned about extremism.
Support for suicide bombing has likewise plummeted throughout the Islamic world compared to past years. In Lebanon alone, the number of respondents who believed that suicide bombing is sometimes or often justified dropped from 74 percent in 2002 to 33 percent today. Pakistanis showed the least support for the tactic, with 89 percent of those surveyed opposed to its use in any circumstances.
"For the most part, support for suicide bombing is not correlated with devoutness,” Pew wrote in its results. “Generally, Muslims who say they pray five times per day are no more likely to support targeting civilians to protect Islam than those who pray less often.
This current Terrorism which is 100% radicalized Muslims
The fact that he never denounced the violent acts by so called Muslims was very telling for me.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: Primordial
How do you equate "not concerned" with "ok with it"...
That's a hell of a way to twist an already suspect poll...
Does that mean all the people of the West who aren't brainwashed by the fearmongering are "ok with extremism"...
Or does it mean that they're "not concerned"?
I'm not "concerned" because it isn't as much of a threat as it's made out to be...
That does not mean I am "ok" with it when it does occur...
Today, al Qaeda is widely reviled, with a median of 57% across the 11 Muslims publics surveyed saying they have an unfavorable opinion of the terrorist organization that launched the twin attacks on New York City and Washington, DC more than a decade ago.
originally posted by: flice
originally posted by: MiddleClassWhiteBoy
The responses in this thread are disgusting! Ayatollah??? Screw him and his religion! What is it you people don't understand???? Islam is completely incompatible with western ideals and American values! I suggest if you call yourself a real American you look back on the writings of Jefferson or Churchill!! No wonder America is being destroyed and everything we hold dear being dismantled with people actually listening to a fundamental religious crackpot from a third world slum stuck in the 8th century! I'm ashamed what Americans will listen to and self doubt about!
America is completely incompatible with a modern peaceful world where you respect sovereignty of nations and their access to their own resources...
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: new_hereThat too, but what he is saying is that Islam is "this dynamic and effective reality in today’s world", and that people should find out about Islam through a means that presents it as such, rather than the way that it comes out as through the news, that makes it seem like only a negative thing.
I believe he is trying to say "don't drink the kool-aid' concerning what is really going on in the war on terror. In the last line:
My point is that it is negative.
Should we go to war with every culture that believes in more than a single god, and for what benefit?
No one is threatened by someone else's belief, except when that belief happens to be Islam.
Well unless you are a Kurd, a christian, a Zoroastrian, Jewish ect then yea why worry about ISIS. You would generaly be ok as long as you were not one of these.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: interupt42
The fact that he never denounced the violent acts by so called Muslims was very telling for me.
And you are wrong. The Ayatollah denounced the terrorist attacks in France and in other nations where terrorist attacks take place.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: Primordial
You must understand the difference between Hamas & Hezbollah compared to Al Qaeda & the Taliban...so it's not surprise people do not find those first two unfavourable...
Also being the Middle East, most Muslims are not really concerned with being aligned with Terrorists because that is not the perception of their Media, Government or communities...
Muslims in the West do have concerns with beings lumped with terrorists because we hear it being done everyday...
So again I can understand people in the Middle East having no concern with being portrayed as terrorists because all in all they probably don't realise that comparison is being made in other regions.
You did the twisting...
I added perspective.