It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where is it said it is impossible?
I hope not, because that is IMPOSSIBLE by JPL's own admission as well as KODAK, NASA, Astonomy.net, and every other site I have visited regarding photographing cosmic rays.
Previoulsy you denined that those were cosmic ray strikes but that image is not from STEREO A. But the point is that even a camera designed for use in space is subject to cosmic ray strikes.
The Stereo Ahead cams are set completely different than the Rovers NAV-CAMS and you darned well know it.
The whole community? Everyone? Who at JPL has said it is not a cosmic ray? Where has NASA said it is not a cosmic ray?
Again....not only am I saying it's not a cosmic ray...the WHOLE JPL community as well as NASA is claiming it as well on the news.
Kukri
I see everyone focusing on several pixels of "light" off in thedistance but nobody commenting on the marks on the surface in the foreground. Kinda reminds of " hey what caused that tra... oh look a shiny thing over there"
a diagonal sensor strike ?
Miniscuzz
reply to post by Phage
Phage...come on man...now you're just being juvenile. Are you actually claiming that a cosmic ray can actually be photographed by a camera using less than a ONE MINUTE exposure time?? I hope not, because that is IMPOSSIBLE by JPL's own admission as well as KODAK, NASA, Astonomy.net, and every other site I have visited regarding photographing cosmic rays.
You conveniently skip over information which contradicts your theory and muddy the waters by placing pictures of a Stereo Ahead capture and claim victory lol. The Stereo Ahead cams are set completely different than the Rovers NAV-CAMS and you darned well know it.
The exposure times differ by MINUTES and the bandpass filters on both are completely different. Much like trying to compare a Polaroid pic from the 70's to a 20MP digital pic from now. Apples and oranges.
Again....not only am I saying it's not a cosmic ray...the WHOLE JPL community as well as NASA is claiming it as well on the news. And yet...Phage continues pressing on in the hopes to be noticed. How utterly silly.
EDIT* This is the PDS file directly from JPL Labs which give all the technical information and software information regarding the NAV-CAMS. Anyone familiar with photography can read it and immediately see that there is ZERO possibility that Curiosity's NAV-CAMS can catch a cosmic ray in a picture.
It's a short file and can be viewed without downloading
starbrite.jpl.nasa.gov...
edit on 8-4-2014 by Miniscuzz because: (no reason given)
This sort of thing?
What is causing the "channels" in the foreground that is not wind related.
Phage
Can anyone explain why it does not appear in the image taken by the left NAVCAM at the same time?
Leftedit on 4/6/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
The cameras are about 18 inches apart.
I'm curious as to the other image of the "flash"... was it imaged with the same camera or the one on the other side of the rover?
Depending on the distance, a very tight light source. A reflection of the Sun from a small mirror (a heliograph) at a distance of half a mile is 25 feet wide.
But if external, then for it not to show in the other image taken at the same time but feet apart, then it would have to be a tightly directional light source, like a reflective mirror
Miniscuzz
This should clear it up for you Phage. It explicitly states that the shutter must be open for longer than a minute but closer to five minutes. You also must use the highest ISO setting.
i suggest you look at these images miniscuzz.
symptomoftheuniverse
This image is from sol 419,its a different camera ,rear hazcam mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
And heres one from the other cam at the same time mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
It appears we have fuzzy wuzzies flying round mars.edit on 8-4-2014 by symptomoftheuniverse because: (no reason given)
freelance_zenarchist
Miniscuzz
This should clear it up for you Phage. It explicitly states that the shutter must be open for longer than a minute but closer to five minutes. You also must use the highest ISO setting.
Which planet are those suggestions for?
No. The primary purpose is to convert photons into electrons.
Mainly that the sole purpose of the CCD cams on the Rover is to convert Protons into Electrons in order to produce a detailed image.
The LASCO cameras use visible light. The human retina does not function in the same manner as a CCD.
The NC's on the Rover use the visual light spectrum as well....meaning the odds those cams could catch a cosmic ray are about ZERO.
This should clear it up for you Phage. It explicitly states that the shutter must be open for longer than a minute but closer to five minutes. You also must use the highest ISO setting.
I haven't seen any scientists say it isn't a cosmic ray strike. Can you point me in the right direction? All I can find is Justin Maki saying they think it's a glint off of a rock or a light leak. Nothing saying it can't be a cosmic ray strike. I've said that the light leak idea is interesting, it would account for the flash appearing in only one of the cameras.
Click on any news link regarding this find, and all of the scientists claim it ISN'T a cosmic ray, but perhaps light entering the shielding.
There are tons of problems with the provided pictures. First...none of those "lights" look like cosmic rays at all. In fact, none of them are even close to the picture provided in the first posting.