It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LightningStrikesHere
Part of it is finding truth ! By fact! A lot of Muslims disagree with salafi because they question the authenticity of certain hadith ect ect .
Its hard to explain.
Let's see if can give you an example .
We have two ponds of knowlwge the names are Quran and Muhammad . well Quran and Mohammed gave clear instructions on how to drink from them to gain knowledge. Part of that instruction was to stay on the strait path to the pond of knowledge . but over the years people started to deviate from the strait path and forge their own path. This causesed many pathways to open up to the ponds of knowledge .
So much so that the original path became hard to see and fallow.... You say what's wrong with new paths being formed to ponds of knowledge?
Well, if people would have stayed on the strait path like Quran & Muhammad explained they would have found that on the way to the ponds of knowledge was more instruction on how to understand the knowledge of what they drink from. ... So to be salafi is to be on the straight path and restore it along the way..
Hope this makes sense ..
TextDo you think you will be loved by the rising of the last caliphate? Where ever you are do you feel that the danger of violence will rise in your area? Do you feel that after estiblished they will find peace?
originally posted by: undo
lightning strikes here:
ilah is enlil.
enlil (en means lord)
lil (of the air)
it is not, however,
iah. iah is enki (en means lord and ki means of the clay/soil/earth from which he formed the adam)
enki was ea, pronounced
add semitic prefix
h-ayah who is yah-weh
both names derive from sumerian gods, enlil and enki. for some reason, enlil and enki (ea) were melded into one god, later in the timeline, so you see the addition of "ah" to enlil's name, ilah. yet sumerian texts reveal they were two different gods. some moments in biblical texts are enlil's doing and some are enki's doing.
for example, enlil decreed the flood. enki warned the noah figure about it and gave him instructions how to build an ark. enki created the adam males and females and gave them procreation and enlil demanded their dna be nerfed because he didn't want the adam procreating all over the universe, as would likely happen since they still retained their original eternally regenerating dna. enki confused the languages at babel to thwart enlil's world order.
they've been struggling over the fate of humans since the beginning
The Shahada (Arabic: الشهادة aš-šahādah audio , from the verb شهد šahida, "to witness" or "to testify") or Kalimat ash-Shahādah (Arabic: كلمة الشهادة) is an Islamic creed declaring belief in the oneness of God and the acceptance of Muhammad as God's prophet. The declaration, in its shortest form, reads:
لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا الله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ الله
lā ʾilāha ʾil ʾāllāh, muḥammadun rasūlu-llāh
"There is no god but God, Muhammad is the messenger of God."
originally posted by: undo
a reply to: LightningStrikesHere
i'll explain. you said allah is ilah, correct? and you are right.
en.lil was lord of the air.
remove the lord prefix
for example the tower of babel was originally the tower of babilu, a form of el (see the ilu, that's enlil)
ilah contains the names of both enlil and enki (ea/ayah).
one was the creator god, who created humans, gave them procreation, warned them about the flood, gave instructions on how to build the ark, and saved them from enlil's one world order.
the other was the god of this world, who because of divine laws, decided if humans were going to be procreators their eternally repairing dna be nerfed. this is the scene in the garden.
so does that mean enlil is more powerful than enki.
no. it was a matter of divine law regarding planets.
enki was the creator god. enlil was the political god.
they were both gods and sons of god, who was anu, the heavenly father, the amen.
enlil started demanding blood sacrifices. have you read the sumerian texts by chance?
Ali ibn Abi Talib also said concerning the Kharijites: Do not fight the Kharijites after me, because one who seeks right but does not find it, is not like one who seeks wrong and finds it.
As-Sayyid ar-Radi says: (By “one who seeks wrong and finds it”) Amir al-mu'minin means Mu`awiyah and his men.
" I have come to know that every one of them entered upon Muslim women and other women under protection of Islam (Christians and Jews) and took away their ornaments from legs, arms, necks and ears and no woman could resist it except by pronouncing the verse, "We are for Allah and to Him we shall return." (Qur'an, 2 :156) Then they got back laden with wealth without any wound or loss of life. If any Muslim dies of grief after all this he is not to be blamed but rather there is justification for him before me. How strange! How strange! By Allah my heart sinks to see the unity of these people on their wrong and your dispersion from your right. Woe and grief befall you. You have become the target at which arrows are shot. You are being killed and you do not kill. You are being attacked but you do not attack. Allah is being disobeyed and you remain agreeable to it "
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: maes2
Although... they wont fight ISIS... But I seriously doubt they had Imam Ali (as) in mind as to their reason not to fight...And I seriously doubt that Imam Ali (as) thought we should just allow ourselves to get overtaken and murdered by these self professed "Muslims"
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: nenothtu You claim you have no right to say what path someone should take but i say you are getting sort. ILet's just say that the path one could take requires the blood of you and everyone you love before they complete their requirments. That would be a path that involves you and you should be concerned at that point with what your neighbor is up to. Basically the path that you want people to have the freedom and choice to be on should not exist at the expense of the saftey of the world? If someone started worshipping gun powder as their god then people should worry. if that god then ask for blood of the infedals then we should get involved. One should always be careful when trying to understanding a religion that is being used to outright kill folks. They can take a soft heart and turn it hard as death.