It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Just pointing out it's a semantics word game. Thing is, we're not at war with "christian" terrorists. It's really a moot point.
No, not all are terrorists, but almost ALL back them up with their ideology. Same #, different pile.
originally posted by: markosity1973
Those are the only two terrorist attacks since 9/11 and here is my source
Commentators have debated whether the perpetrator of the attack, Man Haron Monis, was in fact a terrorist and whether his actions can be classified as an act of terrorism. One terrorism expert described Monis' actions as those of a "lone wolf terrorist ... driven by a desire for attention and to be in the spotlight."[22][23] Another wrote in an opinion column that the attack "was very different from first-generation or second-generation terrorist attacks—but it was terrorism, and terrorism of a brutal and more unpredictable sort."[24] Scott Stewart supervisor of the analysis of terrorism and security issues for Statfor said that this hostage-incident exhibits many of the elements associated with grassroots terrorism.[25] By contrast, criminologist Mark Lauchs stated that the event "was not about religion and neither was it a terrorist attack."[22]
Just because the site has a clear agenda that you disagree with, it does not make the data untrue or any less relevant. I only linked the page to the number of attacks since 9/11 because I do not necesarily agree with everything else they have to say.
1780 attacks per year is a lot from one religion. Remember that yes while they are from different organizations with different ideologies, the common thread is the spread of Islam by force.
Facts are facts and everything I presented is a fact, I've provided sources for my Australia claim now, so you can see I am no liar and how easily the data can be manipulated for a given agenda. I've provided the list of terror attacks in 2014 so readers can count the number of Islamic organisations involved for themselves. And I provided it from neutral Wikipedia, so there is no phobic agenda for you to argue against.
Islam has a global agenda and everyone has the right to know the truth based in factual evidence, which I have provided.
1. It's ALL gotta be an external threat.
2. Did you honestly believe this was a valid rebuttal? Because it is pretty silly.
They are painting the Muslims are bad picture, and despite ALL the evidence to show that Christians can be just as bad, that is all ignored.
Or is it when the media is saying something you agree with, then they aren't lying or pushing an agenda?
No... AQ has a different ideology than the Taliban who has a different ideology as Hamas who has a different ideology as Boko Haram who has a different ideology as ISIS. Are you so naive that you would HONESTLY believe that all share similar ideologies? That is insane, even at the basics, half the Muslim world would NEVER agree with ISIS because it is Sunni and not all Muslims are Sunni.
originally posted by: FlySolo
1. Well no, I don't think so...if Christian fanatics suddenly rose up and were doing the same, I don't think it would be long before people turned on them too. But for the most part, Christians have reformed their violent past and are not trying to form their own state.
2. Yes I think it is a valid rebuttal. The short answer is Christians aren't flocking to the middle east and cutting off the heads of infidels, raping and forcing non-christian women into slavery.
No, Muslim Terrorists are painting Muslims in a bad picture. They're doing it, the media is just reporting it. You're not suggesting there's a party going on in the ME are you? Perhaps I missed something in your thread which seems quantify Christian fundamentalists are on equal grounds as per IS fundamentalists in regards to terrorism. Did something happen in the news I'm not aware of?
No, I'm disagreeing with what you're saying. I don't think your OP has any merit. I'm beginning to think, with your statement, that you believe the media is lying about what's going on in the ME.
That's why I said the religion is the mother load of bad ideas. Same # different pile. Their difference in ideology is based on who's linage from Mohammad should rightfully be the Caliph. I know at least the Sunni and Shia feel that way. Who's bloodline. But again, you make another epic moot point. You seem to think a slight variance in ideology precludes the over-all brutality of the Taliban, Al' queda, IS, on whatever other faction of Islam that are warring right now? Suddenly they're the nice guys or something?
What I DON'T agree with is the jump in logic that because all this crap is going down in the ME, that means the 1st world is in danger of Muslims, because THAT logic doesn't gel.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Unless YOU have witnessed AMERICAN forces shooting innocents ON ORDER then YOUR myth is FAR more of a FARCE.
We are shown EVERYDAY what you attempt to to sepreate from the whole. HAVE YOU GOT ANYidea what we would do to our own if they went down to mexico and started mitilating CHILDREN or cutting heads of Women?
AS THEIR OWN scriptures state, yet you think you KNOW better simply because YOU FEEL bad?
Knights TEMPLARS havent existed since the CRUSADES onlt NAMES are used NAD THEY DOND hidiously EXCUTE THOUSANDS in an attempt to FORCE themselves on OTHER S .
Your arguments are progressive and your mind is completely SMOKED.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Krazysh0t
What I DON'T agree with is the jump in logic that because all this crap is going down in the ME, that means the 1st world is in danger of Muslims, because THAT logic doesn't gel.
Trolls live in holes. Where have you been living since 911?
We have lost thousands of American lives to the pages in the koran.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No as a scout I was gifted with INTELLECT ,and a suspicion of hostilities would preclude my doing so.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Krazysh0t
AS MANY AS the idiots we elect think it will take to stop the war.
WHAT is your solution to reign in militant Islam.
HOW do you propose to stop their REVENGE?
It must be IMMEDIATE or the A-10s will keep flying...
No, they are just trying to reform the US into a theocracy
No, it isn't valid at all. People are people, they will do what they feel is right
First off, ISIS isn't the Middle East. They are JUST in Syria and Iraq. Second off, the Middle East is pretty much all third world, including two destabilized countries. Of course it isn't all peaches and rainbows. How is Somalia doing? Care to vacation there any time soon? Giving examples of third world danger doesn't equate to first world danger.
Well I think that the media is always lying, but I do believe that terrorism exists and it happens (mostly in the Middle East). What I DON'T agree with is the jump in logic that because all this crap is going down in the ME, that means the 1st world is in danger of Muslims, because THAT logic doesn't gel.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Krazysh0t
They are not innocent if they follow the koran and support the religion that calls for killing.
Spiritually they that follow that book are all on the same side and that is likely not the side you are on and that makes you a target to them.
Like the cartels and the drug war. THOSE guys are WAY more dangerous to America than ISIS could ever hope to be. AND they have a self-sustaining business model that makes them (boatloads of) money. ISIS gets money from donations.
Let's put our money and resources towards more domestic problems. Like the cartels and the drug war. THOSE guys are WAY more dangerous to America than ISIS could ever hope to be
AND they have a self-sustaining business model that makes them (boatloads of) money. ISIS gets money from donations.
originally posted by: FlySolo
I'd rather have a Christian theocracy and a bottle-in-front-of-me rather than a Muslim caliphate and a frontal lobotomy.
You're really not getting it. Yes, the Muslim fanatics have an inherent belief that they are 100% validated in what they do. What they feel is "right" is purely subjective depending on where you stand. I do not think what they are doing is right nor do I hold the opinions of the other 1 billion "innocents" who agree death for leaving the faith is acceptable. People are people is not a good argument.
Um ya...I know IS isn't a geographical location. Yet. I'm referring to the band of idiots who call themselves that.
The fighting going on there among themselves doesn't equate to 1st world danger but it is still ethnic cleansing.
It has just begun.