It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tsingtao
originally posted by: buster2010
The Founding Fathers would be so proud. No we will not make any laws respecting the establishment of religion but we will sure change laws to suit them. Score one for the biblethumpers who want to force their religious dogma on others.
hey buster, who was forcing who, again?
what happened to freedom of religion?
Hobby Lobby is not a non profit religious corporation. Because if it were then the owner couldn't have become a billionaire if it was non profit now could he?
The doctrine does not hold that corporations are flesh and blood "people" apart from their shareholders, executives, and managers, nor does it grant to corporations all of the rights of citizens.
Remember the bible says it's ok to have slaves so all I will have to say is it's my faith.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: buster2010
Hobby Lobby is not a non profit religious corporation. Because if it were then the owner couldn't have become a billionaire if it was non profit now could he?
Everything changed yesterday.
Hobby Lobby.
Hobby Lobby.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: buster2010
Remember the bible says it's ok to have slaves so all I will have to say is it's my faith.
Slavery is illegal and that law would supersede any claim otherwise.
They found that, in the case of the four methods seen as abortifacients, the HHH regulation violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a law passed by Congress. Since the regulation didn't follow the law, it was void.
originally posted by: OrphanApology
a reply to: buster2010
Hey there is one thing I will say, which is that ever since discovering the internets and it's power... I haven't shopped at hobby lobby anyway.
I refuse to pay 10 bucks for a paintbrush. I refuse.
You're absolutely right. If they had said that any form of contraception violated RFRA, I would have gone "What the Hell-ing" all over the place.
SCOTUS didn't rule that those methods of contraception violated the RFRA.
Not so much just the Hahns and Greens. HHS included in their brief to the Court an FDA booklet entitled "Birth Control: Medicines to Help You." (Bottom of page 8, top of page 9) HHS, thought they were abortifacients, and since everybody agreed, the Court went along with them.
SCOTUS didn't consider the 4 methods of birth control to be abortifacients, the Hahns and the Greens did.
Now THAT is an EXCELLENT point. Of course there were a few other tests and hurdles, but you're right. HHS can't tell them that they're religious beliefs are silly and not protected.
The court ruled that their belief that these things violated the Hahn's and the Greens religious liberties was all that mattered.
Right again. They thought that they shouldn't be forced to pay for those particular methods of birth control.
So, don't like birth control, don't take birth control right? Not good enough for the Hahns and the Greens.
I'm not so sure. The Green's never expressed a desire to prevent their employees from doing anything. They just objected to being forced to pay for it. I don't mind if you get drunk, but I don't want the cops telling me I have to buy the booze.
The Court ruled that the Hahn's and the Green's perceived religious need to prevent their employees from possibly doing something they felt was immoral, and their desire to dis-allowing the options, through their insurance packages, was urgent and compelling enough for the court to grant them the exemption.
No one in the case thought any particular method of contraception impacted Hobby Lobby's rights. This was about the mandate to pay for things recognized by the government and Hobby Lobby to be abortifacients.
The court ruled on belief, not on how any particular contraception method actually impacted their rights.
Absolutely right. This particular point, more than any other (in my opinion) doomed HHS.
Also, it seems to me that SCOTUS relieved Hobby Lobby of the mandate because the gov already has religious exemptions in place, and a recourse for disenfranchised employees of those exempted businesses.
Interestingly enough, the Court would have allowed the government to win even if they had a lesser interest than Hobby Lobby's. Where HHS failed was that they didn't show they had used the "Least restrictive" method to attain that interest. That's where they violated RFRA, and that's where the Court struck a stake through their hearts.
The Gov, therefore, failed to show that their interest in enforcing the law through Hobby Lobby, et al, wasn't greater than the corporations' rights to religious liberty and expression.
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
Allowing businesses to not pay for contraceptives and certain procedures based on their religious beliefs is bass ackwards.
I'm not so sure. The Green's never expressed a desire to prevent their employees from doing anything. They just objected to being forced to pay for it. I don't mind if you get drunk, but I don't want the cops telling me I have to buy the booze.
They had no desire to disallow any options and the Court didn't think they did. That wasn't a reason for the Court's decision. There was nothing urgent and compelling about anything (at least not as a decisive factor).
The belief of the Hahns and Greens implicates a difficult and important question of religion and moral philosophy, namely, the circumstances under which it is immoral for a person to perform an act that is innocent in itself but that has the effect of enabling or facilitating the commission of an immoral act by another. It is not for the Court to say that the religious beliefs of the plaintiffs are mistaken or unreasonable.
Interestingly enough, the Court would have allowed the government to win even if they had a lesser interest than Hobby Lobby's. Where HHS failed was that they didn't show they had used the "Least restrictive" method to attain that interest. That's where they violated RFRA, and that's where the Court struck a stake through their hearts.
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
Its pushing religious beliefs on your employees by saying that because your the owner and feel its wrong and against your views you do not need to pay for it for your employees.
How about you give a damn for your employees; Hobby Lobby. How about you follow the laws. Quit making a big stink about it and do something for your minimum wage slaves.
Stupidest comment of the day. Hobby Lobby is not saving any money whatsoever, they already insure employees and cover 16 different birth control methods. They save 0.
What a crock of horse hockey that is. A giant penny pinching scheme because of the cost of the ACA on businesses.
The richer they are the more greedy they become.