posted on Feb, 5 2015 @ 04:23 AM
my original motivation to start the last set of posts was the papal endorsement of a book of some interpretation of the end times. There, as the links
tell us, we could see an European leader playing the role of second Napoleon and the antichrist, who is also a mortal enemy of the Rome church. Well
that might be the case in some future, but let also remember the Medieval fears of a Caliphate who plays that role. Or more modern interpretation of a
Hitler-like antichrist who exterminates the Jews. I mean, the pope can endorse whatever he likes as a person, but that cannot be automatically applied
to the beliefs of, highly conservative circles in the Catholic church, who are already boosted by "apparitions of all sort" to expect a sooner
apocalypse and second coming.
Instead, the near future of planet earth could see different scenarios. And that should be made known to people. A nuclear burned planet is different
scenario from the Apocalypse, and will postpone it for decades or centuries due to obvious reasons. Similarly, impact winter or whatever other
The positive scenarios that exclude antichrist here and now, are for example pubic contact with those Angels ET who bring new tech and travel means to
go to other planets. Still the Gospel is not spread throughout the galaxy. If we say the job is done with reaching the shores of China and Peru, then
where is Jesus???
I hope the inteligent reader understands all that, although his views might be completely different from mine. Armageddon now is not the only option
in God's hands. Whether it will be given now, or after some 50 thousand years more, it is not we who determine or know. The prophecy will be all
correct in any scenario chosen by God. Or enhanced by the people's free will. Because it differs when we speak of partial nuclear war (John 23 secret
diary) or a total annihilation (Fatima Neues Europa text, Akita). In the first case we will need Et helpers to clean up, as John 23 saw in his own
private visions according to that diary. In the second case, we would need to leave the planet (or going deep underground) to survive as human race
the nuclear winter. Both of them are not the end times predicted by Daniel. For whoever has ears let him understand. Because many are those who out of
ill understood belief and fanaticism wil actually contribute to the plans of Nero to erase Christianity. Was he not an antichrist, when supposedly
John wrote his story?