It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
neoholographicOf course the statement some winter nights reach below zero in Detroit can be falsified.
All you have to do is check the winter nights in Detroit and if you don't find a night that was below zero than the statement is falsified.
Of course the statement some winter nights reach below zero in Detroit can be falsified.
All you have to do is check the winter nights in Detroit and if you don't find a night that was below zero than the statement is falsified.
What your [ you're] saying has nothing to do with science.
You've now gone from hypothesis to theory. You know the difference, right?
You don't have to show that a universe doesn't exist in order to falsify the theory. You just have to show that multiverse theories don't agree with observation.
No. You said "some winter nights."
All you have to do is check the winter nights in Detroit and if you don't find a night that was below zero than the statement is falsified.
The statement some winter nights reach below zero can be falsified if you check the winter nights in Detroit and you don't find any winter nights below zero.
Theories and hypothesis can be falsified. Now you're trying to play semantics because you can't debate the issue.
No. You can't. You may be able to falsify a particular parts of a theory about multiple universes by testing predictions made by it but you cannot show that another universe does not exist.
Again, you don't have to show a multiverse doesn't exist in order to falsify it.
You may be able to falsify a particular parts of a theory about multiple universes by testing predictions made by it but you cannot show that another universe does not exist.
Again, you don't have to show that another universe doesn't exist to falsify multiverse theories.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU JUST SAID.
Because even though parts of the theory may be wrong, the basis (that there is more than one universe) may still be correct even though the approach was wrong. Parts of many theories have been falsified but the base idea has not. That is why and how theories are modified and continue to exist as theory. It can not be shown that there is not more than one universe. The base idea cannot be falsified.
If you falsify particular parts of a multiverse theory why do you need to show another universe doesn't exist in order to falsify it???
There's zero evidence that unicorns create rainbows.
usertwelve
reply to post by neoholographic
There's zero evidence that unicorns create rainbows.
Is there evidence that UFOs are piloted by beings not from earth?
usertwelve
reply to post by neoholographic
There's zero evidence that unicorns create rainbows.
Is there evidence that UFOs are piloted by beings not from earth?
But the hypothesis that some are ET is a worthy hypothesis and is even scientific because of the preponderance of physical evidence.
Falsifiability or refutability is the logical possibility that an assertion could be shown false by a particular observation or physical experiment. That something is "falsifiable" does not mean it is false; rather, it means that if the statement were false, then its falsehood could be demonstrated.
With the support of former White House Chief-of-Staff John Podesta, Kean draws on her research to separate fact from fiction and to lift the veil on decades of U.S. government misinformation. Throughout, she presents irrefutable evidence that unknown flying objects – metallic, luminous, and seemingly able to maneuver in ways that defy the laws of physics – actually exist.
From UFOTV®, accept no imitations. Narrated by Peter Coyote, OUT OF THE BLUE is widely considered one of the best documentary films ever made about UFOs and was directed by celebrated filmmakers James Fox, Tim Coleman and Boris Zubov. The films producers traveled around the world to investigate some of the most famous UFO events on record. Through exclusive interviews with high-ranking military and government personnel, this award-winning film supports the theory that some UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin.
This film features Governor Fife Symington, Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Russian General Leonid Aleviev, President Jimmy Carter, Cosmonaut Major General Pavel Popovich, UK Admiral Lord Hill Norton, Physics Professor Dr. Brian Greene, President Gerald Ford, Astronaut Colonel Gordon Cooper. White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, and many more. Presents an International Scope, Quality Testimony, and Scientific Perspectives. OUT OF THE BLUE provides a Definitive Investigation of the UFO Phenomenon.
Yes.
You then say you can falsify part of a theory to falsify it but that doesn't falsify the base of the theory.
No.
This is just gobbledy gook.
Correct. The existence of things cannot be falsified but their existence can be demonstrated. I cannot prove that unicorns do not exist but if I caught one it would prove that they do. Bigfoot cannot be falsified even though "evidence" has been.
Science doesn't show that things don't exist.
Yes, I said that here:
That something is "falsifiable" does not mean it is false;
www.abovetopsecret.com...
A strong hypothesis should be demonstrably possible by evidence for as well as being falsifiable but not being falsified.
No. You can falsify individual UFO cases by applying those criteria. You cannot falsify all cases, one reason being that there is usually not enough information to do so. The ETH is not falsifiable.
So you can falsify the ET hypothesis by falsifying a key component of the ET hypothesis. The key components are these.