"American is now a curse word"

originally posted by: intrptr
Don't let me hear you complain about the Russians aiding anyone in the path of the US military steam roller.

Don't let me hear you complain about the right of self determination in Syria by the rebels.

See how that works?

a reply to: sosobad

The exact same argument can be applied to those defending Russia.

a reply to: Xcathdra

In any case, Iran has little need for enrichment. They only have one power reactor, and Russians are willing to supply plenty of fuel.

They have spent an enormous amount of capital, financial and political, for enrichment. If it's only for power, it makes no sense, since other countries would certainly sell power-grade fuel for reactors. Iran fuzzes when it talks about "nuclear technologies".

originally posted by: intrptr
Thanks for the carpet bomb of replies, have a nice day.

You and others took the time to read and respond to my posts. Why would I not give the courtesy of a response?

a reply to: mbkennel

A most, a fast neutron reactor would require about 20% enriched uranium. US Naval Vessels have reactors that use approximately 50% HEU (Highly Enriched Uranium). The only reason to go above 50% enrichment would be for weapons research.

Although, one could argue that enrichment percentages of 85-90% COULD be use for research, such as criticality experiments. But such experiments would undeniably be of the "how to weaponize" variety.

a reply to: BornAgainAlien

P.S. There was a point when the US minded its own business, but that's also when ww1 and ww2 broke out. Funny how that works out.

a reply to: BornAgainAlien

Any chance you will follow the site T and C and use the title the source has instead of your opinion?

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: sosobad

The exact same argument can be applied to those defending Russia.

So you haven't watched the podcast then. The subject matter is America bullying the world and because he posted it bornagainalien has been accused by an American poster of first being a Russian agent or being attracted to Putin, do you see what went on?

originally posted by: sosobad

originally posted by: Xcathdra

a reply to: sosobad



The exact same argument can be applied to those defending Russia.

So you haven't watched the podcast then. The subject matter is America bullying the world and because he posted it bornagainalien has been accused by an American poster of first being a Russian agent or being attracted to Putin, do you see what went on?

Bullying? Tell me what do you think would happen around the world if the US adopted a isolationism policy?

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
a reply to: BornAgainAlien

P.S. There was a point when the US minded its own business, but that's also when ww1 and ww2 broke out. Funny how that works out.

Oh my god you did not just say that... America is what 238 years old, what on earth did the human species do before that? What did we do without the US? Also to add some would say that since America was formed we have the most violent time period for our species, would that be down to the fact that since it's formation America has constantly been at war in some shape or form? I would hazard a guess, yes.

a reply to: Ancient Champion

For one, South Korea would cease to exist.

The Senkaku islands would fall into China's hands, and it's doubtful they would stop there. I'm almost certain Japan would become occupied by Chinese forces.

The middle-east may calm down momentarily, but without the threat of US intervention, rampant radicalism would soon bathe the region in blood.

And Russia would work fast to establish it's old borders under the USSR.

American manufacturing would move back home, so that would be a boon to the US.

I personally don't want the US to be isolated. Living in Japan, I really don't want to learn to speak Chinese. I'm still not great at Japanese.

a reply to: Ancient Champion

How does saying he fancies Putin or is a Russian agent help the conversation?

a reply to: sosobad

I didn't know you were alive 400 or 500 years ago. Reading about a war in a book and living thru one are very much different.

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: Ancient Champion



How does saying he fancies Putin or is a Russian agent help the conversation?

What is one suppose to think after all the Pro-Russian threads he creates?

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
a reply to: sosobad

I didn't know you were alive 400 or 500 years ago. Reading about a war in a book and living thru one are very much different.

We're you alive during ww1? I don't think so. So by your reasoning you should have mentioned it. I told you once already I can't stop from being an idiot but I can point it out

originally posted by: Ancient Champion

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: Ancient Champion



How does saying he fancies Putin or is a Russian agent help the conversation?

What is one suppose to think after all the Pro-Russian threads he creates?

Act mature maybe?

a reply to: Ancient Champion

You can think whatever you want to think, and of course you're free to post whatever you wish to post, within the T&C of ATS. That won't stop people from posting their own opinions on the matter. Or refute yours.

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: Ancient Champion



You can think whatever you want to think, and of course you're free to post whatever you wish to post, within the T&C of ATS. That won't stop people from posting their own opinions on the matter. Or refute yours.

I didn't ask him to stop posting. I asked him if he was a Russian agent. You guys are so sensitive.

a reply to: Ancient Champion

And asking that is (in my opinion) an immature question. It adds nothing to the discussion and only serves to derail the topic. I never said you weren't allowed to ask such questions, but simply to be prepared to deal with the consequences of your words.

originally posted by: sosobad

originally posted by: Ancient Champion

a reply to: sosobad



I didn't know you were alive 400 or 500 years ago. Reading about a war in a book and living thru one are very much different.

We're you alive during ww1? I don't think so. So by your reasoning you should have mentioned it. I told you once already I can't stop from being an idiot but I can point it out

Apparently my post went over your head. You said " some would say that since America was formed we have the most violent time period for our species" I was trying to get you to understand that wars 400 or 500 years ago were just as violent as today.