It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
I had never heard that .Do you have a link to what you are claiming ?
If God claims to know the end from the beginning then he can put into prophecy a message we can discern it to be true after the fact and not before.
Much like prophecy but I think Chuck Messler does a good job of it imo.
Its only when you study prophecy's fulfillment can you have a reasonable degree of certainty what the future might look like .Or you can say to yourself , nothing to see here and move along .Either way it is a personal decision what you believe and how certain you are about it ....peace
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
I went and did a bit of reading how y2k came into the conversation with Chuck Missler and think that it really had nothing to do with prophecy but did have something to do with the hype that was going on at the time all around the web and such .
this is direct from his site .
"In our very first briefing pack in 1998 we said we hoped Y2K would turn out to be nothing. Our purpose was to alert people to a potentially dangerous situation and prepare them in case it turned out that way. The fact that most of the world's population was spared the negative impacts that more dire scenarios could have produced is a cause for praise and a direct answer to all of those that prayed for this very outcome. We never "predicted" or "prophesied" what was going to happen. We, carefully and clearly, stated that our suggested preparations were based on "not knowing" what would happen." www.khouse.org...
"If that was the case wouldn't such an entity make sure that the prophecies were not vague and could not be misinterpreted (as they have been countless times). "
it's not really unreasonable to think that way but that may not be the approach that God would take if He is a all knowing God . I get a kick out of the scientific papers that are put out that seem to carry much more vagueness but predict things like global warming and the like .While calming it to be absolute facts .Or news sources that seem to make things up on the fly that do not resemble the truth even a vague manner .