It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The goal was established by the Club of Rome whose member, Maurice Strong transmitted and translated it into world government policy through the United Nations.
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. the threat of global warming.. would fit the bill…. the real enemy, then, is humanity itself….we believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or….one invented for the purpose.” — Club of Rome
He was assisted by politicians like Al Gore and Tim Wirth. In 1993 the latter did not hide the naked political objective.
“We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing …”
They were aided by national weather agencies and bureaucratic scientists with similar political persuasions appointed to the IPCC.
He co-authored the ‘Earth Charter’ with Mikhail Gorbachev in 1992. It was Gorbachev who stated in 1996 that the “threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.”
On May 6, the Administration released the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment, the most authoritative and comprehensive source of scientific information to date about climate-change impacts across all U.S. regions and on critical sectors of the economy.
The report, a key deliverable of President Obama's Climate Action Plan, confirms that climate change is not a distant threat — it's affecting us now.
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
The issue here is misdirection.
For starters, we need only look back in history to see there was massive changes to our climate (more than once) Therefore, the focus and investment shouldn't be in changing our bad habits it should be on survival at this point. Trying to "fix" what we broke and what we think we broke at this point is throwing good money after bad. I'm not saying we shouldn't change our ways but we really shouldn't be just now trying to learn to pee in the potty while a cherry bomb sits lit within.
It's not like we are just learning about the things we did and think we did to our climate. We've known a LONG time about pollution and we didn't care, we just decided to kick the problem down the road to our children. Great job there, and thank you for that. (myself included).
We need to understand what could happen and will likely happen. Historical records is a good start and find the most extreme situation, whether globally arid or a worldwide tundra and PREPARE to exist in such conditions without having to sacrifice millions or billions just to protect rich peoples investments.
originally posted by: Dianec
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
The issue here is misdirection.
For starters, we need only look back in history to see there was massive changes to our climate (more than once) Therefore, the focus and investment shouldn't be in changing our bad habits it should be on survival at this point. Trying to "fix" what we broke and what we think we broke at this point is throwing good money after bad. I'm not saying we shouldn't change our ways but we really shouldn't be just now trying to learn to pee in the potty while a cherry bomb sits lit within.
It's not like we are just learning about the things we did and think we did to our climate. We've known a LONG time about pollution and we didn't care, we just decided to kick the problem down the road to our children. Great job there, and thank you for that. (myself included).
We need to understand what could happen and will likely happen. Historical records is a good start and find the most extreme situation, whether globally arid or a worldwide tundra and PREPARE to exist in such conditions without having to sacrifice millions or billions just to protect rich peoples investments.
If our government wants to make this an issue at last they need to be prepared to deal with the damage done in a manner equal or greater to the prevention strategies of one Country.
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
originally posted by: Dianec
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
The issue here is misdirection.
For starters, we need only look back in history to see there was massive changes to our climate (more than once) Therefore, the focus and investment shouldn't be in changing our bad habits it should be on survival at this point. Trying to "fix" what we broke and what we think we broke at this point is throwing good money after bad. I'm not saying we shouldn't change our ways but we really shouldn't be just now trying to learn to pee in the potty while a cherry bomb sits lit within.
It's not like we are just learning about the things we did and think we did to our climate. We've known a LONG time about pollution and we didn't care, we just decided to kick the problem down the road to our children. Great job there, and thank you for that. (myself included).
We need to understand what could happen and will likely happen. Historical records is a good start and find the most extreme situation, whether globally arid or a worldwide tundra and PREPARE to exist in such conditions without having to sacrifice millions or billions just to protect rich peoples investments.
If our government wants to make this an issue at last they need to be prepared to deal with the damage done in a manner equal or greater to the prevention strategies of one Country.
If you or ANYONE is looking to government to find a solution to this problem, you might as well bend over and kiss your ass goodbye. You (we) will be up the proverbial (and literal) creek with no means of propulsion.
There only solution will be to tax you, that I can promise. 99% of that money will go into projects that protect themselves and their investments. In the end, while they are sitting in whatever bug out shelter they have, they will simply say sorry we tried but thanks for your vote.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
Follow the money.
No fear = no Grant money = no cushy job with lab assistants doing all the work and a six figure income.
1970's phony coming Ice Age doom porn all over again, brought to us by the same people. Boy are we dumb.
a reply to: Glinda
I wonder how Al and the other telegenic "experts" arrived at DC? Pony Express? - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
In that report they say sea level could rise 8 inches, 11 inches, 4 feet, or 6.6 feet by the year 2100.
[ glad to see some solid projections with minimal guesswork ]