It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
THE
TRUTH
ABOUT
LIES
Imagine that a superintelligence from another galaxy, whom we shall call the Predictor, comes to Earth and at once sets about playing a strange and incomprehensible game.
In this game, the superintelligent Predictor selects a human being, then offers this human being two boxes. The first box, box A, is transparent and contains a thousand dollars. The second box, box B, is opaque and contains either a million dollars or nothing. You may take only box B, or you may take boxes A and B.
But there’s a twist: If the superintelligent Predictor thinks that you’ll take both boxes, the Predictor has left box B empty; and you will receive only a thousand dollars. If the Predictor thinks that you’ll take only box B, then It has placed a million dollars in box B. Before you make your choice, the Predictor has already moved on to Its next game; there is no possible way for the contents of box B to change after you make your decision. If you like, imagine that box B has no back, so that your friend can look inside box B, though she can’t signal you in any way. Either your friend sees that box B already contains a million dollars, or she sees that it already contains nothing.
Imagine that you have watched the Predictor play a thousand such games, against people like you, some of whom two-boxed and some of whom one-boxed, and on each and every occasion the Predictor has predicted
accurately. Do you take both boxes, or only box B?
Timeless decision theory (TDT) is a decision theory, developed by Eliezer Yudkowskywhich, in slogan form, says that agents should decide as if they are determining the output of the abstract computation that they implement. This theory was developed in response to the view that rationality should be about winning (that is, about agents achieving their desired ends) rather than about behaving in a manner that we would intuitively label as rational.
originally posted by: Bluesma
I gave up on truth long ago. At least in any universal sense. There is only what we perceive and that is constantly changing.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
That which is perceived is constantly changing but does the perceiver ever change? Maybe it is the perceiver which never changes (all seeing, all knowing and ever present awareness). 'That' which never changes could be seen as the 'truth' - as it is always the same.
The 'truth' could also be that the perceiver and the perceived are not two - not separate 'things'.
Rarely does one articulate events in real-time, save for perhaps a sportscaster with the breath of an auctioneer. Every commentary of events is in past-tense, being that the event always precedes its commentary. Whenever present-tense is present, it is fiction. Truth never has nor ever will exist in real time, and never beyond the fathom-lines of both deep and shallow minds.
Any surviving organism is unique in abstracting and holding its self-identity as experiencing and processing different individual events of a concrete nature. The organism that can survive maintains its self-identity as abstracting its own durability as a class property out of those different individual events to be met and processed. Rather, the organism has the internal propensity of making its own actualization durable while processing the material resources available that are individually distinguishable. Biology is distinctive as compared to physics in availing itself of the synthesis of organization with use of the material act of measurement as a form of abstraction.
1_ if you were able to "correct" the thinking and behaviors of the people you interact with/speak to/population at large, would you continue to be a misanthrope? or, in other words, do you have some particular objective in mind... or are you simply a perpetually dissatisfied neurotic? (not intended as an insult: I am a grumpy people-hater whom has given up altogether on trying to lift others into good thinking. 😠💑😠)
2_ being that a person's (or any particular object's) identity relies on the stringing along in temporal sequence of "truths" (by your definition, some phenomena in the present moment), is that identity true (being comprised of sequential truths) or fabrication (because its persistence occurs only in past and future tenses)?
on a side note, I have been doing some reading on the theoretical foundations for the "super-intelligent supercomputer at the end of time" version of the singularity. you would probably enjoy it.
I gave up on truth long ago. At least in any universal sense. There is only what we perceive and that is constantly changing.
Words can only describe what is not actually happening, words cannot speak of 'what is'. As stated above 'Truth never has nor ever will exist in time' - time is the lie. Here and now is a fact - is it not? Children have to be taught about time - they have absolutely no 'concept' of time. 'This that is' (present tense) is non conceptual as it cannot be conceptualized - no word can be spoken to describe it. A painter may try to capture 'a moment' to freeze frame the ever changing scene.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Bluesma
I gave up on truth long ago. At least in any universal sense. There is only what we perceive and that is constantly changing.
Give truth another chance, dear Bluesma. Truth-making may perhaps be the highest form of craftsmanship. It is true that one might stop looking for it, but one should never stop creating and sculpting it, if not for our own benefit, at least for the benefit of those who might come across it.
The reading of these words happen here and now.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
“Here and now” is indeed a notion of hindsight.
All expression happens presently. Even the thought of 'there and then' happen presently. Thought cannot happen any 'other' time.
Green monkey’s, for instance, have different calls pertaining to different predators. Our expression is in the world, from the world and about the world in real time.
“Here and now” is not a fact, for “here and now” for you is “there and then” for me. Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately, we do not occupy the same place at the same time.
originally posted by: Bluesma
Why call it "truth"? I prefer to say, "This is what I perceive..." , "this is what I think right now...." this more accurately communicates that I am leaving room for further sculpting to happen!