It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google is attempting to develop a pill that would send microscopic particles into the bloodstream in an effort to identify cancers, imminent heart attacks, and other diseases.
Andrew Conrad, the head of life sciences inside the company’s Google X research lab, revealed the project on Tuesday morning at a conference here in Southern California. According to Conrad, the company is fashioning nanoparticles—particles about one billionth of a meter in width—that combine a magnetic material with antibodies or proteins that can attach to and detect other molecules inside the body. The idea is that patients will swallow a pill that contains these particles, and after they enter the bloodstream—attempting to identify molecules that would indicate certain health problems—a wearable device could use their magnetic cores to gather them back together and read what they’ve found.
Known as the “Nanoparticle Platform,” the project is part of a wider effort inside Google to develop new technologies capable of improving healthcare. “Google X’s job is to take on big problems, to try to find clever solutions to big problems, and one of the problems we decided to tackle was healthcare,” Conrad said. “The way in which we envision doing this is inverting the paradigm in medicine—which is currently reactive and episodic—to a new paradigm that is proactive and cumulative.” As Conrad put it, this involves building “gizmos” that can monitor your health in new ways.
originally posted by: muse7
Many people have an ingrained pathological fear of technological advancements, instantly labeling such technology as the 'mark of the beast!" as has already been posted before me.
That's sad because I feel that this way of thinking might hold humanity back from reaching it's fullest potential.
originally posted by: muse7
Many people have an ingrained pathological fear of technological advancements, instantly labeling such technology as the 'mark of the beast!" as has already been posted before me.
That's sad because I feel that this way of thinking might hold humanity back from reaching it's fullest potential.
originally posted by: eisegesis
If Earth was my body, Google would certainly be a cancer.
Go back to making search engines please.
originally posted by: Cuervo
originally posted by: eisegesis
If Earth was my body, Google would certainly be a cancer.
Go back to making search engines please.
Keeping with the theme of your analogy, the cancer in Earth is the collective of people who destroy it for personal gain. Google on Earth works very much like the Google pill will work in the body; it simply documents the cancer, both on Earth and in your body.
originally posted by: eisegesis
originally posted by: Cuervo
originally posted by: eisegesis
If Earth was my body, Google would certainly be a cancer.
Go back to making search engines please.
Keeping with the theme of your analogy, the cancer in Earth is the collective of people who destroy it for personal gain. Google on Earth works very much like the Google pill will work in the body; it simply documents the cancer, both on Earth and in your body.
Will the results of my body search incarcerate me inasmuch as a real world Google search might?
originally posted by: Cuervo
originally posted by: eisegesis
originally posted by: Cuervo
originally posted by: eisegesis
If Earth was my body, Google would certainly be a cancer.
Go back to making search engines please.
Keeping with the theme of your analogy, the cancer in Earth is the collective of people who destroy it for personal gain. Google on Earth works very much like the Google pill will work in the body; it simply documents the cancer, both on Earth and in your body.
Will the results of my body search incarcerate me inasmuch as a real world Google search might?
If a Google search is enough to incarcerate you, that is not Google's fault. It doesn't provide the information that would incarcerate you; only you can produce that.
originally posted by: eisegesis
originally posted by: Cuervo
originally posted by: eisegesis
originally posted by: Cuervo
originally posted by: eisegesis
If Earth was my body, Google would certainly be a cancer.
Go back to making search engines please.
Keeping with the theme of your analogy, the cancer in Earth is the collective of people who destroy it for personal gain. Google on Earth works very much like the Google pill will work in the body; it simply documents the cancer, both on Earth and in your body.
Will the results of my body search incarcerate me inasmuch as a real world Google search might?
If a Google search is enough to incarcerate you, that is not Google's fault. It doesn't provide the information that would incarcerate you; only you can produce that.
That may be true on the surface. But the search history of a user can labeled as evidence. If evidence can convict an individual, then a hung jury can certainly be swayed with the content of a Google search, even if the user never had clicked on any links after viewing the results of the search.