posted on Dec, 2 2004 @ 05:20 PM
ehhh, I dont really no if its the most scientific theory or not, and yes, there are MANY holes in it, that arent very easily explained. I once read a
saying by somone about religious scientist beliving in the Bible,or their religions, and they stated that even if they ran up against scientific
evidence that strongly supported that a part of their religion was false, they would discard it immediately and not change it.
the same is true to evolution. we dont really have much to go on for answers of an ape like creature evolving to man. where are the trillions of
fossils without having to be molded and filled in, where is the in between living, do the genetics connect, are the fossils there, considering it
would take MANY MANY monkey men to turn to men. what if the evidence did support man didnt evolve from a monkey like animal, that would contradict
their whole theory, leaving the whole thing under fire. so is not the same for evolutionist scientist also, and cratonist scientist dont nescesarily
have a religion.