It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well, chemicals can induce their own replication.
Viruses are rather 'life-like'.
I beleive that there are also micro-organisms that have been created in the lab that have a small 'minimal' genome.
Originally posted by Slicky1313
evolution is scientifically impossible. chances of it happening are so big u cant imagine.
Viruses are life-like but are not life. Viruses require life to propagate.
Originally posted by Flux Wilde
Question for the bible cult if evoultion doesn't happen and we all evolved from Adam and Eve how come we all look differnent for example for arguments sake lets say eve was a blonde Adam had black hair (not sure if the bible says) Where did red heads come from???
Originally posted by saint4God
Though Adam and Eve were the first, I don't believe they were the only.
Also, the human genome was built with a lot of variables both dominant and recessive.
Originally posted by Slicky1313
evolution is scientifically impossible. chances of it happening are so big u cant imagine. besides, we got as far as a hypothesis, and no farther. thats one bad theory if all we got is a hypothesis.
it can never be a science, cause its lacking like 2 out of the 3 qualities to be a science, which is to be observed for one.
Originally posted by riley
Where did the others come from? The dirt? Adams rib? [which would make them clones and therefore inbred anyway].
Also, the human genome was built with a lot of variables both dominant and recessive.
Recessive to what? A recessive gene might be one from a grandparent for instance.
Originally posted by saint4God
Unless you believe the genome 'evolves' to contain more and more information as generations continue, but that's contrary to current scientific thought.
Originally posted by riley
Originally posted by saint4God
Unless you believe the genome 'evolves' to contain more and more information as generations continue, but that's contrary to current scientific thought.
Could you provide a source that suggests this is contary to current scientific thought please? .. and why it's contrary?
Originally posted by riley
I am curious as well.. since you seem to have some respect for science.. how is dirt able to transform into human tissue?
Originally posted by saint4God
Internet searches like this could help define the finite amount of dna humans have and the components thereof: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Do you have examples of a 'proto' or previous formation of human genes?
The body contains core components also found in dirt. Carbon, water, oxides, minerals, etc. My analogy is this. If you have eggs, milk, sugar, oil and flour, you can make a cake. It takes specific quanitites, mixing and baking but looking at the cake without studying it, you'd have no idea it contained those ingredients.
And/Or this can be taken as energy, electricity or other etherial substance to set an otherwise lifeless body into motion. If you want to say there was a fusion of the stuff in dirt because of this then okay, there's an interesting thought.
Just kicking around ideas. The 'how' of it is still not known, but doesn't mean we should stop looking for answers.
Originally posted by riley
My take on it is that is would be far more easier for a single celled organism to be created from the earth than a whole animal as complex as a human being.. and it would be fairly simple for it to split to form another and become.. Eve.
Originally posted by riley
The problem with her coming from Adam's rib is that women have twice the dna.. so the opposite would make more sense.
Originally posted by Amelia
....and to beleive that crap in the bible, we have to be totally dumb.
women have twice the dna.. so the opposite would make more sense.