It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A TR3B topic on Military.com?

page: 3
23
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnonyMason
a reply to: douglas5

That pic is a big time fabrication. I forget what magazine it was for. Theres been a few other threads about those in ATS history. Its a pic of a bomber group thats been photoshopped to hell and back.

Cool looking, but totally fake.


I forgot about it till it turned up while looking through old stuff i downloaded years ago , it would take me forever to find out the truth but this site has a broad range of member's who know their stuff thankfully






posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 07:24 PM
link   
a reply to: spy66

Popular Science not Mechanics... Feb 1983.

Order your own here:
backissues.com...



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: _Del_

Nice pull!





posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: _Del_

Woah! Computer programs to do your taxes!



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 07:30 PM
link   
Black and white version of photo appeared with Cyrillic writing (that's what is blotted out in the photo) in an old Soviet publication. Can't remember which, sorry. But I knew I'd seen it before



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 07:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: _Del_
a reply to: spy66

Popular Science not Mechanics... Feb 1983.

Order your own here:
backissues.com...


That was fast



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 07:55 PM
link   
Well found _Del_.

See.....we really are 30 years ahead
. (1983-now)



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 08:00 PM
link   
a reply to: _Del_

It was interesting to see what they thought the F-117 looked like.



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I suppose in a way, the guys in the know might actually be thanking people that buy into the TR3/Aurora crap -- it makes their life easier!

If it's found on an obscure, badly coded webpage...it *must* be true!


Aurora is most certainly real!!! I have heard and felt it, along with the whole west coast of Florida so it kind of has to be real lol. Especially since that was about 8 years ago.

www.youtube.com... I have a funny feeling that this guy is telling the truth. Everything that he says fits.


Aurora...is actually the B2's name used for funding. Also there was a pilot of one of the black tris here but have since left for reasons unknown. I assume being re activated. Anyway the tr..is just prolly another funding designation or smoke screen.



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 08:17 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

TR was used as a designation for a few years when they redesignated some of the U-2s as the TR-1, but that didn't last long.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 03:57 PM
link   


No, it really isn't. There was never a program called Aurora, nor was there a mach six plus PDWE.
a reply to: Zaphod58

Yes there really is!! You know of any plane that flies faster that the space shuttle on re-entry? The Shuttle is the fastest on record publicly, besides a few rare X-plane test! The whole west coast felt it and heard it fly from the south to the north. It was much louder than the shuttle and how I know, is that they both flew directly over my house! The space shuttle never came close to shaking my sliding glass windows out of their frames. Let alone shook the ground at the same time.

I was lucky enough to be on the phone with my friend who lives north of me and I heard it before he did. Not five minutes after it flew over all the local news stations were live claiming it was not an earthquake. They had hundreds of calls in minutes from Naples to the pan handle.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

There is no project named Aurora, and there is no Mach 6+ PDE in use. Just as there is nothing that flies faster than the shuttle on reentry, unless it's another vehicle reentering. I know all about the noises heard off California, but I can say without doubt that they were NOT Aurora, and that Aurora never existed. It was a classified line item related to the B-2 when they were funding the project, NOT a high mach PDE powered, manned recon platform.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 04:12 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa




Aurora...is actually the B2's name used for funding


So they used that for a budget request even though the plane was already unveiled. You are very naive. You seriously think the CIA and the airforce is just going to give up their baby without something better?

Just look how long its been since the Blackbird was retired! The Raptor was started in 1985 and that was never intended to be a black project for long.

A super high speed stealth, nuclear capable bomber would need to be kept very quite not to ruffle the Russian feathers and send them into a panic.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

So all the hundreds of thousands of people on the west coast of Florida didn't hear anything that had them scared of a major earthquake lol?

That's mighty confident of you!

Who pays you to make such a bold statement because unless you work for Lockheed Skunkworks then you sure don't know what the hell we have?



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 04:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

I didn't say that there wasn't SOMETHING flying now did I? I said that AURORA doesn't exist, and there is no high mach PDE in use.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

Aurora was used LONG before the B-2 was ever unveiled. It was the line item budget when the program was still in the classified development stages.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 04:38 PM
link   


I didn't say that there wasn't SOMETHING flying now did I? I said that AURORA doesn't exist, and there is no high mach PDE in use.
a reply to: Zaphod58

Well unless the Russians decided to build one and test it over here then, Yeah I would say we do have a high mach plane flying and its out of testing if its being flown over Florida, or maybe they just cover a lot of ground with that bad boy.
Seems to me they did a run over Cuba for some reason.

You of all people should know I don't come here to BS anyone, I come here for news mainly but will share what I know to be fact. I know planes and I know what I heard and felt, especially when so many people and the news did as well lol.

McDill even had a cover story for the news all lined up. They blamed it on two F-18s flying over Sarasota landing at McDill AFB.

The planes were caught on video flying north over Sarasota at dusk and they were not flying fast at all and they sure as hell did not fly near my house, as I am way way north of where they landed in Tampa Bay . Never mind they would have had to fly off the deck over my house at Mach 3.5 to shake my house as bad as it did. The F-18 is lucky to fly faster than mach 2 and they had to be escorting something important because we don't have any navy bases here at all, not even one in this whole area cause the water is too shallow.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 04:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

Navy bases don't have to have water you know. That's why they're Naval Air Stations. NAS Fallon is in the Nevada desert, nowhere near water. Florida has Jacksonville and Pensacola both, and there are more up the coast, and into Alabama. They also do a lot of carrier workups in the Florida area, so that would explain any F-18s flying in the area.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 05:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

Aurora was used LONG before the B-2 was ever unveiled. It was the line item budget when the program was still in the classified development stages.


Oh my a full two years lol. The line Item also had TR-1 right beside it, that is Tactical Recon. You think the Air Force is going to admit a secret craft? All the evidence points to "we have a mach 6 aircraft" but you keep listening to our government lol. I will listen to the sky and my home shaking from a non-existent aircraft lmao.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

Navy bases don't have to have water you know. That's why they're Naval Air Stations. NAS Fallon is in the Nevada desert, nowhere near water. Florida has Jacksonville and Pensacola both, and there are more up the coast, and into Alabama. They also do a lot of carrier workups in the Florida area, so that would explain any F-18s flying in the area.


I know all about air stations goofball as I have been there, most navy air ops stay in the panhandle. Navy planes are very rare at McDill AFB or in this area period.




top topics



 
23
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join