Are the Edgar Cayce Prophecies coming true?

Hello ATS, I've been reading some Edgar Cayce prophecies and now I want to start this thread about him. Especially, since his prophecies are becoming more and more pertinent relative to the times we live in.

In Reading 1602-3, Cayce mentions that the earth changes will start manifesting in the years around 1998, and that it will be a gradual process. "In 1998 we may find a great deal of the activities as have been wrought by the gradual changes that are coming about. These are at the periods when the cycle of the solar activity, or the years as related to the sun's passage through the various spheres of activity become paramount...to the change between the Piscean and the Aquarian age. This is a gradual, not a cataclysmic activity in the experience of the Earth in this period."

Cayce also provides certain signs which will tell us that we are entering the period of earth changes. In Reading 311-8 19, when he was asked, “How soon will the changes in the earth's activity begin to be apparent?” he responded by saying, “When there is the first breaking up of some conditions in the South Sea, and those as apparent in the sinking or rising of that that's almost opposite same, or in the Mediterranean, and the Aetna area, then we may know it has begun.”

Cayce is, therefore, clearly referring to an increase in the level of seismic activity in the Pacific and Mediterranean belt, starting from the years around 1998. This is exactly what we seem to be witnessing now. In the Mediterranean regions, in addition to the recent upswing in seismic activity, there have also been significant upheavals in the political and social sphere in the countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Syria all of which are bordering the Mediterranean Sea.

Interesting.....It appears that Cayce is right on the money so far, but even more troubling is this....

Are these the prophetic signs of the impending period of earth changes that were predicted by Edgar Cayce? If so, his predictions for the future are even dire. Cayce mentions that from ’58 to ’98, major earth changes will begin take place. This possibly refers to the period from 2058 to 2098, since the period of change begins in 1998.

In Reading 3976-15, he says:

"The earth will be broken up in the western portion of America. The greater portion of Japan must go into the sea. The upper portion of Europe will be changed as in the twinkling of an eye. Land will appear off the east coast of America. There will be the upheavals in the Arctic and in the Antarctic that will make for the eruption of volcanoes in the Torrid areas, and there will be shifting then of the poles - so that where there has been those of a frigid or the semi-tropical will become the more tropical, and moss and fern will grow. And these will begin in those periods in '58 to '98, when these will be proclaimed as the periods when His light will be seen again in the clouds. As to times, as to seasons, as to places, ALONE is it given to those who have named the name - and who bear the mark of those of His calling and His election in their bodies. To them it shall be given."

So, according to Cayce these are Earth changes that are bound to happen and will happen starting in 1998 and get really intense between the years of 2058-2098! Hopefully, there will be a thriving colony on MARS by then and we can go there to avoid this Earthly turmoil. Although, I've had dreams about humans living on MARS and it wasn't necessarily good for us there either but that's another thread. I'm sure Cayce has been discussed here on ATS before, but I want to start a current discussion abut his prophecies especially we have so many new people here on ATS.

bibhudev.blogspot.com...

How does this fit in with his Atlantis predictions timewise? And the other things he was wrong about? I'm being sincere. Thanks.

Although I find Edgar Casey to be an interesting person, its common knowledge that Global Warming was being discussed during his lifetime so it's not entirely possible the concept was lost on him. In fact, the first mention of Global Warming Mr. Casey was just turning 20.

I read some of his stuff a really long time ago
he seemed to have a real gift
but I am not going with any 'doomsday' predictions
or major life/planet changes

i avoid internet 'channelings' because they never happen

originally posted by: The GUT
How does this fit in with his Atlantis predictions timewise? And the other things he was wrong about? I'm being sincere. Thanks.

In the post there is a quote from Cayce when he talks about the geologically turbulent years between 2058-2098 where he says: "Land will appear off the east coast of America......." I think this is when Atlantis is supposed to appear/ rise. As I'm sure you know there is the speculation that Atlantis may be deep in the ocean near the Bahamas where the "Bimini Road" was found.

Definitely something up with pole shift and some have made some interesting correlations between pole shift and seismic activity but wouldn't plan a one way ticket to Mars because of predictions made by Cayce, didn't he predict Armageddon in 1999!

Cayce was actually very fond of the subject of Atlantis, and made quite a few predictions about the lost city. Most of these predictions were way off base.

One of these predictions stated that an Atlantean death ray would be discovered by the U.S. in 1958. He also predicted that the lost city would rise again in 1968 or 1969. Neither one of these predictions ever came to fruition.

The Many Failed Edgar Cayce Prophecies

As Rosinitiate mentioned, certainly Cayce is a fascinating study, lostbook. Intriguing even to a certain point. I would, however, encourage you to dig deeper. Did something whisper in Cayce's ear during his "sleeps?"? Could be. If so, it either lied a lot, or is pretty untrustworthy.

Don't get me wrong, I'm pretty "out there" too. My doom porn clock says we're in for the shizzle WAY before 2058. I'll sleep on it...

I think the part about japan going into the sea is interesting...can anyone say Fukishima ?

originally posted by: glend
Definitely something up with pole shift and some have made some interesting correlations between pole shift and seismic activity but wouldn't plan a one way ticket to Mars because of predictions made by Cayce, didn't he predict Armageddon in 1999!

No. He predicted that Christ would be born in 1999.

And just so everyone knows, he was a believer in Jesus Christ too. That's why of all predictions he made, this would qualify as the most important one of them all because his faith is something he took quite seriously as a Christian.

I'm not much of a Cayce fan, but I will say, if that "death ray" was found. We would never know about it. There's no way in hell(or on earth) they're going to tell the public they found advanced technology in a city that sank more than 10,000 years ago. Which would also be a good reason to keep its existence a mystery. If it was a real place, that is.

Just my two shillings.

originally posted by: Meldionne1
I think the part about japan going into the sea is interesting...can anyone say Fukishima ?

groups trying to "make a prediction happen"
aren't really new concepts

That thought did cross my mind, Sir Klassified, but I figured hiding a rising Atlantis might stretch the theory a bit. Good to cross paths again, amigo.

Seismic activity is not increasing.

a reply to: TheProphetMark

I take it back then as I believe revelations could be playing out.

originally posted by: glend
a reply to: TheProphetMark

I take it back then as I believe revelations could be playing out.

You would be right. Trust your instincts Brother

For heavens sake.....
seriously....
The predictions of Mr Cayce seem about as vague as the quatrains of his predessessor.....
I think a prophet who may get a few spot on, but mess up a bunch as well.....would hardly be a Godsend....(real one)
There are some stories about his medical diagnoses that lead me to believe he may have been remote viewing.....
If the stories are to be believed....

a reply to: lostbook

He refers to sun cycles beginning in 98... Problem is the sun has been pretty quiet overall since then. Probably why global warming became climate change, since warming pretty much stopped around 98.

While I find Cayce interesting, I do not believe he is the real deal...

a reply to: lostbook

I believe in cayce prophecies
I just think he is more of "long term" prophet

when people discuss Cayce or anyone else who 'see's' just once i'd like it to be acknowledged what they see happening is just a window or possibility. What's seen as potentially happening is dependent on so many other factors that may or may not fall into line.

yes it's their best effort
no they have no control over the millions of other things that may or not affect the outcome.

personally i think of it as about a three month window of accuracy. after that too many things could have happened either way. people like Cayce should be lauded for their efforts. all gifts have limitations. to expect more is a little
unrealistic.

a reply to: lostbook

Cayce is, therefore, clearly referring to an increase in the level of seismic activity in the Pacific and Mediterranean belt, starting from the years around 1998. This is exactly what we seem to be witnessing now.

Actually, it is not. I posted this in another thread recently:

We continue to be asked by many people throughout the world if earthquakes are on the increase. Although it may seem that we are having more earthquakes, earthquakes of magnitude 7.0 or greater have remained fairly constant.

A partial explanation may lie in the fact that in the last twenty years, we have definitely had an increase in the number of earthquakes we have been able to locate each year. This is because of the tremendous increase in the number of seismograph stations in the world and the many improvements in global communications. (Source)

Better technology, better reporting, not more earthquakes.