It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: DrJunk
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: DrJunk
The likelihood that you will shoot yourself or a member of your family with a gun is greater than the likelihood of your saving them from a criminal.
Since I have no intention of committing suicide, a criminal act or cleaning my firearms while loaded (the leading causes in your link) I think the likelihood is that I will not be injured by my own weapons.
And yet, the likelihood that you will is still greater than the likelihood that you will save your family from a criminal.
Rectal extraction of false probability argument to justify limiting how one can protect oneself.
It is 100x more likely you'll be killed in a car accident than murdered by a gun. Should we ban cars?
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
This is a very stupid statistic to argue about.
originally posted by: DrJunk
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: DrJunk
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: DrJunk
The likelihood that you will shoot yourself or a member of your family with a gun is greater than the likelihood of your saving them from a criminal.
Since I have no intention of committing suicide, a criminal act or cleaning my firearms while loaded (the leading causes in your link) I think the likelihood is that I will not be injured by my own weapons.
And yet, the likelihood that you will is still greater than the likelihood that you will save your family from a criminal.
Rectal extraction of false probability argument to justify limiting how one can protect oneself.
It is 100x more likely you'll be killed in a car accident than murdered by a gun. Should we ban cars?
Please cite your source, as I have cited mine, or your claim means nothing.
originally posted by: DrJunk
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
This is a very stupid statistic to argue about.
I agree. It is a very cut and dried piece of computing that speaks for itself, yet people will not heed it's advice and drop their precious guns because they need them to protect themselves from people that less likely to kill them than they are.
originally posted by: Jamie1
1,2400,000 deaths by car per year. How many are killed by guns? Shall we outlaw cars now?
originally posted by: DrJunk
originally posted by: Jamie1
1,2400,000 deaths by car per year. How many are killed by guns? Shall we outlaw cars now?
From your own source:
36,116 road fatalities in the United States in 2012.
Now for gun deaths:
32,163 gun fatalities in the United States in 2011.
www.gunpolicy.org...
If the current trend continues, guns will overtake cars in 2015.
originally posted by: DrJunk
a reply to: Jamie1
Keep reaching. You make less sense with each post.
originally posted by: th2356
a reply to: Eunuchorn
Of course I will continue voting. I don't live in the US, I live in Norway, so my vote actually counts for something.
And we do very good here without arming ourselves to go to the store, thanks. We don't live in constant fear like so many Americans seem to do.
originally posted by: th2356
a reply to: Jamie1
Don't worry about us, we're doing just fine without an armed and paranoid population. Two gun related homicides in total in 2013, one of them was a hunting accident.
You can look at the murder stats for 2013 here, try Google translate:
www.politi.no...
originally posted by: Jamie1
I've visited Norway many times and love it.
Maybe you should visit the U.S. before making racist comments about the entire population.